Kalinigrad, Russian Federation
UDK 342.9 Административное право
Introduction. The author considers the main contradictions of legal regulation of the institute of guilt of a legal entity in administrative law. The relevance of the problem is due to the lack of legislative certainty in the construction of the guilt of a legal entity, which leads to ambiguous law enforcement practice, violation of the principles of justice and presumption of innocence in bringing the specified subject to administrative responsibility. The purpose of the article is to analyse the ‘models’ of guilt of a legal entity in administrative, tax, civil legislation, as well as to identify the problem of harmonisation of current legislation, law enforcement practice, including in order to change the vector of fiscal orientation of state policy when bringing to administrative responsibility of a legal entity. Methods. General scientific (analysis, synthesis, systematisation) and private-scientific (formal-legal, comparative-legal) methods of scientific cognition allowed to rethink theoretical, practical aspects and approaches to the definition of guilt of a legal entity in administrative law. Results. The main problems of legal regulation of the institute of guilt in administrative law are formulated in this research. It seems that in order to bring law enforcement practice in line with the fundamental principles of administrative responsibility – legality, fairness, presumption of innocence – the guilt of a legal entity, as a legal category needs to be harmonised. The legislative construction of the model of guilt of a legal entity should ensure that the balance of private and public interests of the state is observed for the purpose of economic and political stability.
the guilt of a legal entity, ‘behavioural’ and ‘psychological’ concepts, will of a legal entity, substratum of a legal entity, synergy, state administrative supervision, balance of private and public interests
1. Panova I. V. Esche raz o dvuh tendenciyah, razrushayuschih celostnost' instituta administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 2007. – № 8. – S. 1–30.
2. Trubin E. M. Vina yuridicheskogo lica. Zametki ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti. // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul'tantPlyus» : [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=CJI&n=34045#EiLcbIU4MNFEHylq1 (data obrascheniya: 15.02.2024).
3. Panov A. B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic : monografiya. – Moskva: Norma, 2019. – 192 s.
4. Sorokin V. D. Izbrannye trudy / predisl.: D. N. Bahrah, V. V. Denisenko. – Sankt-Peterburg: Yuridicheskiy centr Press, 2004. – 665 s.
5. Rossinskiy B. V. Administrativno-pravovye aspekty gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v Rossii : Sistemnye podhody : monografiya. – Moskva: Norma, 2023. – 168 s.
6. Ochered'ko V. P., Kokorin I. S. Ot teoreticheskoy neopredelennosti k protivorechivosti sudebnoy praktiki pri opredelenii viny i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskih lic // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2015. – № 4. – S. 267–277.
7. Zaharov D. N. Ponyatie voli yuridicheskogo lica i problema otvetstvennosti // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. – 2005. – № 7. – S. 69–72.
8. Tolstoy Yu. K. Soderzhanie i grazhdansko-pravovaya zaschita prava sobstvennosti v SSSR. – Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1955. – 220 c.
9. Latifskiy V. I., Semykina O. I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic v otechestvennom zakonodatel'stve: k istorii voprosa “pro at contra” // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2014. – № 2 (206). – S. 5–13.
10. Tagancev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo : v 2 ch. – Moskva: Yurayt, 2024. – Ch. 1. – 414 s.
11. Zyryanov S. M. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskih lic // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2015. – № 6. – S. 79–85.
12. Kvashis V. E., Sluchevskaya Yu. A. Institut ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskih lic kak novyy etap razvitiya ugolovnogo prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2016. – № 12 (240). – S. 79–90.
13. Solovey Yu. P. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti nuzhdaetsya v sovershenstvovanii // Vestnik universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA). – 2014. – № 2 (2). – S. 56–63.
14. Kaplunov A. I. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak forma administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 518–524; https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2019-16-4-518-524.
15. Rossinskiy B. V. Vnov' o vine yuridicheskogo lica // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2015. – № 6. – S. 139–143.
16. Martynov A. V. Administrativnyy nadzor v Rossii: teoreticheskie osnovy postroeniya : monografiya / pod nauch. red. Yu. N. Starilova. – Moskva: Yuniti, 2010. – 183 s.
