Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior Российский девиантологический журнал 2713-0622 86615 10.35750/2713-0622-2024-3-350-365 Методология изучения девиантного поведения Methodology for studying deviant behavior Методология изучения девиантного поведения Assessment of counterproductive behavior of law enforcement agencies’ teams of the Republic of Uzbekistan Оценка контрпродуктивного поведения в служебных коллективах органов внутренних дел Республики Узбекистан https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-7309 Иванова Александра Михайловна Ivanova Aleksandra Mihaylovna ivanova_alex@mail.ru

кандидат психологических наук;

candidate of psychological sciences;

 https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2664-5604 Кодиркулов Азизжон Саидкул угли Kodirkulov Azizjon Saidkul kodirkulovaziz@gmail.com Санкт-Петербургский университет МВД России Санкт-Петербург Россия Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia Санкт-Петербург Russian Federation Академия МВД Республики Узбекистан Ташкент Узбекистан Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan Ташкент Uzbekistan 28 10 2024 28 10 2024 4 3 350 365 10 07 2024 20 08 2024 https://russianjournaldeviantbehavior.ru/en/nauka/article/86615/view

Введение. Систематические опоздания, игнорирование предписаний организации и руководства, волокита, подлог документов, моббинг и т. д. наблюдаются в той или иной степени в государственных и коммерческих организациях. Формы поведения, отклоняющегося от принятых в организации норм и этических принципов, исследователями объединены в феномен «контрпродуктивное поведение». Оценка и прогнозирование контрпродуктивных тенденций в служебных коллективах органов внутренних дел (далее – ОВД) служит задачам повышения эффективности профессиональной деятельности, улучшения имиджа правоохранительных органов, предотвращения коррупционных и иных правонарушений, профилактики деструктивного поведения. Методы исследования. На основе процедур психосемантического эксперимента, предложенных В. Ф. Петренко, разработана авторская психосемантическая методика применительно к выявлению риска контрпродуктивного поведения сотрудников ОВД. Также применялись методы экспертной оценки, контент-анализа и тестирования (опросник «Индивидуальное выполнение работы», опросник «Темная триада»). Математико-статистическая обработка результатов исследования проводилась при помощи пакета прикладных программ Microsoft Office Excel 2015 и статической программы SPSSv.22. Достоверность полученных статистических данных оценивалась с помощью показателя значимости различий. Интерпретировались результаты, превышающие значения на уровне достоверности (0,01 < p) и (0,001 < p). Результаты. Проанализированы теоретические и методологические подходы к изучению контрпродуктивного поведения. Обоснована необходимость изучения специфики форм контрпродуктивного поведения в контексте профессиональной деятельности, в т. ч. служебной деятельности сотрудников ОВД. Показано, что выделенный экспертами перечень поступков (всего 32) оригинальной методики всесторонне характеризует специфические для сотрудников МВД Республики Узбекистан формы контрпродуктивного поведения и соответствует условию равномерно представлять встречающиеся в среде сотрудников ОВД формы нарушения социальных и корпоративных норм поведения. Полный перечень контрпродуктивных действий, совершаемых сотрудниками ОВД, в представлении опрошенных сотрудников МВД Республики Узбекистан подразделяется на: 1) оцениваемые нейтрально; 2) оцениваемые негативно, но осуществляемые регулярно; 3) оцениваемые как неприемлемые. Психосемантические основания категоризации контрпродуктивных действий могут служить маркерами уровня развития профессионального сознания отдельных сотрудников ОВД и уровня развития корпоративной культуры в конкретном подразделении.

