To the question of the specific use of the means of specialized constitutional control of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the mechanism of resolution of public law conflicts
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The following work addresses the issues of the specifics of using the means of specialized constitutional control of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the mechanism of resolving public law conflicts. The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between the norms of the constitutional law of Russia in the field of judicial constitutional review carried out by a specialized judicial body - the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, and the management of conflicts arising from public law relations, by considering both the theory and practice of federal constitutional jurisprudence. Based on examples of normative control activities of a specialized jurisdictional control body, the author of this article makes analytical conclusions regarding the possibility and effectiveness of eliminating the identified uncertainty in the legal regulation of various spheres of society, including the “conflict” and “gaps” of domestic legislation, by “legal”, «peaceful» means. Particular attention is paid to the issue of analyzing the theoretical complexity of the considered legal conflicts arising from public law relations, due to their «mixed» nature, which includes both legal and extra-legal elements based on political confrontations or arising from national conflicts, and therefore not related exclusively to law.

Keywords:
public law conflict, judicial constitutional control, legal conflictology, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, legal collision
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Aranovskiy K. V., Knyazev S. D. Pravlenie prava i pravovoe gosudarstvo v sootnoshenii znakov i znacheniy : monografiya. - Moskva: Prospekt, 2016. - 256 s.

2. Baranova M. V. Pravovaya kommunikaciya gosudarstva i obschestva v usloviyah permanentnoy yuridizacii otnosheniy: specifika, problemy, trendy / Pravovaya kommunikaciya gosudarstva i obschestva: otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt : cbornik trudov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii, Voronezh, 11-12 sentyabrya 2020 g. - Voronezh: Nauka-Yunipress, 2020. - S. 81-88.

3. Gruzdev V. S. Perspektivy realizma v sovremennoy filosofii prava i teorii prava // Mirovye tendencii razvitiya nauki, obrazovaniya, tehnologiy : sbornik nauchnyh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii / pod obsch. red. E. P. Tkachevoy. - Belgorod: OOO Agentstvo perspektivnyh nauchnyh issledovaniy (APNI), 2021. - S. 54-57.

4. Denisenko V. V. Kollizii pravovyh aktov i sposoby ih razresheniya (teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt) : monografiya. - Voronezh: Voronezhskiy gos. un-t, 2005. - 131 s.

5. Karnaushenko L. V. Sootnoshenie teorii estestvennogo prava i teorii pozitivnogo prava // Filosofiya prava. - 2021. - № 1 (96). - S. 7-11.

6. Stepanova A. A., Hafizov E. D. Metodologiya pozitivizma v analize suschnosti ponyatiy «pravo» i «vlast'» // Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstva i obschestva v oblasti obespecheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina. - 2021. - № 1. - S. 180-188.

7. Fienberg J., Coleman J. (Eds.) / J. Fienberg, J. Coleman // Philosophy of Law (9th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth. Publishing P., 2013. 1056 p.

8. Lang M. Introduction to Law and its Relationship to Conflict Analysis. Distributed Learning Course Material / M. Lang // Victoria: Royal Roads University, 2001. - 117 p.

9. MacFarlane J. (Ed.). Dispute Resolution: Reading and Case Studies / J. MacFarlane (Ed.) // Toronto: Edmond Montgomery Publication Limited, 1999. - P. 15.

10. Kurmaeva T. I., Hudoykina T. V. Yuridicheskiy konflikt: ponyatie i priroda // Nauchnyy aspekt. - 2015. - № 2-2. - S. 125-128.

11. Tatarinov S. A. Polnomochiya Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii po preodoleniyu konstitucionno-pravovyh probelov // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. - 2020. - № 3. - S. 48-52.

12. Alekseeva T. M. Svoystva res judicata v kontekste resheniy Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka: sootnoshenie i predely deystviya // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. - 2021. - T. 7. - № 1. - S. 29-39.

13. Ambalova S. M. O sootnoshenii preyudicii i obyazatel'nosti sudebnyh aktov: nekotorye teoretiko-prakticheskie aspekty / Problemy effektivnosti prava v sovremennoy Rossii : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii: v 2 t., Krasnodar, 7 oktyabrya 2016 goda. - Krasnodar: Kubanskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2016. - S. 347-355.

14. Hudoykina T. V. Yuridicheskaya konfliktologiya: ot ishodnyh poziciy teorii do praktiki razresheniya i preduprezhdeniya yuridicheskogo konflikta. - Saransk: Izdatel'stvo Mordovskogo universiteta, 2001. - 392 s.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?