<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20190208//EN"
       "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia</journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title xml:lang="en">Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia</journal-title>
    <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
     <trans-title>Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета МВД России</trans-title>
    </trans-title-group>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn publication-format="print">2071-8284</issn>
   <issn publication-format="online">2949-1150</issn>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">38620</article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35750/2071-8284-2020-3-66-72</article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru">
     <subject>Конституционное право; конституционный судебный процесс; муниципальное право</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en">
     <subject>Constitutional law; constitutional litigation; municipal law</subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group>
     <subject>Конституционное право; конституционный судебный процесс; муниципальное право</subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">The preliminary ruling procedure at the court of justice of the European Union and transformation of European anti-discrimination law</article-title>
    <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
     <trans-title>Преюдициальная процедура в Суде ЕС и трансформация европейского антидискриминационного права</trans-title>
    </trans-title-group>
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group content-type="authors">
    <contrib contrib-type="author">
     <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6618-8574</contrib-id>
     <name-alternatives>
      <name xml:lang="ru">
       <surname>Сорокина</surname>
       <given-names>Елена Александровна</given-names>
      </name>
      <name xml:lang="en">
       <surname>Sorokina</surname>
       <given-names>Elena Aleksandrovna</given-names>
      </name>
     </name-alternatives>
     <email>sorokina_ea@mail.ru</email>
     <bio xml:lang="ru">
      <p>кандидат юридических наук;</p>
     </bio>
     <bio xml:lang="en">
      <p>candidate of jurisprudence sciences;</p>
     </bio>
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group>
   <aff-alternatives id="aff-1">
    <aff>
     <institution xml:lang="ru">Институт государства и права РАН</institution>
     <city>Москва</city>
     <country>Россия</country>
    </aff>
    <aff>
     <institution xml:lang="en">Institute of State and Law Russian Academy of Sciences</institution>
     <city>Moscow</city>
     <country>Russian Federation</country>
    </aff>
   </aff-alternatives>
   <volume>2020</volume>
   <issue>3</issue>
   <fpage>66</fpage>
   <lpage>72</lpage>
   <self-uri xlink:href="https://russianjournaldeviantbehavior.ru/en/nauka/article/38620/view">https://russianjournaldeviantbehavior.ru/en/nauka/article/38620/view</self-uri>
   <abstract xml:lang="ru">
    <p>Существенной особенностью правовой системы ЕС является преюдициальная процедура, представляющая собой уникальный инструмент сотрудничества в рамках диалога между Судом ЕС и национальными судебными органами государств-членов. Основная её цель – это обеспечение единообразного толкования и применения положений права ЕС во всех национальных правопорядках и сохранение единства европейской правовой системы. Постоянное использование национальными судами государств-членов механизма преюдициальных запросов и конструктивное межсудебное сотрудничество позволило Суду ЕС выработать обширную судебную практику о запрете дискриминации и внести существенные изменения в европейское антидискриминационное право. Преюдициальные решения Суда ЕС демонстрируют склонность к расширению представлений о том, что представляет собой дискриминация. В большинстве случаев они свидетельствуют о постоянном стремлении Суда толковать положения  вропейского права таким образом, чтобы обеспечить их полную эффективность. Очевидна его готовность в продвижении и улучшении защиты от дискриминации в Европе. Хотя эта защита не одинакова для всех дискриминационных оснований, однако определённые правовые позиции Суда ЕС  являются важным вкладом в трансформацию антидискримиционного права, способствуют изменениям в национальном законодательстве государств-членов и более эффективной защите основных прав и свобод человека в целом.</p>
   </abstract>
   <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
