from 01.01.2008 until now
Sankt-Peterburg, Russian Federation
Sankt-Peterburg
UDK 343.611 Умышленное убийство
Introduction. A team of scientists from St. Petersburg State University, with the support of the Russian Science Foundation, carries out a set of studies within the framework of the project “Legal regulation of countering domestic violence in the Russian Federation”. A separate block monitors studies of the practice of applying criminal legislation in cases of domestic violence. One of the monitoring studies is devoted to the analysis of the application of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Research methods. According to a random sample, 69 judicial acts on murder cases issued by the first instance courts of the Russian Federation during the period 2020-2023 and posted in the public domain, were studied. Results. In the course of the study, it was found that the greatest difficulties in qualifying domestic murders is the question of delineation of an attempted murder from crimes with related modus operandi, and the main problem is the assessment of the direction of the perpetrator's intent. According to the results of the study, the authors concluded that additional clarifications of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are necessary: 1) it should be pointed out that positive behaviour at the stage of the completed attempted murder should be regarded as post-criminal behaviour; 2) it is advisable to emphasise the situation of the completed attempted murder in the case when there is a commission of actions in which the perpetrator foresees the inevitability of death. It makes sense to give examples of such actions: striking with the help of weapons or objects replacing them, blows to the area of vital organs (head, neck, heart area), etc.; 3) it is also required to indicate that the very fact of committing such actions, if death has not occurred, is qualified as an attempted murder, regardless of the subsequent behaviour of the perpetrator (including the termination of actions aimed at depriving life, providing assistance to the victim).
an attempted murder, qualification of a crime, domestic violence, assessment of intent, monitoring of the practice of applying criminal law
1. Popov A. N. Ubiystva pri otyagchayuschih obstoyatel'stvah. – Sankt-Peterburg: Yuridicheskiy centr Press, 2003. – 898 s.
2. Lopashenko N. A. Ubiystva : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 540 s.
3. Iovenko A. R., Karpusheva A. N. Osobennosti otgranicheniya osnovnogo sostava ubiystva ot smezhnyh sostavov // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2023. – №12. – S. 500–502.
4. Kraev D. Yu. Ubiystvo, sopryazhennoe s drugimi prestupleniyami : (p. p. «v», «z», «k» ch. 2 st. 105 UK RF) : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2021. – 375 s.
5. Kraev D. Yu. Ubiystvo pri otyagchayuschih obstoyatel'stvah (p.p. «v», «g», «e1», «k», «l», «m» ch. 2 st. 105 UK RF) : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2012. – 376 s.
6. Korobeev A. I. Prestupnye posyagatel'stva na zhizn' i zdorov'e cheloveka : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2012. – 317 s.
7. Kazakova V. A. Inye prestupleniya, klassificiruemye po stepeni tyazhesti prichineniya vreda zdorov'yu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. – 2018. – № 4. – S. 191–197.
8. Skachkova N. P. Problemy kvalifikacii nekotoryh prestupleniy protiv lichnosti pri konkurencii sostavov prestupleniy // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 178–180.
9. Borodin S. V., Malinin V. B. Ubiystvo – obschaya harakteristika : monografiya. – Sankt-Peterburg: MIEP pri MPA EvrAzES, 2013. – 196 s.
10. Gelyahova L. A., Mashekuasheva M. H. K voprosu ob ugolovno-pravovoy harakteristike ubiystv // Pravo i upravlenie. – 2023. – № 3. – S. 191–194; https://doi.org/10.24412/2224-9133-2023-3-191-194.
11. Yakushin V. A. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikacii ubiystv // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatischeva. – 2015. – № 2 (82). – S. 211–230.
12. Popov A. N. Razgranichenie prestupleniy protiv zhizni so smezhnymi sostavami po priznakam viny // Kriminalist'. – 2014. – № 2 (15). – S. 3–11.
13. Zhdanov Yu. A. O roli prichinyaemogo vreda zdorov'yu cheloveka pri sovershenii pokusheniya na ubiystvo // Zakon i pravo. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 78–80.
14. Bavsun M. V., Vishnyakova N. V. Vliyanie napravlennosti umysla na kvalifikaciyu ubiystv, sovershaemyh pri otyagchayuschih obstoyatel'stvah // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2006. – № 1. – S. 7–10.
15. Ignatov A. N. Diskussionnye voprosy kvalifikacii ubiystv // Obschestvo i pravo. – 2009. – № 2 (24). – S. 85–89.
16. Sardak D. B., Bragin K. S. Problemy otgranicheniya ugrozy ubiystvom ot pokusheniya na ubiystvo // Zakon i pravo. – 2021. – № 9. – S. 118–119.
17. Mezencev I. V. Ugroza ubiystvom i pokushenie na ubiystvo: aspekty kvalifikacii / Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: vchera, segodnya, zavtra : materialy ezhegodnoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, 9–10 iyunya 2023 g., Sankt-Peterburg. – Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2023. – S. 174–176.
18. Minyuhin N. K. Razgranichenie pokusheniya na ubiystvo ot umyshlennogo prichineniya tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu // Zakonnost' i pravoporyadok. – 2016. – № 1–2 (14). – S. 41–42.
