employee
Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDC 159.9
Introduction. The relevance of the research stems from the need to counteract recidivism and to improve the effectiveness of preventive measures against crimes committed by previously convicted individuals. The study aims to overcome the lack of information regarding the role of perceptions of crime and punishment, as well as their moral evaluation, in regulating unlawful behaviour. The findings obtained make it possible to apply a subject-activity approach to the study of the personality of repeat offenders, providing further understanding of the extent of antisocial attitudes and socio-psychological maladjustment in groups of recidivists who commit violent and acquisitive crimes. The aim of the study is to provide a theoretical description of subjective perceptions of crime and punishment as components of a recidivist's personality, and to conduct an empirical assessment of their level in relation to the number of repeat offences. Methods: The theoretical research is carried out by means of the analysis and synthesis of theories and concepts relating to the personality of repeat offenders. Methods of concretisation and conceptualisation are used to generalise findings on the role of perceptions of crime and punishment. The empirical research is based on a questionnaire survey, the results are processed using correlation analysis (Spearman’s), comparative analysis (U-test), multiple regression analysis and covariance analysis in order to identify the role of perceptions of crime and punishment, levels of guilt and shame in samples of repeatedly convicted offenders. The sample comprises 911 convicted individuals, with an average age of 38.2 years; the number of convictions ranges from 2 to 13. Results: Based on an analysis of theories and concepts, theoretical approaches for describing the personality of a repeat offender (differential-typological, socio-psychological and subject-activity-based ones) are given. The study demonstrates that perceptions of crime and punishment can be regarded as regulators of social behaviour, whereas their intensity varies depending on the cycles of criminalisation. The study revealed that the level of antisocial perceptions changes between the second and fourth convictions. By the fifth conviction, 92% of repeat offenders express antisocial perceptions of crime and punishment, thereby completing the formation of the repeat offender's personality. Differences are identified in the experience of guilt and shame depending on the cycle of recidivism: whilst the level of guilt and shame stands at 100% for those with two convictions, it decreases by 18–19% with each cycle among profit-motivated recidivists; by 23-28% among violent offenders, reaching only 35-40% of the initial level by the fifth conviction; by the seventh conviction, the level of guilt and shame practically disappears. The findings can be used in working out methods for assessing the risk of reoffending and in developing models for psychopreventive work based on modifying reoffenders’ subjective perceptions of crime and punishment.
offender profile, repeat offender profile, psychology of recidivism, recidivism, guilt, probation, reintegration
1. Abul'hanova, K. A. (2002). Social'nye predstavleniya i myshlenie lichnosti. V Sovremennaya psihologiya: sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanij (Ch. 3, s. 88–103). Institut psihologii RAN.
2. Antonyan, E. A. (2014). Lichnost' recidivista: kriminologicheskoe i ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe issledovanie [Dissertaciya doktora yuridicheskih nauk, Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj yuridicheskij universitet im. O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA)].
3. Ganishina, I. S., & Rusakov, S. V. (2022). Zhiznennye plany osuzhdennyh, otbyvayushchih nakazaniya v ispravitel'noj kolonii obshchego rezhima. Penitenciarnaya nauka, 16(2), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.46741/2686-9764.2022.58.2.011
4. Gluhov, A. A., & Egereva, O. A. (2019). Rol' harakteristiki lichnosti prestupnika v rassledovanii prestuplenij, sovershennyh ranee sudimymi licami. Molodoj uchenyj, (12), 159–162.
5. Gorkin, V. I. (2007). Recidivnaya prestupnost' i kriminal'naya sreda [Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata yuridicheskih nauk, Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya].
6. Zabelich, A. A. (2013). Lichnost' professional'nogo prestupnika, otbyvayushchego nakazanie v mestah lisheniya svobody, kak ob"ekt kriminologicheskogo issledovaniya [Dissertaciya kandidata yuridicheskih nauk, Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal'noj sluzhby ispolneniya nakazanij].
7. Zlokazov, K. V. (2014). Stili kriminal'nogo myshleniya kak diagnosticheskij konstrukt. Vestnik Ural'skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, (1), 76–80.
8. Zlokazov, K. V. (2021). Social'noe prostranstvo v predstavlenii prestupnika. Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossijskoj Federacii.
9. Zlokazov, K. V., & Pivovarova, T. V. (2024). Disfunkcii otnoshenij k social'nomu okruzheniyu v kontekste narushenij social'noj reintegracii lic, osvobozhdennyh iz mest lisheniya svobody. Viktimologiya, 11(1), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.47475/2411-0590-2024-11-1-162-175
10. Zueva, E. G. (2025). Resursnye funkcii viny, sovesti i styda v processe transformacij sub"ektnosti postpenitenciarnoj lichnosti. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 4 (108), 294–302.
