Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Terrorist activity in all its manifestations is the main source of threat to the public security of the Russian Federation and the entire world community. Its organized nature poses increasingly complex challenges to society. Today, terrorism is becoming complex and highly organized in character. Organized terrorist activity has a high level of danger, provokes the phenomenon of social fear, in which a person feels his helpless in the face of the absolute of all-encompassing violence. The concepts «terrorist activity», «organized activity», and «organized criminal activity» are analysed in the paper. On the basis of these notions examination, the author offers his own definition of «organized terrorist activity». The article contains the analysis of the doctrinal understanding of «organized criminal activity» definition. The article describes the content aspects of the term «terrorist activity» where the features of this definition from the point of view of social sciences and of criminal law norms are taken into account. The author analyses the fixed definition of «terrorist activity» given in the Federal law «On countering terrorism» and the criminal law concept of «terrorist activity». Different approaches to understanding organized criminal activity from the points of view of criminal law and criminology are investigated. The correlation between the concepts «organizational criminal activity» and «organized criminal activity» is shown.

Keywords:
terrorist activity, terrorism, organized activity, organized criminal activity, organized terrorist activity, organization of an illegal armed group, terrorist community, terrorist organization
References

1. Egorova N. A. Protivodeystvie terrorizmu: novelly ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vse- rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. - 2014. - № 3. - S. 127-134.

2. Kolotusha V. V. Terroristicheskaya deyatel'nost' v globaliziruyuschemsya mire // Vestnik Mo- skovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2014. - № 9. - S. 63-66.

3. Kornilov A. V. Razgranichenie publichnyh prizyvov k ekstremistskoy i terroristicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. - 2013. - № 4 (10). - S. 92-99.

4. Mayakova A. S. K probleme protivodeystviya special'nym prestupnym ob'edineniyam // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. Yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2018. - № 5. - S. 131-136.

5. Tel'nov P. F. Otvetstvennost' za souchastie v prestuplenii. - Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1974. - 208 c.

6. Pinkevich T. V., Chernyh E. E. Publichnye prizyvy k osuschestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel'nosti ili publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma: problemy kvalifikacii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2014. - № 3 (27). - S. 141-144.

7. Pobegaylo E. F. Izbrannye trudy. - Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy centr Press», 2008. - 1066 s.

8. Rarog A. I. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossii protiv terrorizma // Lex Russica. - 2017. - № 4 (125). - S.155-178.

9. Burchak F. G. Souchastie: social'nye, kriminologicheskie i pravovye problemy. - Kiev: Vischa shkola, 1986. - 208 c.

10. Tarbagaev A. N., Moskalev G. L. Publichnye prizyvy k osuschestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel'nosti (st. 205.2 UK RF): problemy ugolovno-pravovoy reglamentacii i kvalifikacii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Pravo. - 2016. - Vyp. 2. - S. 28-39.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?