Russian Federation
Relevance. Since the XVIII century, there has been a gradual qualitative transformation of sovereign power in the course of the formation of a biopower based on the regulation of natural processes inherent in the population. At the turn of the XX–XXI centuries, biopolitics as an authoritative organization of the life of the population became the dominant management model. At present, numerous biopolitical tools carry out the construction of the social. Objectives. The purpose of the article is to explicate the process of transformation of the legal and institutional model of regulation of public relations inherent in sovereign power into biolaw as a tool for regulating public relations carried out by biopower. Results. In the course of the study, the process of the formation of biolaw, which arises on the basis of the already established system of legal and political regulation due to its modification by biopolitical means of medicalization, normalization, identification, criminal biopolitics, is considered. As a result of the steady biopolitical intervention in the regulation of the life of the population, the lex-law as a system of legal norms expands to nomos-law focused on a sample of the natural order, correlative to the constructed norms of human life as a biosocial being. Conclusions. Biopolitics in the process of formation radically transforms the social, including legal relations. Biolaw is a system of flexible tools for regulating social relations, tending to the model of the natural order. Biopolitical regulation is steadily replacing the traditional legal and political management model.
human, biopolitics, criminal biopolitics, norm, normalization, medicalization
1. Esposito, R. (2008). Bíos: Biopolitics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2. Ojakangas, M. (2016). On the Greek Origins of Biopolitics: A Reinterpretation of the History of Biopower. New York: Routledge.
3. Agamben, Dzh. (2015). Sredstva bez celi. Zametki o politike. Moscow: Gileya.
4. Agamben, Dzh. (2019). Carstvo i Slava. K teologicheskoj genealogii ekonomiki i upravleniya. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara; Fakul’tet svobodnyh iskusstv i nauk SPbGU.
5. Arendt, H. (2000). Vita activa, ili O deyatel’noj zhizni. Saint Petersburg: Aletejya.
6. Bavsun, M. V., Popov, D. V. (2019). Biopoliticheskiy «bekgraund» ugolovnoy politiki. Filosofiya prava, 4 (91), 75-84.
7. Davydov, D. A. (2020). Revolyuciya lichnosti, ili voskhozhdenie personaliata. Politiya, 4 (99), 68-89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30570/2078- 5089-2020-99-4-68-89
8. Duglas, M. (2000). CHistota i opasnost’. Moscow: KANON-press-C: Kuchkovo pole.
9. Zinov’ev, A. A. (2003). Global’nyj chelovejnik. Moscow: Eksmo.
10. Il’in, I. A. (1994). Sobranie sochinenij: V 10 t. T. 4. Moscow: Russkaya kniga.
11. Kil’dyushov, O. V. (2014). Mishel’ Fuko kak issledovatel’ «policejskogo gosudarstva»: programma, evristicheskie problemy, perspektivy izucheniya. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 13 (3), 9-32.
12. Moskovichi, S. (1998). Vek tolp. Istoricheskij traktat po psihologii mass. Moscow: Centr psihologii i psihoterapii.
13. Pajps, R. (2000). Sobstvennost’ i svoboda. Moscow: Moskovskaya Shkola Politicheskih Issledovanij.
14. Svaab, D. (2014). My - eto nash mozg: Ot matki do Al’cgejmera. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Ivana Limbaha.
15. de Serto, M. (2013). Izobretenie povsednevnosti. 1. Iskusstvo delat’. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge.
16. Torval’d, Yu. (1984). Vek kriminalistiki. Moscow: Progress.
17. Fuko, M. (2002). Intellektualy i vlast’: Izbrannye politicheskie stat’i, vystupleniya i interv’yu. Moscow: Praksis.
18. Fuko, M. (2005). Nenormal’nye: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1974-1975 uchebnom godu. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.
19. Fuko, M. (2005). Nuzhno zashchishchat’ obshchestvo: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1975-1976 uchebnom godu. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.
20. Fuko, M. (2010). Rozhdeniye biopolitiki. Kurs lektsiy, prochitannyy v Kollezh de Frans v 1978-1979 uchebnom godu. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.
21. Fuko, M. (2011). Bezopasnost’, territoriya, naselenie. Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1977-1978 uchebnom godu. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.
22. Yarkeev, A. V. (2018). Ontologicheskie osnovaniya zla v sovremennom obshchestve: filosofsko-germenevticheskij aspekt. Ekaterinburg-Izhevsk: IFiPUrO RAN.
23. Yarkeev, A. V. (2021). Teologicheskie osnovaniya sovremennoj vlasti: opyt dekonstrukcii. Antinomii, 21 (1), 7-26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-7206-2021-1-7-26
