Sestroreck, Russian Federation
from 01.01.2018 until now
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.27 Гражданское право
OKSO 40.05.01 Правовое обеспечение национальной безопасности
BBK 674 Отрасли права
TBK 754 Гражданское право
BISAC LAW011000 Civil Law
Introduction. In the presented work, the authors investigated the main aspects of the reform of the procedural legislation initiated by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation regarding the introduction of a new participant in the trial - the attorney. Purpose. The aim of the work is to identify the features of the legal status of such a participant in civil proceedings as an attorney within the framework of the institution of representation. Methodology. The work was performed on the basis of special methods of cognition, including historical and legal, logical, formally legal. Results. Based on the analysis of the results of the consideration of the draft Federal Law No. 383208-7 «On Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation», the appropriateness of the initiative to introduce a new member into civil proceedings is assessed - attorney. The relationship of this short story with the proposed increase in the requirements for the representative’s professionalism was analyzed, and its main advantages and disadvantages were highlighted. It is concluded that the benefit of introducing such a participant in the civil process as an attorney is more theoretical than practical, since this is due to the fact that the actions that the considered procedural figure (attorney) is authorized to perform can be performed by an ordinary representative without extra costs. At its core, an attorney is a kind of assistant to the representative, not able to independently participate in the trial and is dependent on both the principal and the representative. Conclusion. The material contained in the work is of interest for further scientific research on the problematic issues of the institution of representation in civil proceedings. Some conclusions can be used during lectures and seminars on the subject of civil procedure law.
institution of attorneys, civil procedure law, professional representative, court session
1. Tkacheva N.N. Neobhodimost' uchastiya predstavitelya s yuridicheskim obrazovaniem v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Vektor nauki TGU. Ser.: Yuridicheskie nauki. - № 3. - 2017. - S. 52-55.
2. Berdieva A. A. Reformirovanie instituta predstavitel'stva v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Molodoj uchenyj. - № 22. - 2018. - S. 210-211.
3. Solomatin E.I. Institut advokatury kak sub"ekt pravozashchitnoj deyatel'nosti v dorevolyucionnoj Rossii // Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. - №1-2. - 2015. - S. 84-94.
4. Saryglar Sh.O., Bahareva O.A. Nekotorye sudebnye voprosy regulirovaniya instituta sudebnogo predstavitel'stva, v svete predlagaemyh izmenenij Verhovnogo suda RF № 30 ot 03.10.2017 // Studencheskij forum: elektron. nauchn. zhurn. 2018. № 1(22). URL: https://nauchforum.ru/journal/stud/22/30240 (data obrashcheniya: 27.12.2019).
5. Skovorodova K.V. Formirovanie pravovogo statusa processual'nogo poverennogo v kontekste reformirovaniya instituta sudebnogo predstavitel'stva v grazhdanskom processe Rossii / Materialy 56-j Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. - Novosibirskij nacional'nyj issledovatel'skij universitet 22-27 aprelya 2018 g. S.330-331.
6. Peters A.V. Spornye voprosy reformy grazhdanskogo processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik OmYuA. - № 4. - 2018. - S. 492-496.
7. Lavickaya M.I., Bureev A.A., Efremova O.V. K voprosu o celesoobraznosti popytok vozrozhdeniya instituta poverennyh v grazhdanskom processe sovremennoj Rossii / Prava i svobody cheloveka i grazhdanina: aktual'nye problemy nauki i praktiki / Sbornik nauchnyh statej i dokladov. H Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. / pod obshch. red. Merkulova P.A., Shchegolevoj N.A. - Izdatel'stvo: Srednerusskij institut upravleniya - filial RANHiGS (Orel), 2018. S. 32-41.
8. Pronina M.P. Spornye voprosy reformirovaniya instituta predstavitel'stva v grazhdanskom processe // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. - № 1 (50). - 2019. - S. 122-127.
9. Matveeva I.A. Professional'noe predstavitel'stvo v sudah po grazhdanskim i arbitrazhnym delam: dostoinstva i nedostatki // Reformirovanie ucheta i prava v sovremennoj Rossii: sbornik nauchnyh trudov studentov bakalavriata, magistratury i aspirantury / pod redakciej V.A. Baranova, A.N. Prizhennikovoj. - M.: KnoRus, 2018. S. 185-189.
10. Bekov Ya. Institut poverennogo v processual'nom prave // Advokatskaya gazeta. 2018. URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/institut-poverennogo-v-protsessualnom-prave/ (data obrashcheniya: 09.05.2019).
