Historical prerequisites for the development of other measures of a criminal law nature aimed at restricting the rights of persons committed crimes against the interests of the Russian Federation
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The relevance of the topic is due to the need for a retrospective analysis of individual measures of state enforcement in order to understand their criminal legal nature. The history of the development of other measures of a criminal law nature in relation to individual groups of crimes is practically not considered in the criminal law literature. Encroachments on the interests of the state the punishment for which has traditionally been one of the most severe among socially dangerous acts prohibited by criminal law are no excluded. Nevertheless, the analysis of historical sources shows that the limits of coercion in this area have changed over time significantly. The changes that took place were related to the policy of the state, namely the humanization of punishment - the mitigation of the means of influence used against persons guilty of committing crimes against the interests of the state. Today, this trend generally continues. Along with the rigidity of the approach, the authorities allow a compromise, reasonably believing that a different impact or border measures can ensure the effectiveness of prevention. Traditional methods were used in the study organizing - generalization, analysis, analogy. Results. The development of the criminal law science, as well as the humanism ideas dominance, the human resources economy, led to the implementation of a fundamentally different approach in the entire field of criminal law regulation. We believe that the further development of this area will allow us to determine new prospects for countering the crimes of the group under study.

Keywords:
system of punishments, means of influence, humanization, economy of repression, retrospective study
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Avdeev V. A. Prinuditel'nye raboty kak novyy vid nakazaniya v sisteme mer ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera // Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. - 2012. - № 6. - S. 100-101.

2. Anisimov E. V. Russkaya pytka. Politicheskiĭ sysk v Rossii XVIII veka. - Sankt-Peterburg: Norint, 2004.- 461 s.

3. Astahova N. Yu. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie 1903 g.: otvetstvennost' za organizaciyu i uchastie v prestupnyh soobschestvah // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. - 2013. - № 1. - S. 126-131.

4. Babkova G. O. Ugolovno-processual'nye zakonoproekty Ekateriny II i rossiĭskoe zakonodatel'stvo vtoroĭ poloviny XVIII v. (k istorii Ukaza «O treh rodah vorovstva» 1781 g. i «Ustava blagochiniya» 1782 g.) // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2015. - № 2. - S. 12-14.

5. Buklova V. A. Evolyucionnye osobennosti sistemy ugolovnogo nakazaniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossiyskoy imperii XIX v. // Social'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i processy. - 2009. - № 4. - S. 19-23.

6. Buldygerova L. N. Pravo Rossiyskoy Imperii (XVII-nachalo XX veka). - Habarovsk, 2019. - 288 s.

7. Vladimirskiĭ-Budanov M. F. Obzor istorii russkogo prava. - Sankt-Peterburg, 1892. - 712 s.

8. Grigor'ev O. V. Artikul voinskiy i «kratkoe izobrazhenie processov i sudebnyh tyazheb» kak osnova otpravleniya pravosudiya v russkoy armii v XVIII v. // Istoricheskaya i social'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl'. - 2018. - № 1. - S. 28-38.

9. Goryacheva E. M. Osobennosti administrativnogo i ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v sfere bor'by s inakomysliem v gody pravleniya Nikolaya I // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. - 2014. - № 3-2. - S. 111-119.

10. Egoshin O. A. Vidy nakazaniy v otnoshenii voennosluzhaschih i ih primenenie v epohu Petra I // Voprosy teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava. Mariyskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. - 2009. - № 7. - S. 43-55.

11. Efimenko I. A. Sostavy politicheskih prestupleniy v Ulozhenii o nakazaniyah ugolovnyh i ispravitel'nyh 1845 g. // Obschestvo i pravo. - 2010. - № 4. - S. 55-58.

12. Zagidullin M. R. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' v sudebnom processe Rossii po sudebnikam 1497 i 1550 g. // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya «gumanitarnye nauki». - 2019. - № 1. - S. 32-40.

13. Radischev A. N. Izbrannye filosofskie sochineniya. - Moskva: Gospolitizdat, 1949. - 559 s.

14. Luppova M. A. K voprosu o sisteme nakazaniy i praktika ee primeneniya po Sobornomu Ulozheniyu 1649 goda // Molodoy uchenyy. - 2021. - № 20. - S. 346-349.

15. Lyublinskiy P. I. Tehnika, tolkovanie i kazuistika ugolovnogo kodeksa. - Moskva: Zercalo-M, 2014. - 234 s.

16. Marasinova E. N. Smertnaya kazn' i politicheskaya smert' v Rossii serediny XVIII veka // Rossiĭskaya istoriya. - 2014. - № 4. - S. 53-69.

17. Nepomnyaschaya T. V. Inye mery ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera: ponyatie, yuridicheskaya priroda, sistema // Pravoprimenenie. - 2017. - № 1. - S. 118-119.

18. Novikova E. A. Pravovaya priroda ogranicheniya svobody // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2014. - № 8. - S. 1699-1700.

19. Pamyatniki russkogo prava : Pamyatniki prava perioda obrazovaniya Russkogo centralizovannogo gosudarstva XIV-XV vv. / sost.: V. N. Avtokratov, A. A. Zimin, S. M. Kashtanov, A. G. Polyak ; pod redakciey L. V. Cherepnina. - Moskva: Gosyurizdat, 1955. - Vyp. 3 - 527 s.

20. Savchenko D. A. Modernizaciya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva XIX veka ob otvetstvennosti za gosudarstvennye prestupleniya // Istoriko-pravovye problemy: novyy rakurs. - 2014. - № 9-1. - S. 231-249.

21. Skvoznikov A. N. Otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya i interesov gosudarstvennoy sluzhby po Sudebnikam 1497 i 1550 gg. // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Pravo». - 2012. - № 1. - S. 79-84 (82).

22. Stepanova O. V. Zarozhdenie novoy formy ssylki v Rossii v XVIII veke // Izvestiya Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni V. G. Belinskogo. - 2008. - № 6. - S. 79-84.

23. Tomsinov V. A. Zakonodatel'stvo imperatricy Ekateriny I: kommentariĭ. Opublikovano v izdanii: Zakonodatel'stvo Ekateriny I i Petra II (Seriya «Russkoe yuridicheskoe nasledie») / sostavitel' i avtor vstupitel'nyh stateĭ V. A. Tomsinov. - Moskva: Zercalo, 2009. - S. XIII-XXIII.

24. Tomsinov V. A. Sobornoe ulozhenie 1649 goda kak pamyatnik russkoĭ yurisprudencii. Opublikovano v izdanii: Sobornoe ulozhenie 1649 goda. Zakonodatel'stvo carya Alekseya Mihaĭlovicha / sostavitel', avtor predisloviya i vstupitel'nyh stateĭ V. A. Tomsinov. - Moskva: Zercalo, 2011. - S. 1-52.

25. Chirskova I. M. Sysk i nakazaniya «vorov» i «razboĭnikov» v pravovoĭ kul'ture perioda carstvovaniya Elizavety Petrovny // Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta: Literaturovedenie. Yazykoznanie. Kul'turologiya. - 2020. - № 8. - S. 41-42.

26. Uporov I. V. Teoriya ugolovnogo nakazaniya v Rossii: ot ekaterininskogo «Nakaza» do sistemnyh issledovaniĭ nachala XIX veka // Gumanitarnyy nauchnyy vestnik. - 2017. - № 7. - S. 19-25.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?