Russian Federation
UDK 342 Государственное право. Конституционное право. Административное право
Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the role of modern constitutional law in the system of sectoral legal sciences. The author notes that jurisprudence in general is a formal science, the subject of which are formal systems, which, mainly, it postulates itself - specific branches of law. Until a certain period (the formation of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the adoption of the new Constitution of the Russian Federation) state law could also be considered as a sectoral science, the subject of which was mostly the system of state power organisation. However, unlike mathematics (which is also a formal science), jurisprudence possesses regulatory potential and relates to the impact on human behavior. In this way it cannot be encapsulated exclusively in the system of legal constructions outside the «life world». Research methods. A set of methods was used in the work: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, dialectical approach, method of comparative jurisprudence. Results. The author proves that the special role of constitutional law in the modern stage of development is that, on the one hand, through processes of constitutionalisation of other branches of law constitutional law claims to be a general system. In a certain sense, the science of constitutional law is gradually taking the place of theory of law in legal epistemology.
jurisprudence, formal science, theory of law, dogma of the right, philosophy of law, life world, constitutional law, state law, constitutionalism
1. Vishnoveckaya S. V. K voprosu o naznachenii metodologii nauki trudovogo prava // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. – 2013. – № 3 (21). – S. 58–64.
2. Muromcev S. A. Chto takoe dogma prava? / Sochineniya. – Moskva: Tipografiya A. I. Mamontova i Ko, 1885. – 35 s.
3. Alekseev S. S. Pravo: azbuka – teoriya – filosofiya : Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya : monografiya. – Moskva: Statut, 1999. – 709 s.
4. Tarasov N. N. K voprosu o predmete obschey teorii prava i teoreticheskih ponyatiyah // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2015. – № 6 (105). – S. 9–21.
5. Muromcev S. A. Opredelenie i osnovnoe razdelenie prava / vstup. stat'ya, komment. Yu. I. Grevcova. – 2-e izd., dop. – Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'skiy dom Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2004. – 223 s.
6. Ogleznev V. V., Surovcev V. A. Konstituciya kak aksiomaticheskaya sistema // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. – 2015. – № 5. – S. 3–8.
7. Dzhagaryan A. A., Dzhagaryan N. V. Rossiyskiy konstitucionalizm: k obreteniyu ideala // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2013. – № 3 (195). – S. 131–141.
8. Kozhevina M. A. Razmyshleniya o predmetnoy opredelennosti nauchnyh special'nostey i formirovanii novyh yuridicheskih nauk // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2021. – № 5 (140). – S. 18–24; https://doi.org/10.34076/20713797_2021_5_18.
9. Alekseev S. S. Filosofiya prava: istoriya i sovremennost'. Problemy. Tendencii. Perspektivy. – Moskva: Norma, 1997. – 329 s.
10. Ershov V. V. Parnye kategorii «opredelennost' prava» i «neopredelennost' prava» / Opredelennost' i neopredelennost' prava kak parnye kategorii: problemy teorii i praktiki : materialy XII mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii: v 3‑h ch., 17–21 aprelya 2017 g. – Moskva: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet pravosudiya, 2018. – Ch. I. – S. 12–42.
11. Velieva D. S., Presnyakov M. V. Suschnost' principa pravovoy opredelennosti: v poiskah konstitucionno-pravovogo smysla // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo. – 2019. – T. 19, № 3. – S. 302–309.
12. Dreyshev B. V. Pravovaya bezopasnost' i problemy ee obespecheniya // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. – 1998. – № 2 (221). – S. 11–19.
13. Bobrova N. A. Konstitucionnye i gosudarstvenno-pravovye otnosheniya: odna ili dve otrasli prava? // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. – 2020. – № 36. – S. 16–29; https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/36/2.
14. Kruss V. I. Konstitucionnoe pravoponimanie i praktiko-orientiruyuschaya sostoyatel'nost' sovremennoy teorii prava // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. – 2018. – № 11. – S. 5–12.
15. Presnyakov M. V. Pryamoe deystvie Konstitucii Rossiyskoy Federacii i ee otraslevaya interpretaciya // Grazhdanin i pravo. – 2014. – № 11. – S. 3–14.
16. Presnyakov M. V. Chelovek i ego prava kak vysshaya cennost': o probleme opredelennosti cheloveka v yuridicheskoy kartine mira / Pravo i prava cheloveka v sovremennom mire: tendencii, riski, perspektivy razvitiya : materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy pamyati professora F. M. Rudinskogo, Moskva, 15 aprelya 2021 g. / pod obsch. red. V. V. Stroeva, D. A. Pashenceva, N. M. Ladnushkinoy. – Saratov: Saratovskiy istochnik, 2021. – S. 45–48.
