from 01.01.2022 until now
Krasnodar, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
UDK 343.01 Теория. Понятие и основы уголовного права. Право наказывать. Исправление правонарушителя
Introduction. The implementation of criminal policy in the field of protection of traditional Russian spiritual and moral values requires improvement of methodological foundations of axiological interpretation of objects of criminal law protection, including the answer to the questions: “Why should this or that object be protected?”, “What exactly is the protected interest or benefit?”, “What is its content of value for society?”. This interpretation is designed to reveal the true component of protected legal benefits on the basis of considering the cultural and civilisational features of Russian society and the state. Methods. The methods of scientific cognition were applied: comparative-legal one, complex analysis, generalisation. Results. The meaning of axiological interpretation of the objects of criminal law protection is to identify, on the basis of traditional Russian spiritual and moral values, the content of human rights and freedoms (themselves being recognised as the highest constitutional value), which would contribute to the development of human potential in society in the interests of harmonious and safe living of all people, while avoiding extremes set by universalism and relativism, individualism and etatism, demonstrating a fair balance of interests of an individual and the state, freedom and security, opportunity and responsibility. If this or that possibility of human behaviour is contrary to traditional values, it cannot be perceived as a component of the content of rights and freedoms, therefore, it cannot claim the status of a legally protected good.
methodology of criminal law, axiology of criminal law, traditional spiritual and moral values, human rights, security, etatism, liberalism
1. Andrinat'eva O. V. Fenomen prava v kontekste aksiologicheskoy metodologii // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2016. T. 6, № 12A. S. 41–51.
2. Yaschenko A. S. Filosofiya prava Vladimira Solov'eva. Teoriya federalizma. Opyt sinteticheskoy teorii prava i gosudarstva / vstup. st., komment. i sost.: A. P. Al'bov. Sankt-Peterburg : Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 1999. 252 s.
3. D'yakov S. V. Gosudarstvennye prestupleniya (protiv osnov konstitucionnogo stroya i bezopasnosti gosudarstva) i gosudarstvennaya prestupnost'. Moskva : Norma,, 1999. 307 s.
4. Hoang V. N. Human Dignity and Fundamental Freedoms - Global Values of Human Rights: A Response to Cultural Relativism. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2008. 54 p; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1314288.
5. Romanov P. V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E. R. Antropologiya prav cheloveka: universalizm i relyativizm / Prava cheloveka i problemy identichnosti v Rossii i v sovremennom mire : materialy Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo simpoziuma, g. Sankt-Peterburg, 8–9 iyulya 2005 g. / pod red. O. Yu. Malinovoy, A. Yu. Sungurova. Sankt-Peterburg : Norma, 2005. S. 31–41.
6. Mingazov L. H. Universalizm prav cheloveka i kul'turnoe mnogoobrazie mira // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2008. T. 150, № 5. S. 61–72.
7. Glushkova S. I. K voprosu o sovremennyh koncepciyah prav cheloveka / Pravo v sovremennom mire : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Ekaterinburg, 7 dekabrya 2012 g. : v 2 ch. Ekaterinburg : Ural'skiy institut – filial RANHiGS pri Prezidente RF, 2012. S. 5–13.
8. Yakushev L. V. Ideya prav cheloveka na peresechenii kul'turnyh tradiciy (spor ob aziatskih cennostyah) // Filosofiya i obschestvo. 2019. № 4. S. 111–122; https://doi.org/10.30884/jfio/2019.04.07.
9. Karpovich O. G., Smagina L. A. Koncepciya tradicionnyh duhovno-nravstvennyh cennostey v mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniyah: rossiyskiy podhod // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2023. № 1. S. 54–65.
10. Pogorleckaya I. I. Aktual'nye problemy sootnosheniya universal'nyh i nacional'nyh pravovyh cennostey v usloviyah sovremennyh obschestv // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2016. № 2. S. 307–319; https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2016.2.27.
11. Zaharova O. V. Oficial'nyy diskurs prav cheloveka v postkommunisticheskoy Rossii: ot liberalizma k paternalizmu // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2016. № 2. S. 82–93.
12. Farhutdinov I. Z., Ermolina M. A. P. I. Smirnov: ob izmenenii cennostnyh osnov mezhdunarodnogo prava: neobhodimost' i vozmozhnost' interv'yu s doktorom filosofskih nauk, professorom Smirnovym Petrom Ivanovichem // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2018. № 8 (123). S. 12–18.
13. Merkushev V. N. Prava cheloveka v mezhdunarodnom prave v kontekste kul'turnyh razlichiy // Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural'skogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2002. № 3. S. 422–439.
14. Osipov A. I. Bogoslovskie aspekty prav cheloveka // Zhurnal Moskovskoy patriarhii. 1984. № 5. S. 56–60.
15. Fominskaya M. D. Dostoinstvo lichnosti i prava cheloveka kak tradicionnye rossiyskie duhovno-nravstvennye cennosti // NOMOTHETIKA: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo. 2022. T 47, № 4. S. 819–829; https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2022-47-4-819-829.
16. Mihaylova E. V., Butrim I. I. Teoretiko-pravovye podhody k opredeleniyu sposobov i processual'nyh form zaschity tradicionnyh cennostey v Rossiyskom gosudarstve // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2023. № 9. S. 44–52; https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520027733-7.
17. Dalgaly T. A., Gost'kova D. Zh. Tradicionnye duhovno-nravstvennye cennosti kak osnova nacional'noy bezopasnosti Rossii // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2023. T. 23, № 3. S. 7–10; https://doi.org/10.14529/law230301.
18. Demidov Yu. A. Social'naya cennost' i ocenka v ugolovnom prave. Moskva : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1975. 182 s.
19. Bochkarev S. A. Aksiologiya ugolovnogo prava: vvedenie v temu i problemy ee stanovleniya // Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovyh issledovaniy. 2015. № 4 (5). S. 73–80.