Introduction. Problems of being systematically late, neglecting the orders of the organization and the authorities,red tape, forgery of documents, mobbing, etc. are common to varying degrees in public and commercial organizations.The researchers examine the phenomenon of ‘counterproductive behaviour’ comprising of the forms of behaviour that deviate from the norms and ethical principles recognised by the organisation. The assessment and forecasting of counterproductive dynamics in law enforcement teams serves the purpose of increasing the efficiency of professional activities, improving the image of law enforcement agencies, preventing corruption and other offences, and preventing destructive behaviour. Research Methods. Analysis of the psychosemantic experiment procedures proposed by V.F. Petrenko was used to develop the authors’ psychosemantic methodology to identify the risk of counterproductive behaviour of law enforcement officers. The methods of expert assessment, content analysis and testing (questionnaire “Individual Performance”, questionnaire “Dark Triad”) were also used. Mathematical and statistical processing of the study results was carried out by means of Microsoft Office Excel 2015 and statistical programme SPSSv.22. The validity of the obtained statistical data was assessed with the indicator of significance of differences. The results above the significance level (0.01 < p) and (0.001 < p) were interpreted. Results. The paper analyses theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of counterproductive behaviour. The authors justify the necessity of studying the distinctive forms of counterproductive behaviour in the context of professional activity, including law enforcement officers’duties. According to the expert sample of the original methodology, the list of actions (32 in total) fully characterises the particular forms of counterproductive behaviour typical for the officers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan and corresponds to the condition to represent equally the forms of violation of social and organisational norms of behaviour among law enforcers. The full list of counterproductive actions committed by law enforcement officers, as presented by the respondents of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, is divided into: 1) assessed neutrally; 2) assessed negatively but carried out regularly; 3) assessed as unacceptable. The psychosemantic basics of categorisation of counterproductive actions can serve as markers of the level of development of professional consciousness of a particular law enforcer and the level of development of organisational culture in a particular unit.

 контрпродуктивное поведение контрпродуктивные действия контрпродуктивные тенденции оценка прогнозирование counterproductive behaviour counterproductive actions counterproductive tends assessment prediction

