from 01.01.2024 until now
Volgograd, Volgograd, Russian Federation
Annotation. Introduction. The article presents the results of a study of the «gender war» phenomenon as a specific form of informational, psychological, and cognitive influence on marital and family relations, traditional spiritual and moral values, and the demographic stability of society. The relevance of the work is determined by the fact that conflicting and negative images of men and women are increasingly reproduced in the modern media space, which contributes to the undermining of trust in family relationships and the weakening of interpersonal solidarity. Methods. The methodological basis of the study consists of systemic, structural-functional, comparative-legal, and value-normative approaches. Elements of media discourse analysis, cultivation theory, stigmatization theory, as well as the author's concept of A.I. Melikhov, within the framework of which national security is considered as a process of self-preservation, self-reproduction, and self-maintenance of a multinational people. Results. It has been revealed that the «gender war» manifests itself through the systematic formation of negative images of men and women in the media, the artificial reinforcement of mistrust of potential marriage partners, and the spread of labels and stigmatizing categories. These processes lead to the atomization of society, a decline in readiness for marriage and parenthood, and the weakening of family ties and demographic potential. The erosion of trust between men and women is not only a socio-cultural problem but also a threat to national security in the sphere of spiritual and moral values and the self-reproduction of the people. It is concluded that the principle of trust and good faith in relationships between men and women, as well as between older and younger generations, must be legally enshrined in the system of protecting traditional Russian spiritual and moral values. It is proposed that this principle be given cross-cutting significance, extending it, in particular, to family and information law, which will strengthen legal mechanisms for countering destructive media content that undermines the institution of the family, intergenerational continuity, and demographic security.
Gender war, informational and psychological influence, cognitive threats, national security, traditional values, demographic security, gender and intergenerational trust, principle of good faith, stigmatization, cultivation theory
1. Pratsko G.S. Konstitutsionno-pravovyye osnovy demograficheskoy bezopasnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Filosofiya prava. 2014. № 1 (62). S. 56-59.
2. Yakunin V.I., Bagdasaryan V.E., Sulakshin S.S. Novyye tekhnologii bor'by s rossiyskoy gosudarstvennost'yu: Monografiya / 3-ye izd. ispravl. i dopoln. M.: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2013. 472 s.
3. Matveychev O. Informatsionnyye voyny XXI veka. «Myagkaya sila» protiv atomnoy bomby. M.: Knizhnyy mir, 2016. 352 s.
4. Kameneva A. It's Your Fault: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Narratives Surrounding Gender-Based Violence in a Russian Talk Show // Language, Culture and Society. 2024. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 190-222.
5. Velikaya N.M. Zhenshchiny v publichnom diskurse Rossii, Kazakhstana i Uzbekistana v kontekste transformatsii politicheskikh rezhimov v XXI veke (sravnitel'nyy analiz) // PolitBook. 2026. № 2. S. 60-82.
6. Mosiyenko L.I. Gendernyy konflikt i transformatsiya reproduktivnoy funktsii sem'i v usloviyakh sovremennogo obshchestva // Omskiye sotsial'no-gumanitarnyye chteniya - 2010: Materialy mezhregional'noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Omsk: Omskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet, 2010. S. 130-134.
7. Suleymanova R.R. , Betil'merzayeva M.M. Mezhpokolencheskiy konflikt tsennostey kak faktor razrusheniya natsional'noy samobytnosti // Aktual'nyye problemy sovremennoy nauki: vzglyad molodykh uchenykh: Materialy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Groznyy: Chechenskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy institut, 2016. S. 289-294.
8. Akimov R.A. Sotsiologicheskiy i filosofskiy aspekty mezhpokolencheskogo konflikta // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Obshchestvennyye nauki. 2023. № 2 (218). S. 4-10.
9. Melikhov A.I. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' v svete organicheskoy teorii gosudarstva // Voprosy bezopasnosti. 2022. № 3. S. 79-92.
10. Gerbner G., Gross L., Morgan M., Signorelli N. Growing up with Television: The Cultivation Perspective // Brayant J., Zillmann D. (Eds.). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Hilsdale, 1994. P. 17-41.
11. Nadezhina N.N. Mezhlichnostnoye doveriye v pare mezhdu muzhchinoy i zhenshchinoy kak sotsiokul'turnaya tsennost' // Vestnik Maykopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2024. № 3. S. 121-130.
12. Pchelintseva A.S. Fenomen stigmatizatsii v psikhologicheskoy literature // Vestnik nauki. 2022. № 10 (55). S. 78-85.
13. Gaunova D.Kh. Stigmatizatsiya kak forma proyavleniya sotsial'nogo markirovaniya // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnyye znaniya. 2014. № 7. S. 284-290.
14. Bogdanova Ye.Ye. Mnogootraslevaya priroda printsipa dobrosovestnosti v rossiyskom prave // Lex Russica. 2023. T. 76. № 10 (203). S. 23-35.
15. Matantsev D.A. O printsipe dobrosovestnosti v semeynom prave // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2018. № 7 (163). S. 16-20.
16. Dzhenakova Ye.V. Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy po rasprostraneniyu informatsii // European and Asian Law Review. 2025. T. 8. № 1. S. 18-29.
