<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20190208//EN"
       "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia</journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia</journal-title>
    <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
     <trans-title>Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета МВД России</trans-title>
    </trans-title-group>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn publication-format="print">2071-8284</issn>
   <issn publication-format="online">2949-1150</issn>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">30923</article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35750/2071-8284-2019-3-55-62</article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru">
     <subject>Конституционное право; конституционный судебный процесс; муниципальное право</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en">
     <subject>Constitutional law; constitutional litigation; municipal law</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group>
     <subject>Конституционное право; конституционный судебный процесс; муниципальное право</subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">Constitutional Reforms in the Digital Era: the Iceland’s Experience</article-title>
    <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
     <trans-title>Конституционные реформы в цифровую эпоху: опыт Исландии</trans-title>
    </trans-title-group>
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group content-type="authors">
    <contrib contrib-type="author">
     <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7294-1649</contrib-id>
     <name-alternatives>
      <name xml:lang="ru">
       <surname>Васильева</surname>
       <given-names>Татьяна Андреевна</given-names>
      </name>
      <name xml:lang="en">
       <surname>Vasilieva</surname>
       <given-names>Tatiana Andreevna</given-names>
      </name>
     </name-alternatives>
     <email>tan-vas@mail.ru</email>
     <bio xml:lang="ru">
      <p>доктор юридических наук;</p>
     </bio>
     <bio xml:lang="en">
      <p>doctor of jurisprudence sciences;</p>
     </bio>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group>
   <aff-alternatives id="aff-1">
    <aff>
     <institution xml:lang="ru">Институт государства и права РАН</institution>
    </aff>
    <aff>
     <institution xml:lang="en">The Institute of State and Law of The Russian Academy of Sciences</institution>
    </aff>
   </aff-alternatives>
   <volume>2019</volume>
   <issue>3</issue>
   <fpage>55</fpage>
   <lpage>62</lpage>
   <self-uri xlink:href="https://russianjournaldeviantbehavior.ru/en/nauka/article/30923/view">https://russianjournaldeviantbehavior.ru/en/nauka/article/30923/view</self-uri>
   <abstract xml:lang="ru">
    <p>Цифровая эпоха создает новые возможности для участия граждан в принятии политических и правовых решений различного уровня. В настоящее время в зарубежных странах распространяется практика привлечения граждан к разработке законов и даже учредительных актов. Проект Конституции Исландии 2011 г. был разработан учредительным собранием, в состав которого входили рядовые граждане, а не представители политической элиты. Благодаря использованию социальных медиа и официального сайта, Конституционный Совет смог установить прямые контакты с населением и оперативно реагировать на предложения и комментарии граждан. Не только граждане страны, но и иностранцы могли представлять свои предложения в отношении того, какие вопросы должны быть отражены в тексте конституции, давать комментарии формулировок тех или иных статей, участвовать в стресс-тесте разработанного проекта. Такой подход легитимировал процесс разработки конституции и порождал чувство сопричастности к данному процессу у тех, кто принимал участие в обсуждении. Несмотря на то, что проект Конституции не был поддержан парламентом страны, опыт Исландии представляет интерес как новый подход к разработке законов в цифровую эпоху. Исландский опыт был признан беспрецедентным и революционным. Он показал, что процесс разработки проекта Конституции может быть более открытым и демократичным без осуществления серьёзных финансовых затрат.</p>
   </abstract>
   <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
    <p>Digital era creates new opportunities for citizens for participation in political and legal decision-making process at various levels. Currently, the practice of involving citizens in drafting of laws and even constituent acts is spreading in foreign countries. The draft of the Constitution of Iceland of 2011 was adopted by the Constitutional Council, which included ordinary citizens, not representatives of the political elite. By the use of social media and the official website, the Council was able to establish direct contacts with the population and promptly respond to suggestions and comments of citizens. Not only citizens, but also foreigners could submit their proposals on issues which should be reflected in the text of the Constitution, comments on the wording of certain articles and participate in the stress test of the constitutional draft. This approach has legitimized the process of the Constitution drafting and created a sense of ownership among those who participated in the discussion. Although this draft has not become the Constitution because of the lack of the Parliament’s support, the Iceland’s experience may be interesting as a new approach to drafting laws in the digital era. The Icelandic experience was considered unprecedented and revolutionary. It showed that the process of Constitution drafting could be more open and democratic without incur-ring significant financial costs.</p>