Егорова, М., Ситникова, М., & Паршикова, О. (2015). Адаптация Короткого опросника Темной триады. Психологические исследования, 8 (43). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i43.1052 Egorova, M., Sitnikova, M., & Parshikova, O. (2015). Adaptaciya Korotkogo oprosnika Temnoj triady. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya, 8 (43). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i43.1052 Иванова, А. М., Кодиркулов, А. С. (2024). Организационная культура и контрпродуктивное поведение сотрудников полиции. Человеческий капитал, 4 (184), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2024.04.15 Ivanova, A. M., Kodirkulov, A. S. (2024). Organizacionnaya kul'tura i kontrproduktivnoe povedenie sotrudnikov policii. Chelovecheskij kapital, 4 (184), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.25629/ HC.2024.04.15 Петренко, В. Ф. (1988). Психосемантика сознания. Москва: Издательство Московского университета. Petrenko, V. F. (1988). Psihosemantika soznaniya. Moskow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. Руднова, Н., & Корниенко, Д. (2022). Психометрические характеристики опросника «Индивидуальное выполнение работы». Психологические исследования, 15 (84), 1. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v15i84.1171 Rudnova, N., & Kornienko, D. (2022). Psihometricheskie harakteristiki oprosnika «Individual'noe vypolnenie raboty». Psihologicheskie issledovaniya, 15 (84), 1. https://doi.org/10.54359/ ps.v15i84.1171 Brender-Ilan, Y, Sheafer, Z. (2019). How do self-efcacy, narcissism and autonomy mediate the link between destructive leadership and counterproductive work behaviour. Asia Pac Manag Rev, 24 (3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.05.003 Brender-Ilan, Y, Sheafer, Z. (2019). How do self-efcacy, narcissism and autonomy mediate the link between destructive leadership and counterproductive work behaviour. Asia Pac Manag Rev, 24 (3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.05.003 Gundhus, H. O., Talberg, O. N., & Wathne, C. T. (2022). False Reporting in the Norwegian Police: Analyzing Counter-productive Elements in Performance Management Systems. Criminal Justice Ethics, 41, 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2022.2146321 Gundhus, H. O., Talberg, O. N., & Wathne, C. T. (2022). False Reporting in the Norwegian Police: Analyzing Counter-productive Elements in Performance Management Systems. Criminal Justice Ethics, 41, 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2022.2146321 Kehr, H. M. (2004). Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities: The compensatory model of work motivation and volition. Academy of Management Review, 29, 479–499. Kehr, H. M. (2004). Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities: The compensatory model of work motivation and volition. Academy of Management Review, 29, 479–499. Lee, S. B., Liu, S. H., & Maertz, C. (2022). The relative impact of employees’ discrete emotions on employees’ negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) and counterproductive workplace behav¬ior (CWB). The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31 (7), 1018–1032. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-07-2021-3555 Lee, S. B., Liu, S. H., & Maertz, C. (2022). The relative impact of employees’ discrete emotions on employees’ negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) and counterproductive workplace behavior (CWB). The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31 (7), 1018–1032. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-07-2021-3555 Li, S., & Chen, Y. (2018). The Relationship Between Psychological Contract Breach and Employees’ Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Cynicism and Work Alienation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01273 Li, S., & Chen, Y. (2018). The Relationship Between Psychological Contract Breach and Employees’ Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Cynicism and Work Alienation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01273 López-Cabarcos, M. Á., López-Carballeira, A., & Ferro-Soto, C. (2023). How to Prevent Hostile Be¬haviors and Emotional Exhaustion among Law Enforcement Professionals: The Negative Spi¬ral of Role Conflict. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (1), 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010863 López-Cabarcos, M. Á., López-Carballeira, A., & Ferro-Soto, C. (2023). How to Prevent Hostile Behaviors and Emotional Exhaustion among Law Enforcement Professionals: The Negative Spiral of Role Conflict. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (1), 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010863 Low, Y. M., Sambasivan, M., & Ho, J. A. (2019). Impact of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behaviors of nurses. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59 (2), 250–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12234 Low, Y. M., Sambasivan, M., & Ho, J. A. (2019). Impact of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behaviors of nurses. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59 (2), 250–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12234 Mehmood, S. A., Malik, A. R., Nadarajah, D., & Saood Akhtar, M. (2023). A moderated mediation model of counterproductive work behaviour, organisational justice, organisational embedded¬ness and psychological ownership. Personnel Review, 52 (1), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/ PR-05-2021-0330 Mehmood, S. A., Malik, A. R., Nadarajah, D., & Saood Akhtar, M. (2023). A moderated mediation model of counterproductive work behaviour, organisational justice, organisational embeddedness and psychological ownership. Personnel Review, 52 (1), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/ PR-05-2021-0330 Miao, Y., Wang, J., Shen, R., & Wang, D. (2023). Effects of Big Five, HEXACO, and Dark Triad on Counterproductive Work Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 25 (3). https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2023.027950 Miao, Y., Wang, J., Shen, R., & Wang, D. (2023). Effects of Big Five, HEXACO, and Dark Triad on Counterproductive Work Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 25 (3). https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2023.027950 Murad, M., Jiatong, W., Shahzad, F., & Syed, N. (2021). The influence of despotic leadership on counterproductive work behavior among police personnel: Role of emotional exhaustion and organizational cynicism. J. Police Crim. Psychol., 36, 