employee from 01.01.2008 until now
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.87 Международное право
OKSO 40.06.01 Юриспруденция
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 75 Право. Юридические науки
BISAC ART000000 General
The preliminary ruling procedure is an essential feature of the EU legal system, which is a unique cooperation tool as part of the dialogue between the Court of Justice of the EU and national courts of the Member States. Its main purpose is to ensure uniform interpretation and application of the provisions of EU law with all Member States and to preserve the uniformity of the European legal system. The continuous use by national courts of the Member States of the mechanism of preliminary ruling and constructive inter-judicial cooperation, the Court of Justice has developed an extremely extensive case law on the prohibition of discrimination and with the result to introduce substantial changes in European anti-discrimination law.The preliminary rulings of the Court of Justice have shown its inclination to expand notions of what constitutes discrimination and in most cases the Court prompt by the desire to interpret the provisions of European law so as to ensure the full effectiveness of the law, as well as a willingness to promote and strengthen protection against discrimination in Europe. While the protection against discrimination on some grounds is stronger than others, however, the preliminary rulings of the Court of Justice are important contribution to the transformation of anti-discrimination law, promote change in the national legislation of the Member States and provide the more effective protection of human rights in general.
EU law, CJEU, national courts, preliminary ruling procedure, judicial dialogue, antidiscrimination law, protection against discrimination
1. Fabbrini F. Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. - 360 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702047.001.0001.
2. Tizzano A. The Role of the ECJ in the Protection of Fundamental Rights // Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs / ed. by A. Arnull, P. Eeckhout, T. Tridimas. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. - P. 125-138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219032.003.0007
3. Sorokina E. A. Preyudicial'nye zaprosy v Sud Evropeyskogo soyuza: soderzhatel'nye kriterii priemlemosti // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN / Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS. - 2019. -T. 14. - № 4. - S. 131-156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35427/2073-4522-2019-14-4-sorokina
4. Eriksson A. European Court of Justice: Broadening the scope of European nondiscrimination law // International Journal of Constitutional Law. - 2009. - Vol. 7. - Iss. 4. - P. 731-753. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/ mop025
5. Murray J. L. Fundamental Rights in the European Community Legal Order // Fordham International Law Journal. - 2008. - Vol. 32. - Iss. 2. - P. 624-659.
6. Ellis E., Watson P. EU Anti-Discrimination Law. - Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. - 576 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698462.001.0001
7. Wintemute R. Recognising New Kinds of Direct Sex Discrimination: Transsexualism, Sexual Orientation and Dress Codes // Modern Law Review. - 1997. - Vol. 60. - Iss. 3. - P. 334-359.
8. Burgorgue-Larsen L. Il principio di non discriminazione nel diritto dell’Unione l’articolo 19 del Trattato sul funzionamento dell’Unione europea, ovvero la rivoluzione silenziosa // Ragion practica. - 2011. - No. 36. - P. 55-74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1415/34413
9. Iliopoulou A. Le principe de non-discrimination devant les juges communautaire et national // regards sur le droit de l’union européenne après l’échec du traité constitutionnel / dir. J. Rossetto, A. Berramdane. - Tours: Presses universitaires François-Rabelais, 2007. - P. 243-261.
10. Dougan M. In Defence of Mangold? // A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood / ed. by A. Arnull, C. Barnard, M. Dougan, E. Spaventa. - Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011. - P. 219-244. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472565402.ch-012
11. Jans J. The Effect in National Legal Systems of the Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Age as a General Principle of Community Law // Legal Issues of Economic Integration. - 2007. - Vol. 1. - P. 53-65.
12. Masson A., Micheau C. The Werner Mangold Case: An Example of Legal Militancy // European Public Law. - 2007. - Vol. 13. - Iss. 4. - P. 587-593.
13. Tobler C. Putting Mangold in Perspective: In Response to Editorial Comments, Horizontal Direct Effect - A Law of Diminishing Coherence? // Common Market Law Review. - 2007. - Vol. 44. - P. 1177-1183.
14. Zaccaroni G. Differentiating Equality? The Different Advancements in the Protected Grounds in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice // The Principle of Equality in EU Law / ed. by L.S. Rossi, F. Casolari. - Cham: Springer, 2017. - P. 167-195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66137-7_6.