    <p>The preliminary ruling procedure is an essential feature of the EU legal system, which is a unique cooperation tool as part of the dialogue between the Court of Justice of the EU and national courts of the Member States. Its main purpose is to ensure uniform interpretation and application of the provisions of EU law with all Member States and to preserve the uniformity of the European legal system. The continuous use by national courts of the Member States of the mechanism of preliminary ruling and constructive inter-judicial cooperation, the Court of Justice has developed an extremely extensive case law on the prohibition of discrimination and with the result to introduce substantial changes in European anti-discrimination law.The preliminary rulings of the Court of Justice have shown its inclination to expand notions of what constitutes discrimination and in most cases the Court prompt by the desire to interpret the provisions of European law so as to ensure the full effectiveness of the law, as well as a willingness to promote and strengthen protection against discrimination in Europe. While the protection against discrimination on some grounds is stronger than others, however, the preliminary rulings of the Court of Justice are important contribution to the transformation of anti-discrimination law, promote change in the national legislation of the Member States and provide the more effective protection of human rights in general.</p>
   </trans-abstract>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
    <kwd>право ЕС</kwd>
    <kwd>Суд ЕС</kwd>
    <kwd>национальные суды</kwd>
    <kwd>преюдициальная процедура</kwd>
    <kwd>судебный диалог</kwd>
    <kwd>антидискримиционное право</kwd>
    <kwd>защита от дискриминации</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
   <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
    <kwd>EU law</kwd>
    <kwd>CJEU</kwd>
    <kwd>national courts</kwd>
    <kwd>preliminary ruling procedure</kwd>
    <kwd>judicial dialogue</kwd>
    <kwd>antidiscrimination law</kwd>
    <kwd>protection against discrimination</kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <p></p>
 </body>
 <back>
  <ref-list>
   <ref id="B1">
    <label>1.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fabbrini F. Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. - 360 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702047.001.0001.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fabbrini F. Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. - 360 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702047.001.0001.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B2">
    <label>2.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tizzano A. The Role of the ECJ in the Protection of Fundamental Rights // Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs / ed. by A. Arnull, P. Eeckhout, T. Tridimas. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. - P. 125-138. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219032.003.0007</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tizzano A. The Role of the ECJ in the Protection of Fundamental Rights // Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs / ed. by A. Arnull, P. Eeckhout, T. Tridimas. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. - P. 125-138. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219032.003.0007</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B3">
    <label>3.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сорокина Е. А. Преюдициальные запросы в Суд Европейского союза: содержательные критерии приемлемости // Труды Института государства и права РАН / Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS. - 2019. -Т. 14. - № 4. - С. 131-156. DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2019-14-4-sorokina</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sorokina E. A. Preyudicial'nye zaprosy v Sud Evropeyskogo soyuza: soderzhatel'nye kriterii priemlemosti // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN / Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS. - 2019. -T. 14. - № 4. - S. 131-156. DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2019-14-4-sorokina</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B4">
    <label>4.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eriksson А. European Court of Justice: Broadening the scope of European nondiscrimination law // International Journal of Constitutional Law. - 2009. - Vol. 7. - Iss. 4. - P. 731-753. DOI: 10.1093/icon/ mop025</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eriksson A. European Court of Justice: Broadening the scope of European nondiscrimination law // International Journal of Constitutional Law. - 2009. - Vol. 7. - Iss. 4. - P. 731-753. DOI: 10.1093/icon/ mop025</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B5">
    <label>5.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murray J. L. Fundamental Rights in the European Community Legal Order // Fordham International Law Journal. - 2008. - Vol. 32. - Iss. 2. - P. 624-659.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murray J. L. Fundamental Rights in the European Community Legal Order // Fordham International Law Journal. - 2008. - Vol. 32. - Iss. 2. - P. 624-659.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B6">
    <label>6.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ellis E., Watson P. EU Anti-Discrimination Law. - Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. - 576 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698462.001.0001</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ellis E., Watson P. EU Anti-Discrimination Law. - Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. - 576 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698462.001.0001</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B7">