   </trans-abstract>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
    <kwd>конституция</kwd>
    <kwd>поправки</kwd>
    <kwd>учредительное собрание</kwd>
    <kwd>референдум</kwd>
    <kwd>информационные технологии</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
    <kwd>constitution</kwd>
    <kwd>amendments</kwd>
    <kwd>constituent assembly</kwd>
    <kwd>referendum</kwd>
    <kwd>digital tools</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <p></p>
 </body>
 <back>
  <ref-list>
   <ref id="B1">
    <label>1.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simoncini A. The Constitutional Dimension of the Internet. Some Research Paths // Eu-ropean University Institute Working Paper. - Law. - 2016/16. - 13 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simoncini A. The Constitutional Dimension of the Internet. Some Research Paths // Eu-ropean University Institute Working Paper. - Law. - 2016/16. - 13 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B2">
    <label>2.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Palermo F. La “manutenzione costituzionale”: alla ricerca di una funzione // La “Manutenzione” Costituzionale / A cura di F. Palermo. - Padova: CEDAM, 2007 - 520 p.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Palermo F. La “manutenzione costituzionale”: alla ricerca di una funzione // La “Manutenzione” Costituzionale / A cura di F. Palermo. - Padova: CEDAM, 2007 - 520 p.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B3">
    <label>3.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Landemore H. Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment //The Journal of Political Philosophy. - 2015. - Vol. 23.- No. 2. - P. 166 -191.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Landemore H. Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment //The Journal of Political Philosophy. - 2015. - Vol. 23.- No. 2. - P. 166 -191.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B4">
    <label>4.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eerola A., Reuchamps M. Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases // Revue interdisciplinaire d’etudes jurid-iques. - 2016. - Vol. 77. - No. 2. - P. 319-336.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eerola A., Reuchamps M. Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases // Revue interdisciplinaire d’etudes jurid-iques. - 2016. - Vol. 77. - No. 2. - P. 319-336.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B5">
    <label>5.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gluck J., Ballou B. New Technologies in Constitution Making. Special Report // United States Institute of Peace. - URL: https:// www.usip.org/publications/2014/04/new-technologies-constitutionmaking (дата обращения: 13.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gluck J., Ballou B. New Technologies in Constitution Making. Special Report // United States Institute of Peace. - URL: https:// www.usip.org/publications/2014/04/new-technologies-constitutionmaking (data obrascheniya: 13.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B6">
    <label>6.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Árnason A.Th. A Review of the Icelandic Constitution - Popular Sovereignty or Political Confusion // Tijdschrift voor constitutioneel recht. - 2011. - No. 3. - P. 342-351.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Árnason A.Th. A Review of the Icelandic Constitution - Popular Sovereignty or Political Confusion // Tijdschrift voor constitutioneel recht. - 2011. - No. 3. - P. 342-351.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B7">
    <label>7.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elkins Z., Ginsburg T., Melton J. A Review of Iceland’s Draft Constitution // The Com-parative constitutional Project. October 14, 2012. - URL: http://comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/wp-content/ uploads/CCP-Iceland-Report. pdf?6c8912 (дата обращения: 21.06.2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elkins Z., Ginsburg T., Melton J. A Review of Iceland’s Draft Constitution // The Com-parative constitutional Project. October 14, 2012. - URL: http://comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/wp-content/ uploads/CCP-Iceland-Report. pdf?6c8912 (data obrascheniya: 21.06.2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B8">
    <label>8.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ólafsson J. An Experiment in Iceland: Crowdsourcing a Constitution? // Academia. edu. - URL: https://www.academia.edu/1517443/Experiment_in_Iceland_Crowdsourcing_a_Constitution (дата обращения: 21.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ólafsson J. An Experiment in Iceland: Crowdsourcing a Constitution? // Academia. edu. - URL: https://www.academia.edu/1517443/Experiment_in_Iceland_Crowdsourcing_a_Constitution (data obrascheniya: 21.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B9">
