UDK 343.13 Уголовно-процессуальное право
Introduction. The article deals with the procedure of producing subsequent judicial control. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of problematic aspects of the legislatively specified list of investigative actions, with regard to which the judicial control is implemented in according to part 5 of article 165 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation (CCP), the participation of concerned persons in the court hearing on considering the legality and reasonability of the investigative action, as well as to the legal norms and provisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation relating to the implementation of the considered type of judicial control. The relevance of the chosen research subject is determined by theoretical and applied issues related to the lack of an optimal mechanism for implementing subsequent judicial control over making investigative actions, legislative shortcomings and discordance of judicial practice. Research methods. The article is based on both general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, generalisation, system-structural approach) and private scientific methods of research (interpretation of legal norms, legal forecasting, generalisation and analysis of judicial practice). The results of the research are reflected in the development of normative and scientific provisions to normalise practices of justice proceeding in the field of subsequent judicial control over the legality and reasonability of investigative actions.
subsequent judicial control, criminal proceedings, part 5 of article 165 of the CCP, investigative actions, investigator, procedural order
1. Lozhkin V. A. Predmet i predely dokazyvaniya pri realizacii predvaritel'nogo i posleduyuschego sudebnogo kontrolya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve / Perspektivy razvitiya social'noy sfery i ekonomiki regiona v processe perehoda na innovacionnyy put' razvitiya: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Bryansk, 10-12 yanvarya 2017 goda / pod nauch. red. S. L. Lozhkinoy, G. A. Kulikovoy. - Bryansk: OOO «Novyy proekt», 2017. - S. 222-226.
2. Umyarova R. R. O perechne sledstvennyh deystviy, podlezhaschih sudebnomu kontrolyu v ramkah st. 165 UPK RF // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta kooperacii. - 2022. - № 4 (50). - S. 135-138.
3. Balakshin V. S., Grigor'ev A. I. Neotlozhnye sledstvennye deystviya: ponyatie i perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Elektronnoe prilozhenie k «Rossiyskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu». - 2017. - № 6. - S. 98-104.
4. Osipov A. V. Normativnaya model' isklyuchitel'nyh sluchaev, pri kotoryh proizvodstvo sledstvennyh deystviy ne terpit otlagatel'stva // Izvestiya AltGU. - 2012. - № 2 (74). - S. 124-128.
5. Nikiforova H. P. K voprosu o sudebnom kontrole zakonnosti i obosnovannosti proizvodstva sledstvennyh deystviy, ogranichivayuschih konstitucionnye prava i svobody lichnosti // Vestnik OGU. - 2015. - № 3 (178). - S. 120-125.
6. Rossinskiy S. B. Sledstvennye deystviya : monografiya. - Moskva: Norma-Infra-M, 2023. - 240 s.
7. Serebrov D. O. Sudebnyy kontrol' za zakonnost'yu i obosnovannost'yu proizvodstva sledstvennyh deystviy, ogranichivayuschih konstitucionnye prava i svobody lichnosti : monografiya. - Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2006. - 222 s.
8. Kovtun N. N. Sudebnyy kontrol' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii : monografiya. Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya, 2002. - 332 s.
9. Adil'shaev E. A. Problema uchastiya storony zaschity i inyh lic pri proverke sudom zakonnosti provedennyh vvidu neotlozhnosti sledstvennyh deystviy kak osobennost' realizacii principa obespecheniya podozrevaemomu i obvinyaemomu prava na zaschitu v sudebnom sankcionirovanii // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i pravo». - 2011. - № 3. - S. 133- 135.
10. Dolginov S. D. Osmotr zhilischa: ugolovno-processual'nye aspekty // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. - 2009. - № 3 (5). - S. 58-62.
11. Yanovskiy R. S. Nekotorye aktual'nye voprosy proizvodstva osmotra mesta proisshestviya v zhilische // Aktual'nye voprosy bor'by s prestupleniyami. - 2016. - № 2. - S. 26-29.
12. Morugina N. A., Sidorova E. I. Obysk: ponyatie, nekotorye vidy i osobennosti proizvodstva v sovremennyh usloviyah // Vestnik VI MVD Rossii. - 2022. - № 3. - S. 245-250.
13. Serebrov D. O. Predvaritel'nyy i posleduyuschiy sudebnyy kontrol' pri prinyatii resheniya o proizvodstve obyska v zhilische, lichnogo obyska / Problemy yuridicheskoy nauki v issledovaniyah doktorantov, ad'yunktov i soiskateley. - Vyp. 9. - Ch. 2. - Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2003. - S. 41-49.
14. Gadzhiramazanova P. K., Gasanov M. Sh. Organizaciya i proizvodstvo vyemki i obyska v ugolovnom processe // Zakon i pravo. - 2021. - № 12. - S. 137-140.
15. Kovtun N. N. Operativnye sudebno-kontrol'nye proizvodstva, realizuemye po pravilam stat'i 165 UPK RF // Ugolovnyy process. - 2010. - № 1 (61). - S. 8-16.
