Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 340.11 Сущность, методология и элементы права
Introduction. The requirement to establish the limits of legal regulation arises in the implementation of various types of legal activities, such as law-making, interpretive and lawenforcement ones. A special place in setting the limits of legal regulation in the interpretation activity is occupied by the highest judicial courts – the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The aim of the research: to identify the peculiarities and significance of setting the limits of legal regulation in the interpretation activity of higher courts. The methods of research: general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction, analogy, system-structural, etc.) and private-scientific (comparative-legal, formal-legal, method of interpretation of legal norms, etc.). Results. The setting of the limits of legal regulation in the interpretative activity carried out by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has its own peculiarities both in relation to law-making activity and in relation to each other. The peculiarities of setting the limits of legal regulation in this type of activity of the highest judicial courts are their secondary nature and form of reflection (interpretative acts with normative content).Secondary defines the specificity of the criteria, which will differ significantly from the criteria for identifying and setting the limits of legal regulation in lawmaking activities. In the activities of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the criteria for establishing the limits of legal regulation are constitutional and legal values and (or) principles, while in the activities of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation - exclusively the principles of law as they are enshrined and reflected in the current legislation. The requirement to establish the limits of legal regulation in the interpretative activity is conditioned by uncertainty as one of the properties of law and can be expressed in two forms: positive and negative. The vision of the limits of legal regulation by the highest judicial instances is important for both the legislator and the law enforcer.
limits of legal regulation, interpretative activity, higher judicial courts, interpretation of law, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
1. Rabinovich P. M. Sfery i predely pravovogo regulirovaniya: ponyatie, vidy, faktory razvitiya / XXVII s'ezd KPSS i razvitie teorii gosudarstva i prava : mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnyh trudov. – Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovskiy yuridicheskiy institut, 1987. – S. 55–59.
2. Berezina E. A. Predely pravovogo regulirovaniya obschestvennyh otnosheniy: problemy ponimaniya, klassifikaciya i znachenie v mehanizme pravovogo regulirovaniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. – 2020. – T. 15, № 4 (113). – S. 42–55; https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.042-055.
3. Anishina V. I. Resheniya rossiyskih sudov v sisteme pravoregulirovaniya: nekotorye problemy teorii i praktiki // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2007. – № 7. – S. 57–63.
4. Sudebnaya vlast' / T. E. Abova [i dr.] ; pod red. I. L. Petruhina. – Moskva: Prospekt, 2003. – 720 s.
5. Anishina V. I. Postanovleniya Plenumov vysshih sudov Rossiyskoy Federacii: pravovaya priroda, mesto i rol' v pravovoy sisteme // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2008. – № 5. – S. 4–8.
6. Vereschagin A. N. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v Rossii: sravnitel'no-pravovye aspekty : [monografiya]. – Moskva: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2004. – 340 s.
7. Chetvernin V. A., Yurko G. B. Sudebnye istochniki prava / Ezhegodnik libertarno-yuridicheskoy teorii : [sbornik statey].– Moskva: TEIS, 2007. – Vyp. 1. – S. 154–184.
8. Demidov V. V. O roli i znachenii Postanovleniy Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 1998. – № 3. – URL: https://www.vsrf.ru/files/11552/?ysclid=m0qitmcyg8194354626 (data obrascheniya: 20.06.2024).
9. Neshataeva T. N. K voprosu ob istochnikah prava – sudebnom precedente i doktrine / Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava : [sbornik statey] / B. N. Topornin, E. Serveren [i dr.]. – Moskva: Yurist', 2000. – S. 91–97.
10. Pobedkin A. V. Postanovleniya Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii kak forma tolkovaniya i preodoleniya probelov ugolovno-processual'nogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2008. – № 11. – S. 34–44.
11. Epov A. G. Sudebnye resheniya po delam ob abstraktnom normokontrole kak akty «negativnogo» pravotvorchestva: diskussionnye voprosy teorii i praktiki // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2011. – № 2 (77). – S. 59–66.
12. Nersesyanc V. S. U rossiyskih sudov net pravotvorcheskih polnomochiy / Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava : [sbornik statey] / B. N. Topornin, E. Serveren [i dr.]. – Moskva: Yurist', 2000. – S. 107–111.
13. Syryh V. M. Materialisticheskaya filosofiya publichnogo prava : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2016. – 573 s.
14. Saulyak O. P. Zakonnost' i pravoporyadok: na puti k novym paradigmam. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2009. – 220 s.
15. Ershov V. V. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo: pro et contra // Pravosudie. – 2020. –T. 2, № 1. – S. 7–35; https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2686-9241.2020.1.7-35.
16. Kolokolov N. A. «Sudebnye praktiki» v ugolovnom processe otvergnut' ili, uporyadochiv, legalizovat'? / Ugolovno-processual'noe pravo: ponyatie, soderzhanie, istochniki : materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya prof. D. S. Kareeva, Moskva, 23–24 marta 2006 g. – Moskva: Gorodec, 2006. – S. 66–68.
17. Abramova A. I. Podzakonnoe pravotvorchestvo v sovremennom ponimanii: realii i perspektivy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2019. – № 8. – S. 25–35; https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2019.8.3.
18. Voplenko N. N. O ponyatii i funkciyah pravotvorcheskogo tolkovaniya // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. – 2003. – № 1. – S. 72–80.
19. Sivickiy V. A., Teryukova E. Yu. Resheniya Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii kak istochniki konstitucionnogo prava // Vestnik Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 1997. – № 3. – S. 73–79.
20. Lazarev V. V. Tolkovanie prava: klassika, modern i postmodern // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2016. – № 8. – S. 15–28.
21. Germer V. N., Ivanov S. A. Interpretacionnye akty Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii v sisteme pravovogo regulirovaniya // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. – 2023. – № 1. – S. 53–56; https://doi.org/10.24412/2414-3995-2023-1-53-56.
22. Vereschagin A. N., Karapetov A. G., Tay Yu. V. Puti sovershenstvovaniya pravotvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 4–81.
23. Vlasenko N. A. Neopredelennost' v prave: ponyatie i puti issledovaniya // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. – 2006. – № 7. – S. 32–44.
24. Momotov V. V. Tolkovanie pravovyh norm Verhovnym Sudom Rossiyskoy Federacii v kontekste sovremennoy pravovoy sistemy (okonchanie) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2018. – № 5. – S. 30–36.
25. Grebnev R. D. Rol' i mesto sudebnyh aktov v pravotvorcheskom processe // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 23–35; https://doi.org/10.12737/jflcl.2020.008.
26. Vasil'eva T. A. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatischeva. – 2009. – № 70. – S. 45–60.
27. Zagaynova S. K. Sudebnyy precedent: problemy pravoprimeneniya. – Moskva: Norma, 2002. – 167 s.
28. Pravovaya politika. Pravo. Pravovaya sistema : monografiya / R. S. Bayniyazov [i dr.] ; pod red. A. V. Mal'ko. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 342 s.
