Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 343.95 Судебная психология. Уголовная психология
The scientific discussion that has been going on in recent decades about the possibility and admissibility of examination of the reliability of testimony demands the study of some leading foreign countries experience, where such examination has long become a fact of practical jurisprudence. The goal of the study is to analyse the theoretical insights of German scientists and experts into the most resonant facts from the perspective of modern psychological expertise. The object of the study is the case of the Reichstag fire, 1933. Marinus van der Lubbe, a worker from the Dutch Leiden, was accused of setting the Reichstag on fire and then sentenced to death. In 2007 the law on “Abolition of unjust judgments of the national socialist regime” (1998) granted a pardon to van der Lubbe without revision au fond. To this day, there are disputes about the involvement of van der Lubbe in organizing the arson and his guilt. The German psychologist Hartmut Böhm made an attempt to evaluate van der Lubbe’s testimony from the perspective of modern psychology and forensic psychological examination of the reliability of testimony. The article briefly outlines some results of this attempt to give a general idea of the logic of the developed and recognized tools applied.
psychology of testimony, forensic psychological examination, reliability of testimony, Germany, Reichstag fire
1. Auväärt L., Jengalõtšev V. Kohtupsühholoogiaekspertiis : monograafia. - Tartu: Trükitud Trükikojas Greif, 2018. - 340 Lk.
2. Dozorceva E. G., Afanas'eva A. G. Ocenka dostovernosti svidetel'skih pokazaniy nesovershennoletnih [Elektronnyy resurs] // Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya. - 2015. - T. 4. № 3. - S. 47-56. doi:https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2015040306.
3. Egorova T. M. Sudovo-psihologіchna ekspertiza komunіkativnoї dіyal'nostі osobi, zafіksovanoї na vіdeozapisі slіdchoї dії, yak noviy vid doslіdzhen' // Aktual'nі pitannya sudovoї ekspertizi ta krimіnalіstiki : zb. mater. zasіdannya «kruglogo stolu», prisvyachenogo 85-rіchchyu stvorennya Harkіvs'kogo naukovo-doslіdnogo іnstitutu sudovih ekspertiz іm. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokarіusa, 11-12 list. - 2008 r. - H., 2008. - S. 347-351.
4. Engalychev V. F., Kravcova G. K., Holopova E. N. Sudebnaya psihologicheskaya ekspertiza po vyyavleniyu priznakov dostovernosti / nedostovernosti informacii, soobschaemoy uchastnikami ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (po videozapisyam sledstvennyh deystviy i operativno-razysknyh meropriyatiy) : monografiya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2016. - 328 s.
5. Slavgorodskaya O. A. K voprosu o dostovernosti pokazaniy svidetelya // Vestnik Baltiyskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obschestvennye nauki. - 2019. - № 1 [Elektronnyy resurs] // cyberleninka.ru : sayt - URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosuo-dostovernosti-pokazaniy-svidetelya (data obrascheniya: 16.01.2023).
6. Mahmudova H. T. Sud-psihologik ekspertizaning turlari va rivozhlanish yunalishnari : monografiya. - Toshkent: Ўzbekiston Respublikasi IIV Akademiyasi, 2020. - 288 s.
7. Molodochkina V. V., Tuhkanen V. O. Sudebno-psihologicheskaya ekspertiza sposobnosti nesovershennoletnego svidetelya ili poterpevshego pravil'no vosprinimat' obstoyatel'stva, imeyuschie znachenie dlya dela, i davat' pokazaniya // Novye impul'sy razvitiya: voprosy nauchnyh issledovaniy. - 2020. - № 1-2 [Elektronnyy resurs] // cyberleninka.ru : sayt - URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sudebno-psihologicheskaya-ekspertiza-sposobnosti-nesovershennoletnego-svidetelya-ili-poterpevshegopravilno-vosprinimat (data obrascheniya: 16.01.2023).
8. Harlamova O. A. Aktual'nye voprosy proizvodstva otdel'nyh vidov sudebnyh ekspertiz // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. - 2018. - № 1 [Elektronnyy resurs] // cyberleninka.ru : sayt - URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktualnye-voprosy-proizvodstva-otdelnyh-vidov-sudebnyhekspertiz (data obrascheniya: 16.01.2023).
9. Backes U., Janssen K.-H., Jesse E., Köhler H., Mommsen H., Tobias F. Reichstagsbrand - Aufklärung einer historischen Legende. - Zürich München: R. Piper GmbH & Co KG, 1986. - 326 S.
10. Pfäfflin F. Zur Aufhebung des Todesurteils gegen den Reichstagsbrandstifter Marinus van der Lubbe durch den Generalbundesanwalt am 6. Dezember // Recht & Psychiatrie. - 2008. - № 26. - S. 106-118.
11. Shirer U. Fashizaciya Germanii: 1933-1934 gody // Vzlet i padenie Tret'ego reyha = The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. - Moskva: Voenizdat, 1991. - T. 1. - 653 s.
12. Steller M. Vier Jahrzehnte forensische Aussagepsychologie: eine nicht nur persönliche Geschichte // Praxis der Rechtspsychologie. - 2013. - № 23 (1). - S. 11-32.
13. Steller M. Stand und Herausforderungen der Aussagepsychologie // Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie. - 2020. - 14 (2). - S. 188-196.
14. Böhm H. Marinus van der Lubbe und der Reichstagsbrand - Aussagepsychologisches und kriminologisches Nachdenken // Praxis der Rechtspsychologie. - 2013. - № 23 (1). - S. 166-186.
15. Engalychev V. F. Situacionno-psihologicheskiy analiz obstoyatel'stv smerti podsledstvennogo v sledstvennom izolyatore, imeyuschey priznaki suicida / Psihologiya XXI veka: vyzovy, poiski, vektory razvitiya : sbornik materialov IV Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma psihologov, Ryazan', 7-8 aprelya 2022 goda. - Ryazan': Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy, 2022. - S. 241-245.
