from 01.01.2019 until now
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 343.13 Уголовно-процессуальное право
GRNTI 10.00 ГОСУДАРСТВО И ПРАВО. ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ
OKSO 40.00.00 Юриспруденция
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 7 ОБЩЕСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ. ЭКОНОМИКА. ПРАВО.
BISAC LAW027000 Criminal Procedure
The article analyzes the criminal procedural problems associated with the legal regulation of the grounds for refusing to initiate a criminal case and the grounds for terminating a criminal case. The authors note that at present the legislator’s approach to their systematization, as well as the content of individual grounds, are the cause of a number of problems that arise in law enforcement. In this regard, the need to improve these criminal procedure institutions is stated. The purpose of the study is to identify the problems of legal regulation of the grounds for refusing to initiate a criminal case and the grounds for terminating a criminal case and suggesting possible ways to solve them. To achieve this goal, methods of analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical, formal-legal, comparative-legal research methods were used. In the work, based on legal and technical considerations, it is proposed to separate the grounds for refusing to initiate a criminal case and the grounds for its termination, fixing them in separate articles of the criminal procedure law. Arguments are also given in favor of distinguishing between such grounds as the absence of an event of a crime and the absence of corpus delicti in an act. Based on the analysis, the author proposes a list of grounds for both refusal to initiate a case and grounds for its termination. Conclusions are drawn that the proposals made will contribute to the improvement of the legal technique for presenting these grounds in the criminal procedure law and, as a result, to increase the efficiency of law enforcement activities aimed at implementing the non-punitive aspect of the appointment of criminal proceedings.
criminal procedure, criminal justice process, initiation of criminal procedure, termination of criminal procedure, event of crime, elements of crime
1. Himicheva G. P. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam: koncepciya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-processual'noy deyatel'nosti: monografiya. - Moskva: Ekzamen, 2003. - 352 s.
2. Fil'chenko A. P. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ugolovno-pravovoy kategorii «deyanie» i ugolovno-processual'noy konstrukcii «sobytie prestupleniya» // Advokat. - 2014. - № 2. - S. 19-23.
3. Artamonov A. N. Prekraschenie ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) v svyazi s otsutstviem sobytiya prestupleniya, otsutstviem v deyanii sostava prestupleniya, neprichastnost'yu podozrevaemogo ili obvinyaemogo k soversheniyu prestupleniya // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. - 2015. - № 1 (34). - S. 71-78.
4. Provotar' Yu. A. Problemy razgranicheniya osnovaniy dlya prinyatiya processual'nyh resheniy ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s otsutstviem sobytiya i otsutstviem sostava prestupleniya / Krymskie yuridicheskie chteniya. Pravonarushenie i otvetstvennost' : sbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Simferopol', 8 iyunya 2017 goda. - Simferopol': OOO «Izdatel'stvo Tipografiya «Arial», 2017. - S. 211-214.
5. Mineev Yu. V. Osobennosti prinyatiya resheniya ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s otsutstviem sobytiya prestupleniya // Nauchnyy daydzhest Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2021. - № 3 (13). - S. 81-85.
6. Barkalova E. V., Stryukova E. N. K voprosu ob opredelenii osnovaniy otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela ili prekrascheniya ugolovnogo dela // Voennoe pravo. - 2019. - № 4 (56). - S. 247-254.
7. Mel'nikov A. V. O sravnenii otechestvennyh i zarubezhnyh pravil otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela // Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ih resheniya. - 2019. - № 3 (25). - S. 141-143.
8. Volynskaya O. V., Grashicheva O. N. Problema razgranicheniya osnovaniya otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela i ego prekrascheniya v sootvetstvii s p. 4 ch. 1 st. 24 UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2017. - № 17. - S. 11-14.
9. Aristarhov A. L. O special'nyh osnovaniyah prekrascheniya ugolovnogo dela v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. - 2019. - № 3. - S. 79-84.
10. Dikaev S. U., Dikaeva M. S., Rytchenko A. V., Ponomareva M. A. Prekraschenie ugolovnogo dela po reabilitiruyuschim osnovaniyam v stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya : monografiya. - Sankt-Peterburg: Truvor, 2019. - 103 s.