11. Kovalev, A. G. (1968). Psihologicheskie osnovy ispravleniya pravonarushitelya. Yuridicheskaya literatura.
12. Kozlov, A. P., & Sevast'yanov, A. P. (2015). Edinichnye i mnozhestvennye prestupleniya. Yuridicheskij centr-Press.
13. Konopleva, I. N., Knyazeva, S. O., Debol'skij, M. G., & Krasnenkova, S. A. (2022). Osobennosti samoregulyacii u osuzhdennyh, sovershivshih prestupleniya pri recidive. Psihologiya i pravo, 12(2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120203
14. Korotkova, E. V. (2002). Social'no-psihologicheskij analiz viny i styda kak sistemy otnoshenij lichnosti k sebe i drugomu [Dissertaciya kandidata psihologicheskih nauk, Rostovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet].
15. Kunc, E. V. (2025). Nekotorye voprosy kriminologicheskoj harakteristiki prestupnika, sovershivshego recidivnoe prestuplenie. Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie, 2, 12–15. https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4438-2025-2-12-15
16. Kurguzkina, E. B. (2003). Teoriya lichnosti prestupnika i problemy individual'noj profilaktiki prestuplenij [Avtoreferat dissertacii doktora yuridicheskih nauk, Vserossijskij nauchno-issledovatel'skij institut MVD Rossijskoj Federacii].
17. Lebeshev, I. S. (2025). Lichnost' recidivista, otbyvayushchego nakazanie v mestah lisheniya svobody [Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata yuridicheskih nauk, Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj yuridicheskij universitet im. O. E. Kutafina (MGYUA)].
18. Levina, E. A. (2004). Issledovanie harakterologicheskih simptomokompleksov razlichnyh grupp osuzhdennyh [Dissertaciya kandidata psihologicheskih nauk, Samara].
19. Leonov, N. I. (2004). Ontologicheskij podhod v social'noj psihologii. Yaroslavskij psihologicheskij vestnik, 13, 30–32.
20. Makogon, I. K., & Enikolopov, S. N. (2014). Aprobaciya metodiki izmereniya sklonnosti k perezhivaniyu chuvstv viny i styda (GASP). Voprosy psihologii, 4, 118–126.
21. Min'kovskij, G. M. (1971). K voprosu o tipologii nesovershennoletnih pravonarushitelej. V Voprosy sudebnoj psihologii: Tezisy dokladov i soobshchenij na Vsesoyuznoj konferencii po sudebnoj psihologii (s. 31–32).
22. Mihajlov, A. N. (1998). Lichnost' i deyatel'nost' recidivista v usloviyah ispravitel'nogo uchrezhdeniya (psihologicheskij aspekt) [Dissertaciya kandidata psihologicheskih nauk].
23. Moskalev, A. Yu. (2012). Osobennosti lichnosti recidivistov. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel'nyh organah, (2), 84–89.
24. Nekrasov, A. P. (2005). Penitenciarnyj recidiv v ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdeniyah: teoriya issledovaniya i mery protivodejstviya [Dissertaciya doktora yuridicheskih nauk, Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossijskoj Federacii].
25. Novikova, Yu. V. (2021). Tipologicheskie skhemy lichnosti prestupnika v strukture kriminologicheskoj harakteristiki prestupnosti (prestuplenij). Obshchestvo i pravo, 2 (76), 32–37.
26. Pastushenya, A. N. (2010). Urovni psihicheskoj regulyacii social'nogo povedeniya individa i ih uchet v psihologicheskom analize prestupleniya. Vestnik Akademii MVD Respubliki Belarus', 2 (20), 152–156.
27. Pastushenya, A. N. (2015). Psihologicheskaya diagnostika stepeni ispravleniya osuzhdennyh: osnovy teorii i metodiki. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, 4, 10–20.
28. Pahomova, D. A. (2023a). K voprosu o psihologicheskih osobennostyah lichnosti osuzhdennyh recidivistov. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, 4 (65), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.33463/2072-8336.2023.4(65).116-126
29. Pahomova, D. A. (2023b). Teoreticheskij analiz problemy recidivnoj prestupnosti v sovremennoj yuridicheskoj psihologii. Psihologiya i pedagogika sluzhebnoj deyatel'nosti, 4, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.24412/2658-638X-2023-4-44-48
30. Pominov, A. V. (2026). Psihologicheskie aspekty soderzhaniya viny v ugolovnom prave. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 1 (109), 307–318.
