from 01.01.2020 until now
Tambov, Russian Federation
UDK 342.2 Структура государства
Introduction: The article is devoted to the analysis of the legal category of «internal affairs bodies» and related categories that specify the composition of state apparatus. Rationale is determined by the provisions of theoretical and doctrinal nature, which vaguely formulate the concept of «internal affairs bodies», based on the formal–legal criterion and substantive features of the law enforcement segment of the state apparatus. Methods: When analyzing theoretical provisions of the doctrine, which reveal the concepts under study, comparative analysis and method of historical normative acts analysis were used. Statutory documents of by-law nature that define the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs were considered. Results: Formal and substantive (material) criteria defining the system of internal affairs bodies are identified. Formal criteria include fixing the system of internal affairs bodies in normative and administrative acts, departmental organization of internal affairs bodies’ management. Substantive criteria include law enforcement functions performed by internal affairs bodies; the presence of paramilitary units within them; specific features of the public service in the internal affairs agencies.The link between the indicated category and the implementation of the concept of powers separation (separation of the executive branch of power) is noted as well as uncertainty in the historical–legal retrospective sphere of the status of internal affairs bodies as subordinate to the Ministry of Internal Affairs; the dominance of the formal criterion of definition over the substantive one;uncertainty as to the status of some functionally related parts of the state apparatus outside the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs system.
state apparatus, executive power, Ministry of Internal Affairs, internal affairs bodies, law enforcement agencies
1. Gutieva I. G. K voprosu o sodeystvii organam vnutrennih del (policii) i inym pravoohranitel'nym organam // Otechestvennaya yurisprudenciya. - 2017. - № 11 (25). - S. 51-54.
2. Gutieva I. G., Kodzokova L. A. Mesto organov vnutrennih del v sisteme organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti i ih vzaimodeystvie s inymi organami // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2022. - № 4 (167) . - S. 382-383.
3. Zheludkov M. A. Nekotorye problemy sovershenstvovaniya preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti v rossiyskom obschestve // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: gumanitarnye nauki. - 2007. - № 2 (46). - S. 108-111.
4. Zheludkov M. A. Osobennosti informacionnogo obespecheniya deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del po protivodeystviyu ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. - 2007. - № 3 (4). - S. 146-149.
5. Zahvatov I. Yu., Potapova S. A., Sudolova L. A. K voprosu o mehanizme vzaimodeystviya organov vnutrennih del s regional'nymi organami gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Zakon i pravo. - 2022. - № 10. - S. 167-171.
6. Manukyan A. R. Organy vnutrennih del kak chast' sistemy organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2022. - № 6 (169). - S. 380-381.
7. Pisarev A. S. Organy doznaniya v sisteme organov vnutrennih del // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2007. - № 5. - S. 84-87.
8. Rahmatullin A. F. Osobennosti pravovogo statusa sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del kak predstaviteley pravoohranitel'nyh organov sovremennoy Rossii // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2012. - № 4(20). - S. 186-188.
9. Selyutin A. V. Podsledstvennost' kak forma vneshnego vyrazheniya razgranicheniya kompetencii gosudarstvennyh organov i dolzhnostnyh lic pri osuschestvlenii ugolovno-processual'noy deyatel'nosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. - 2010. - № 1. - S. 171-174.
10. Sidorkin Yu. V. Problema «blagochiniya» v teorii i praktike policeyskoy deyatel'nosti dorevolyucionnoy Rossii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2019. - № 1 (45). - S. 254-260.
11. Sidorkin Yu. V. Vozniknovenie i razvitie ponyatiya «blagochinie» v pravoohranitel'noy sfere Rossiyskoy imperii // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. - 2017. - Tom 7. - № 4A. - S. 40-46.
12. Starilov Yu. N. O policeyskom prave, ili Ne vsegda horosho zabytoe staroe yavlyaetsya novym // Policeyskoe pravo. - 2005. - № 1. - S. 12-19.
13. Suprun S. V. Organy doznaniya MVD Rossii: central'nyy apparat MVD Rossii kak organ vnutrennih del v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Sovremennoe pravo. - 2020. - № 6. - S. 134-140.
14. Teteryuk A. G. Razgranichenie podsledstvennosti mezhdu organami vnutrennih del na transporte i territorial'nymi organami vnutrennih del, territorial'naya nesoglasovannost' // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2015. - № 2 (30). - S. 105-109.
15. Futo S. R. Policeyskie funkcii organov vnutrennih del v nalogovoy sfere kak «nasledstvo» federal'nyh organov nalogovoy policii // Policeyskoe pravo. - 2005. - № 3 (3). - S. 48-51.
16. Shkarevskiy D. N. Regulirovanie deyatel'nosti organov lagernoy yusticii SSSR (1944-1956) // Pravo: istoriya i sovremennost'. - 2021. - № 3 (16). - S. 51-63.
