from 01.01.2007 to 01.01.2022
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
UDK 343 Уголовное право. Уголовное судопроизводство. Криминология. Криминалистика
BBK 67408 Уголовное право
TBK 7581 Уголовное право
BISAC LAW026000 Criminal Law / General
In order to assess the implementation of the principle of humanism in the criminal law policy of modern Russia, the author investigates the regulatory consolidation, doctrinal interpretation and legislative adjustments of the norms of the criminal law. For a correct understanding of the principle of humanism and clarification of its specifics in relation to the problem under consideration, a number of areas of state activity are identified within the framework of the implementation of criminal policy, formed in the form of successive stages of the fight against crime. Analysis of the change in the sanction, Part 1, Art. 204 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation made it possible to assert that it is proposed to refer to the actions of the legislator as «inconsistent, but in general meeting the requirements of the principle of humanism» as the most correct, whereas a number of legislative adjustments (for example, reduction of both the upper and lower limits of the fine multiplicity) «are within the limits» of humanistic principles, while other changes (for example, the increase of the maximum sentence of imprisonment from two to three years in the period from 2008 to 2016) can be called humane is rather debatable. An ambiguous assessment is given to the implementation of the principle of humanism in the context of legislative adjustments to circumstances mitigating and aggravating punishment. Facts of exclusion of repetition; adjustments of Part 1 of Art. 62 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as to the reduction of the imposed punishment when one of the actions provided for in paragraph “i” or paragraph “k” of Part 1 of Art. 61 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is committed, and regarding the scope of the imposed punishment from three quarters to two thirds; and a number of other legislative innovations can be attributed to manifestations of legislative humanism. At the same time, the inclusion in the list of aggravating circumstances of the commission of an deliberate crime by an employee of the internal affairs body, as well as the commission of a crime in order to promote, justify and support terrorism, is considered debatable as actions in accordance with the principle of humanism.
punishment, principle of humanism, criminal policy, criminal law policy, mitigating circumstances, aggravating circumstances
1. Babaev M. M., Pudovochkin Yu. E. Izmeneniya rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakona i ih ugolovno-politicheskaya ocenka // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 2012. - № 8. - S. 35-45.
2. Lopashenko N. A. Ugolovnaya politika. - Moskva: Volters Kluver, 2009. - 579 s.
3. Pobegaylo E. F. Ob uglublyayuschemsya krizise rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Sovremennye problemy ugolovnoy politiki : materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii (Krasnodar, 28-30 sentyabrya 2012 goda): v 2 t. / pod red. A. N. Il'yashenko. - T. 1. - Krasnodar: Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii. - 2012. - S. 14- 24.
4. Voplenko N. N. Ponyatie i klassifikaciya principov prava // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2014. - № 4. - S. 35- 48.
5. Lektorskiy V. A. Idealy i real'nost' gumanizma // Voprosy filosofii. - 1994. - № 6. - S. 22-28.
6. Miller V. I. Osmyslenie suschnosti fenomena «Pravo» v gumanisticheskoy tradicii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya. - 2017. - № 39. - S. 133-140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/39/14.
7. Miller V. I. Filosofskoe poznanie suschnosti i mnogoobraziya prirody prava i gumanizma // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya. - 2017. - № 40. - S. 122-131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/40/12.
8. Zagvyazinskiy V. I. Real'nyy gumanizm i tendencii razvitiya obrazovaniya // Obrazovanie i nauka. Izvestiya Ural'skogo nauchno-obrazovatel'nogo centra RAO. - 2000. - № 1. - S. 10-15.
9. Nigmatov Z. G. Principy gumanizma i aksiologii v obrazovanii // Obrazovanie i samorazvitie. - 2015. - № 2. - S. 138-144.
10. Ball G. A. Raciogumanizm kak forma sovremennogo gumanizma i ego znachenie dlya metodologii chelovekovedeniya // Mir psihologii. - 2013. - № 3. - S. 208-223.
11. Ball G. A. Psihologicheskie principy sovremennogo gumanizma // Voprosy psihologii. - 2009. - S. 3-12.
12. Pobegaylo E. F. Kriminologicheskaya obosnovannost' sovremennoy ugolovnoy politiki: problemnye voprosy i puti ih resheniya / sbornik trudov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy pamyati professorov kafedry ugolovnogo prava V. A. Eleonskogo i N. A. Ogurcova. - Ryazan': Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy, 2016. - 618 s. (S. 10-19).
13. Pobegaylo E. F. Problema gumanizacii rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v sovremennyh usloviyah // Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzglyad. - 2011. № 2. - S. 203-207.
14. Pobegaylo E. F. K voprosu o kriminologicheskoy obosnovannosti dal'neyshey gumanizacii rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Obschestvo & chelovek. - 2011. - № 1. - S. 68-71.
15. Greben'kov A. A. Alkogol'noe op'yanenie i agressivnoe povedenie cheloveka: ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy aspekty // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo. - 2012. - № 2. - S. 47- 51.
16. Endol'ceva A. V., Nikitin A. M. P'yanstvo, ego istoki i kriminologicheskaya suschnost' // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2013. - № 13. - S. 27-30.
17. Muromcev G. I., Sorochkin R. A. Problemy primeneniya p. «o» ch. 1 st. 63 UK RF v ramkah ugolovno-pravovogo mehanizma bor'by s korrupciey // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2012. - № S5. - S. 11-17.
18. Rarog A. I. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossii protiv terrorizma // Lex Russica (Russkiy Zakon). - 2017. - № 4. - S. 155-178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2017.125.4.155-178.
19. Ivancov S. V. Organizovannye formy terroristicheskoy i ekstremistskoy deyatel'nosti: reglamentaciya i realizaciya otvetstvennosti // Obschestvo i pravo. - 2016. - № 2. - S. 91-97.
20. Ul'yanova V. V. Problemy realizacii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za sodeystvie terroristicheskoy deyatel'nosti v forme finansirovaniya terrorizma // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2014. - № 3. - S. 442-447.
