from 01.01.2021 to 01.01.2022
SAnkt-Peterburg, Russian Federation
UDK 347.5 Внедоговорное обязательственное право
Determination of the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary damage caused by illegal actions during the inquiry, investigation, prosecution, and court proceedings is still a challenging task. Effective protection of civil rights by restoring justice for the suffering caused by unlawful prosecution allows you to secure the trust of citizens in the state. The object of the study is the criteria on the basis of which the court decides on the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary damage suffered as a result of illegal criminal prosecution. The research methodology composes of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, generalization, comparison) and particular scientific (formal-legal and structuralfunctional) methods. The author used a systematic approach and a method of legal interpretation. The purpose of the study is to characterize the criteria used by the government agencies in determining the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary damage caused by illegal actions. The author explores the use of the evaluative concepts of «reasonableness», «fairness», «proportionality», «reality» in law enforcement practice. The empirical base of the study consists of the decisions of the Russian district and appeal courts, as well as the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the European Court of Human Rights made in 2010-2021. An analysis of law enforcement practice on the considered topic allows to evaluate the influence of the human factor that reveals itself in the creative approach to determining the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary damage caused by the illegal actions during the inquiry, investigation, prosecution, and court proceedings. The lack of the clear rules considering the compensation amount entails uncertainty in the emerging judicial practice which in its turn becomes increasingly regionally specific.
delicts, non-pecuniary damage compensation, evaluative concepts, reasonableness, justice, proportionality, reality
1. Vil'nyanskiy S. I. Primenenie norm sovetskogo prava // Uchenye zapiski Har'kovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta im. L. M. Kaganovicha. - Har'kov: Izdatel'stvo Har'kovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 1956. - Vyp. 7. - S. 3-18.
2. Demin A. V. Princip opredelennosti nalogooblozheniya : monogarfiya. - Moskva: Statut, 2015. - 366 s.
3. Nizhnik N. S., Bavsun M. V., Astafichev P. A., Aliev Ya. L., Kvitchuk A. S. Zakonnost' kak osnovopolagayuschee nachalo rossiyskogo prava : monografiya. - Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2021. - 328 s.
4. Nizhnik N. S. Socioyuridicheskiy fenomen «zakonnost'» v kontekste dialoga nauchnyh paradigm sovremennoy yurisprudencii / Geneticheskie zakonomernosti prava : sbornik nauchnyh trudov, posvyaschenyy 90-letiyu professora S. G. Drobyazko / gl. red. S. A. Balashenko. - Minsk: Biznesofset, 2013. - S. 22-30.
5. Bershickiy E. E. Pravovaya opredelennost' i ocenochnye kategorii: kratkiy ocherk na primere sostavov pravonarusheniy v razlichnyh otraslyah prava : monografiya. - Moskva: M-Logos, 2021. - 154 s.
6. Nizhnik N. S., Bavsun M. V., Aliev Ya. L., Astafichev P. A., Kvitchuk A. S. State and law: transformation vectors in modern conditions // SHS Web of Conferences. IX Baltic Legal Forum «Law and Order in the Third Millennium». - Kaliningrad, 2021. - R. 01015.
7. Nizhnik N. S., Aliev Ya. L. Doktrina yuridicheskogo prognozirovaniya: opredelenie scenariev razvitiya gosudarstvenno-pravovyh yavleniy / Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-processual'nogo prava (Sorokinskie chteniya): Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya / pod obsch. red. A. I. Kaplunova. - Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2021. - S. 133-138.
8. Gubaeva T. V., Gumerov L. A., Krasnov A. V. [i dr.]. Normy prava : teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie. - Moskva: Rossiyskaya akademiya pravosudiya, 2014. - 164 s.
9. Yavich L. S. Obschaya teoriya prava. - Leningrad, LGU im. A. A. Zhdanova, 1976. - 287 s.
10. Zayceva E. S. Ustanovlenie predelov pravovogo regulirovaniya v pravoprimenenii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2021. - T. 25. - № 4. - S. 59-70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2021/045.
11. Kuzbagarov A. N. Obyazatel'stva vsledstvie prichineniya vreda organami vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii : monografiya. - Moskva: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii imeni V. Ya. Kikotya, 2018. - 143 s.
12. Erdelevskiy A. M. Moral'nyy vred i kompensaciya za stradaniya : nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. - Moskva: Bek, 1997. - 173 s.
13. Savel'eva M. V. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost', voznikayuschaya iz prichineniya vreda nezakonnymi deystviyami sotrudnikov policii / Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del (posvyaschaetsya 25-letnemu yubileyu kafedry administrativnoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del) : materialy mezhvuzovskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2018. - S. 166-169.
