Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 344.653 Криминальные вопросы
Introduction. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that the article presents different authors' positions on the presence ofthe inquiry in a shortened form as a separate form of preliminary investigationin the criminal process, considers the features of this form of preliminary investigation, its advantages and problematic issues arising in the process of investigation. The comparison is made between the inquiry in a shortened form and foreign police inquiry, as well as the protocol form of inquiry and the inquiry in a shortened form, the author's position on the issue under consideration is presented. Methods. The methodological basis of the research consists of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction) and specific scientific methods of legal research (historical-legal, systemic, sociological, comparative-legal, statistical, formal-logical). Results. The conducted research shows that inquiry in a shortened form copes with its function, and justifies its expediency as a form of preliminary investigation, but needs further improvement. The directions of improvement are related to the possibility of the application of the inquiry in a shortened form to non-obvious crimes, when a person who committed a crime is established within a reasonable period of time, as well as with the restriction of the rights of the victim and the suspect to change their decision in conducting this type of preliminary investigation. The author's definition of the inquiry in a shortened form is submitted.
inquiry, preliminary investigation, a shortened form, abolition, simplified procedure
1. Kirikova M. V., Ozerova Yu. S. Institut doznaniya: za i protiv / Sbornik nauchnyh trudov, posvyaschennyy deyatel'nosti nauchnyh shkol Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii i priurochennyy k 25-letiyu so dnya ego obrazovaniya / sost.: O. I. Gorodovaya, O. S. Kravchenko, A. A. Zhavoronkova. Sankt-Peterburg : Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2023.S. 343–348.
2. Boyarskaya A. V. Problemy yuridicheskoy konstrukcii predmeta dokazyvaniya v ramkah sokraschennogo doznaniya // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2015. № 1. S. 38–42.
3. Panokin A. M. Doznanie v sokraschennoy forme // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 5 (42). S. 914–918.
4. Runovskiy A. V. K voprosu o sozdanii sokraschennogo doznaniya // «Chernye dyry» v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2011. № 6. S. 123–126.
5. Vlasova N. A. Doznanie v forme polnogo rassledovaniya // Innovacii v nauke: puti razvitiya : materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii / gl. red. M. P. Nechaev. Cheboksary : Ekspertno-metodicheskiy centr, 2018. S. 198–202.
6. Gir'ko S. I., Harchenko S. V., Dolgopolov A. A., Kambarov A. M. Rossiyskoe uskorennoe doznanie: sovremennye metamorfozy processual'noy formy // Penitenciarnaya nauka. 2022. T. 16, № 3 (59). S. 274–284. https://doi.org/10.46741/2686-9764.2022.59.3.005.
7. Chepik M. M. Sokraschennoe doznanie kak vid kompromissa v sovremennom ugolovnom processe / Deyatel'nost' pravoohranitel'nyh organov v sovremennyh usloviyah : materialy XIH Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Irkutsk, 29–30 maya 2014 g. Irkutsk : Vostochno-Sibirskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2014. S. 142–144.
8. Zagor'yan S. G., Kotel'nikova O. A. Sokraschennoe doznanie: nekotorye problemy i puti ih resheniya // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2021. № 2 (97). S. 85–94. https://doi.org/10.24412/2312-3184-2021-2-85-94.
9. Sumin A. A. Sokraschennoe doznanie: mertvorozhdennoe ditya reformatorov ugolovnogo processa // Advokat. 2013. № 10. S. 5–8.
10. Zhuravleva N. M. Osobennosti rassmotreniya sudom ugolovnogo dela, rassledovannogo v poryadke gl. 321 UPK RF // Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo processa i kriminalistiki : sbornik nauchnyh statey, g. Mogilev, 30 aprelya 2021 g. Mogilev : Mogilevskiy institut MVD Respubliki Belarus', 2021. S. 62–66.
11. Matinyan E. A. Doznanie v sokraschennoy forme: suschnost' i problemy // Molodoy uchenyy. 2019. № 46 (284). S. 167–169.
12. Hismatullin I. G. Problemnye voprosy sokraschennoy formy doznaniya // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2016. № 3. S. 59–61.
13. Peshkov M. A. Novyy vid predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya – doznanie v sokraschennoy forme // Novyy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 2. S. 164–166.
14. Yakimovich Yu. K. Prokuror i sledovatel': processual'noe polozhenie v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 357. S. 148–150.
15. Harzinova V. M. Aktual'nye problemy proizvodstva doznaniya v sokraschennoy forme // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. № 5 (55): v 2-h ch. Ch. I. C. 199–202.