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021- 09470-x Murad, M., Jiatong, W., Shahzad, F., & Syed, N. (2021). The influence of despotic leadership on counterproductive work behavior among police personnel: Role of emotional exhaustion and organizational cynicism. J. Police Crim. Psychol., 36, 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09470-x OBoyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679 OBoyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679 O’Brien, K. E., Henson, J. A., & Voss, B. E. (2021). A trait-interactionist approach to understanding the role of stressors in the personality–CWB relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26 (4), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000274 O’Brien, K. E., Henson, J. A., & Voss, B. E. (2021). A trait-interactionist approach to understanding the role of stressors in the personality–CWB relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychol¬ogy, 26 (4), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000274 Palmer, J. C., Komarraju, M., Carter, M. Z., & Karau, S. J. (2017). Angel on one shoulder: Can perceived organizational support moderate the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and counter¬productive work behavior? Personality and Individual Differences, 110 (1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.018 Palmer, J. C., Komarraju, M., Carter, M. Z., & Karau, S. J. (2017). Angel on one shoulder: Can perceived organizational support moderate the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and counter¬productive work behavior? Personality and Individual Differences, 110 (1), 31–37. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.018 Penney, L. M., Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2003). Stress, Personality and Counterproductive Work Behaviour. In: Sagie, A., Stashevsky, S., Koslowsky, M. (eds), Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288829_11 Penney, L. M., Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2003). Stress, Personality and Counterproductive Work Behaviour. In: Sagie, A., Stashevsky, S., Koslowsky, M. (eds), Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288829_11 Rengifo, M., & Laham, S. M. (2022). Big Five personality predictors of moral disengagement: A comprehensive aspect-level approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111176. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111176 Rengifo, M., & Laham, S. M. (2022). Big Five personality predictors of moral disengagement: A comprehensive aspect-level approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111176 Schlosser, L. Z., & Coghlan, T. E. (May 17, 2023). “Officer Self-Sabotage”. Police Chief Online. https:// www.policechiefmagazine.org/officer-self-sabotage/?ref=479bd9c84e367d8642bd0e22ce9b¬f70e (дата обращения: 10.06.2024) Schlosser, L. Z., & Coghlan, T. E. (May 17, 2023). “Officer Self-Sabotage”. Police Chief Online. https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/officer-self-sabotage/?ref=479bd9c84e367d8642bd0e22ce9bf70e Schyns, B. (2015). Dark personality in the workplace: Introduction to the special issue. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12041 Schyns, B. (2015). Dark personality in the workplace: Introduction to the special issue. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12041 Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & LeBreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35 (S1), S41–S60. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1894 Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & LeBreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35 (S1), S41–S60. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1894 Spanouli, A., Hofmans, J., & Dalal, R. S. (2023). Coping with daily boredom: Exploring the relationships of job boredom, counterproductive work behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, and cognitive reappraisal. Motiv Emot, 47, 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023- 10017-2 Spanouli, A., Hofmans, J., & Dalal, R. S. (2023). Coping with daily boredom: Exploring the relationships of job boredom, counterproductive work behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, and cognitive reappraisal. Motiv Emot, 47, 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10017-2 Striler, J., Shoss, M., & Jex, S. (2021). The relationship between stressors of temporary work and counterproductive work behaviour. Stress and Health, 37 (2), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smi.2998 Striler, J., Shoss, M., & Jex, S. (2021). The relationship between stressors of temporary work and counterproductive work behaviour. Stress and Health, 37 (2), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2998 Suroso, A., Gal, T., & Anggraeni, A. I. (2020). Work Stress and Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14 (12). Suroso, A., Gal, T., & Anggraeni, A. I. (2020). Work Stress and Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14 (12). Suseno, Y., Chang, C., Hudik, M., et al. (2021). Why do employees engage in counterproductive work behaviours? Cultural values and white-collar employees in China. Motiv Emot, 45, 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09874-6 Suseno, Y., Chang, C., Hudik, M., et al. (2021). Why do employees engage in counterproductive work behaviours? Cultural values and white-collar employees in China. Motiv Emot, 45, 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09874-6 Suyasa, P. T. Y. (2017). The Role of Quality of Work Life as a Predictor of Counterproductive Work Behavior. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 32 (3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.24123/ aipj.v32i3.631 Suyasa, P. T. Y. (2017). The Role of Quality of Work Life as a Predictor of Counterproductive Work Behavior. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 32 (3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.24123/ aipj.v32i3.631 Zheng, J. (2019). "Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior with Explicit and Implicit Measures of Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Emotional Stability". Electronic Theses and Disserta¬tions, 6329. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6329 Zheng, J. (2019). "Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior with Explicit and Implicit Measures of Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Emotional Stability". Electronic Theses and Disserta¬tions, 6329. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6329