    <label>9.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oddsdóttir K. Iceland: the Birth of the World’s First Crowd-Sourced Constitution?// Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. - 2014. - Vol. 3. - Is. 4. - P. 1207-1220.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oddsdóttir K. Iceland: the Birth of the World’s First Crowd-Sourced Constitution?// Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. - 2014. - Vol. 3. - Is. 4. - P. 1207-1220.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B10">
    <label>10.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bani M. Crowdsourcing Democracy: the Case of Icelandic Social Constitutionalism // ResearchGate. - URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256030306 _Crowdsourcing_ Democracy_The_Case_of_Icelandic_Social_Constitutionalism (дата обращения: 21.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bani M. Crowdsourcing Democracy: the Case of Icelandic Social Constitutionalism // ResearchGate. - URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256030306 _Crowdsourcing_ Democracy_The_Case_of_Icelandic_Social_Constitutionalism (data obrascheniya: 21.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B11">
    <label>11.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gylfason T. Crowds and Constitutions // VOX CERP Policy Portal. 13 October 2011. - URL: https:// voxeu.org/article/crowds-and-constitutions-insights-iceland (дата обращения: 11.03.2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gylfason T. Crowds and Constitutions // VOX CERP Policy Portal. 13 October 2011. - URL: https:// voxeu.org/article/crowds-and-constitutions-insights-iceland (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B12">
    <label>12.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bani M. Crowdsourcing Democracy: the Case of Icelandic Social Constitutionalism // ResearchGate. - URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256030306_Crowdsourcing_Democracy_ The_Case_of_ Icelandic_Social_Constitutionalism (дата обращения: 21.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bani M. Crowdsourcing Democracy: the Case of Icelandic Social Constitutionalism // ResearchGate. - URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256030306_Crowdsourcing_Democracy_ The_Case_of_ Icelandic_Social_Constitutionalism (data obrascheniya: 21.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B13">
    <label>13.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gylfason T., Meuwese A. Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland’s New Constitution // CESifo Working Paper No. 5997. - Category2: Public Choice. - July 2016.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gylfason T., Meuwese A. Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland’s New Constitution // CESifo Working Paper No. 5997. - Category2: Public Choice. - July 2016.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B14">
    <label>14.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hudson A. E. Does Public Participation Really Matter? The Case of Iceland’s Crowdsourced Constitution // URL: https://www.academia.edu/35091728/ Does_Public_Participation_Really_Matter_The_Case_of_Icelands_Crowdsourced_Constitution (дата обращения: 19.01. 2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hudson A. E. Does Public Participation Really Matter? The Case of Iceland’s Crowdsourced Constitution // URL: https://www.academia.edu/35091728/ Does_Public_Participation_Really_Matter_The_Case_of_Icelands_Crowdsourced_Constitution (data obrascheniya: 19.01. 2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B15">
    <label>15.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Suteu S. A New Form of Direct Democracy: Constitutional Conventions in Digital Era. University of Edinburg. Research Paper Series. No. 2014/39 // SSRN. - URL : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2511285 (дата обращения: 12.06. 2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Suteu S. A New Form of Direct Democracy: Constitutional Conventions in Digital Era. University of Edinburg. Research Paper Series. No. 2014/39 // SSRN. - URL : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2511285 (data obrascheniya: 12.06. 2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B16">
    <label>16.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thorarensen B. Why the Making of a Crowd-Sourced Constitution in Iceland Failed // Constitution Making&amp;Constitutional Change. - URL: https://constitutional-change.com/why-the-making-of-a-crowdsourced-constitution-in-iceland-failed (дата обращения: 15.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thorarensen B. Why the Making of a Crowd-Sourced Constitution in Iceland Failed // Constitution Making&amp;Constitutional Change. - URL: https://constitutional-change.com/why-the-making-of-a-crowdsourced-constitution-in-iceland-failed (data obrascheniya: 15.04.2019).</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B17">
    <label>17.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Samu A. Could Romania’s Selfie Go Viral? Economic Feasibility of Using Digital Tools in the Constitutional Law Democratic Process // Procedia Economics and Finance. - 2015. - Vol. 32. - P. 623-624.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Samu A. Could Romania’s Selfie Go Viral? Economic Feasibility of Using Digital Tools in the Constitutional Law Democratic Process // Procedia Economics and Finance. - 2015. - Vol. 32. - P. 623-624.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>