    <label>7.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wintemute R. Recognising New Kinds of Direct Sex Discrimination: Transsexualism, Sexual Orientation and Dress Codes // Modern Law Review. - 1997. - Vol. 60. - Iss. 3. - P. 334-359.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wintemute R. Recognising New Kinds of Direct Sex Discrimination: Transsexualism, Sexual Orientation and Dress Codes // Modern Law Review. - 1997. - Vol. 60. - Iss. 3. - P. 334-359.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B8">
    <label>8.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burgorgue-Larsen L. Il principio di non discriminazione nel diritto dell’Unione l’articolo 19 del Trattato sul funzionamento dell’Unione europea, ovvero la rivoluzione silenziosa // Ragion practica. - 2011. - No. 36. - P. 55-74. DOI: 10.1415/34413</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burgorgue-Larsen L. Il principio di non discriminazione nel diritto dell’Unione l’articolo 19 del Trattato sul funzionamento dell’Unione europea, ovvero la rivoluzione silenziosa // Ragion practica. - 2011. - No. 36. - P. 55-74. DOI: 10.1415/34413</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B9">
    <label>9.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Iliopoulou A. Le principe de non-discrimination devant les juges communautaire et national // regards sur le droit de l’union européenne après l’échec du traité constitutionnel / dir. J. Rossetto, A. Berramdane. - Tours: Presses universitaires François-Rabelais, 2007. - P. 243-261.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iliopoulou A. Le principe de non-discrimination devant les juges communautaire et national // regards sur le droit de l’union européenne après l’échec du traité constitutionnel / dir. J. Rossetto, A. Berramdane. - Tours: Presses universitaires François-Rabelais, 2007. - P. 243-261.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B10">
    <label>10.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dougan M. In Defence of Mangold? // A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood / ed. by A. Arnull, C. Barnard, M. Dougan, E. Spaventa. - Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011. - P. 219-244. DOI: 10.5040/9781472565402.ch-012</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dougan M. In Defence of Mangold? // A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood / ed. by A. Arnull, C. Barnard, M. Dougan, E. Spaventa. - Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011. - P. 219-244. DOI: 10.5040/9781472565402.ch-012</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B11">
    <label>11.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jans J. The Effect in National Legal Systems of the Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Age as a General Principle of Community Law // Legal Issues of Economic Integration. - 2007. - Vol. 1. - P. 53-65.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jans J. The Effect in National Legal Systems of the Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Age as a General Principle of Community Law // Legal Issues of Economic Integration. - 2007. - Vol. 1. - P. 53-65.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B12">
    <label>12.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Masson A., Micheau C. The Werner Mangold Case: An Example of Legal Militancy // European Public Law. - 2007. - Vol. 13. - Iss. 4. - P. 587-593.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Masson A., Micheau C. The Werner Mangold Case: An Example of Legal Militancy // European Public Law. - 2007. - Vol. 13. - Iss. 4. - P. 587-593.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B13">
    <label>13.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tobler C. Putting Mangold in Perspective: In Response to Editorial Comments, Horizontal Direct Effect - A Law of Diminishing Coherence? // Common Market Law Review. - 2007. - Vol. 44. - P. 1177-1183.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tobler C. Putting Mangold in Perspective: In Response to Editorial Comments, Horizontal Direct Effect - A Law of Diminishing Coherence? // Common Market Law Review. - 2007. - Vol. 44. - P. 1177-1183.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
   <ref id="B14">
    <label>14.</label>
    <citation-alternatives>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zaccaroni G. Differentiating Equality? The Different Advancements in the Protected Grounds in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice // The Principle of Equality in EU Law / ed. by L.S. Rossi, F. Casolari. - Cham: Springer, 2017. - P. 167-195. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66137-7_6.</mixed-citation>
     <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaccaroni G. Differentiating Equality? The Different Advancements in the Protected Grounds in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice // The Principle of Equality in EU Law / ed. by L.S. Rossi, F. Casolari. - Cham: Springer, 2017. - P. 167-195. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66137-7_6.</mixed-citation>
    </citation-alternatives>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>