31. Razumova, E. M. (2007). Psihologicheskie osobennosti lichnosti prestupnikov-recidivistov [Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata psihologicheskih nauk, Sankt-Peterburgskij gosudarstvennyj universitet].
32. Ratinov, A. R. (1981). K yadru lichnosti prestupnika. V Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii (s. 59–63).
33. Saharov, A. B. (1961). O lichnosti prestupnika i prichinah prestupnosti v SSSR. Gosyurizdat.
34. Sechko, A. V. (2020). Psihologicheskie faktory recidivizma i ego profilaktiki (po materialam zarubezhnyh issledovanij). Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya, 9(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090109
35. Suslov, Yu. E., Fyodorov, A. F., & Bespalova, A. V. (2024). Sovremennye problemy povtornoj prestupnosti. Social'no-psihologicheskij aspekt. Psihologiya i pravo, 14(4), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140405
36. Filippova, O. V. (2022). Kriminologicheskaya harakteristika lichnosti recidivista v Rossii: osnovnye tendencii izmeneniya parametrov v sovremennyj period. Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal, 16(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2022.16(2).207-216
37. Filippova, O. V. (2025). Recidivnaya prestupnost' v Rossii: tendencii i zakonomernosti. Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal, 19(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2025.19(2).137-147
38. Cvetkova, N. A. (2024). Lichnostnye harakteristiki vnov' osuzhdennyh k lisheniyu svobody muzhchin, svyazannye s vremennym intervalom mezhdu dvumya sudimostyami. Psihologiya i pravo, 14(3), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140308
39. Sharanov, Yu. A., & Zueva, E. G. (2024). Psihologo-yuridicheskaya dinamika struktury i funkcij viny v processe resheniya postpenitenciarnoj problemy rossijskogo obshchestva. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel'nyh organah, 29(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.24412/1999-6241-2024-196-6-11
40. Shcherbakov, G. V. (2023). Evolyuciya idei ispravleniya osuzhdennyh. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, 3 (64), 15–25.
41. Eminov, V. E., & Antonyan, Yu. M. (2015). Lichnost' prestupnika i ee formirovanie. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava, 1 (50), 37.
42. Yakovlev, A. M. (1971). Prestupnost' i social'naya psihologiya (s. 35–37). Yuridicheskaya literatura.
43. Allen, C. H., Gullapalli, A. R., Milillo, M., Ulrich, D. M., Rodriguez, S. N., Maurer, J. M., Aharoni, E., Anderson, N. E., Harenski, C. L., Vincent, G. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (2024). Psychopathy scores predict recidivism in high-risk youth: A five-year follow-up study. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 52(7), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01169-x
44. DeLisi, M., Drury, A. J., & Elbert, M. J. (2022). The p factor, crime, and criminal justice: A criminological study of Caspi et al.'s general psychopathology general theory. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 81, Article 101773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101773
45. Jasni, M. A., Hassan, N., Ibrahim, F., Kamaluddin, M. R., & Sulaiman, S. (2024). Exploring the factors of recidivism from the perspectives of homeless former prisoners, government agency officers, and volunteers. Journal of Population and Social Studies, 33, 175–197. https://doi.org/10.25133/jpssv332025.01
46. Moretti, G., Flutti, E., Colanino, M., Ferlito, D., Amoresano, L., & Travaini, G. (2024). Recidivism risk in male adult sex offenders with psychopathic traits assessed by PCL-R: A systematic review. Medicine, Science and the Law, 64(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024231187186
47. Opriș, L., Hurezan, L., & Visu-Petra, L. (2025). Reading the mind in the dark: Theory of mind and dark personality as predictors of criminal behavior and recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 99, Article 102451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102451
48. Silver, J. R., & Silver, E. (2021). The nature and role of morality in offending: A moral foundations approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 343–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820960201
49. Simourd, D. J., & Olver, M. E. (2002). The future of criminal attitudes research and practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802029004005
50. Van Vugt, E., Gibbs, J., Stams, G. J., Bijleveld, C., Hendriks, J., & van der Laan, P. (2011). Moral development and recidivism: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(8), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11396441
51. Walters, G. D. (2025). The effect of direct interventions for antisocial cognition on recidivism in antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-025-09675-8
52. Walters, G. D., Kremser, J., & Runell, L. (2023). Mediating the worst of both worlds effect with facets of criminal thought process: Moral neutralization, cognitive impulsivity, and their interaction. Deviant Behavior, 44(10), 1427–1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2207710
53. Werth, K. A., & Coolidge, F. L. (2025). Psychological and neuropsychological assessment of recidivism in 1,490 adult prison inmates. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 36(6), 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2025.2581574
