employee
Minsk, Belarus
employee
Minsk, Belarus
VAK Russia 5.3.9
UDC 101.8
UDC 316.3
Introduction. The relevance of a socio-anthropological approach to the study of online conflicts stems from the contradictory nature of the development of information and communication technologies. It is particularly important to clarify the specific ways in which information influences the value systems and ethical norms of online users, as well as their perception and understanding of the world. Exploring the multifaceted nature of the phenomenon of “online conflict” through the prism of deviant behavior focuses on identifying the specific manifestations of aggression, the deliberate distortion of information and the undermining of social foundations in the online space. Symbolic capital acts as a significant resource that initiates socio-cultural transformations and the emergence of a new form of electronically mediated discourse; it creates favourable conditions for the management of social processes, which is a prerequisite for understanding the specific nature of modern warfare. The research aims to conduct a conceptual and theoretical investigation of the socio-anthropological nature of online conflicts as a manifestation of deviant behavior. In this context, the intensification of conflicts serves as a means of reflecting the sentiments of various social groups, whilst the destructive use of information weapons is geared towards shaping a value-laden and meaningful representation of existing social problems. Consequently, symbolic constructs acquire military and economic power, transforming the sphere of human activity and complicating the geopolitical trajectory of the unfolding of contradictions. Research methods. The methodology of network and synergetic approaches offers considerable heuristic potential for studying this phenomenon, as it enables the analysis of unstable, multidimensional and contradictory processes characteristic of today’s turbulent social reality and helps to identify the specific nature of network interactions between individuals, which is determined by the structural organisation of the network. Results. The main findings of the research demonstrate that networks expand the possibilities for the dissemination of unverified information, transforming the channels through which information is transmitted and the mechanisms by which it is internalised by the individual. By encroaching on all spheres of human life and erasing spatial and temporal boundaries, the uncontrolled consumption of false information leads to the escalation of conflicts. In this regard, identifying the essential characteristics of online conflicts forms the basis for seeking and adopting effective solutions aimed at safeguarding the security of the development and existence of society and the state.
online conflict, deviant behavior, consciousness, manipulation, information
1. Berestovoj, A. N. (2025). Ugolovno-pravovoe protivodejstvie obshchestvenno opasnym proyavleniyam subkul'tury v seti «Internet». Rossijskij deviantologicheskij zhurnal, 5 (1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2025-1-147-166
2. Bodrijyar, Zh. (2000). V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konec social'nogo (N. V. Suslov, per.; K. V. Zhvakin, red.). Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta.
3. Giddens, E. (2005). Sociologiya (A. V. Berkov i dr., per.; 2-e izd., vypoln. po 4-mu angl. izd., polnost'yu pererab. i dop.). Editorial URSS.
4. Dairbekova, Zh. M., & Poluyan, A. Yu. (2024). Destruktivnoe i manipulyativnoe vliyanie social'nyh setej. Sistemnaya inzheneriya i informacionnye tekhnologii, 6(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.54708/2658-5014-SIIT-2024-no1-p59
5. Kasyuk, A. Ya. (2021). Informacionno-psihologicheskoe vozdejstvie v informacionnom protivoborstve. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye nauki, 1, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.52070/2500-347X_2021_1_842_22
6. Korovin, V. M. (2014). Tret'ya mirovaya setevaya vojna. Piter.
7. Krasovskaya, N. R., & Gulyaev, A. A. (2021). K voprosu o kontrole fejkov, dipfejkov, fejkovyh akkauntov v internete. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sociologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 5(1), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2021-5-1-96-99
8. Krasovskaya, N. R., Gulyaev, A. A., & Yulina, G. N. (2019). Fejkovye novosti kak fenomen sovremennosti. Vlast', 27(4), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i4.6589
9. Kuz'menko, Yu. A., & Popova, O. V. (2020). Fejkovaya propaganda kak instrument dezinformacii obshchestva i bor'ba za ih rasprostranenie. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 10, 122–125. https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1337_2020_10_122
10. Lebedeva, M. M. (2017). "Ideal'nyy shtorm" kak rezul'tat "gibridizatsii" mirovoy politiki. In Gibridizatsiya mirovoy i vneshney politiki v svete sotsiologii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (pp. 97–111). Goryachaya liniya-Telekom.
11. Lektorskij, V. A. (2022). Global'naya cifrovizaciya kak antropologicheskij vyzov. V Chelovek i sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta (str. 18–29). Yuridicheskij centr.
12. Makarenko, S. I. (2016). Informacionnoe oruzhie v tekhnicheskoj sfere: terminologiya, klassifikaciya, primery. Sistemy upravleniya, svyazi i bezopasnosti, 3, 292–376. https://doi.org/10.24411/2410-9916-2016-10311
13. Manojlo, A. V. (2017). Gibridizaciya mirovoj politiki. V Gibridizaciya mirovoj i vneshnej politiki v svete sociologii mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij (str. 44–96). Goryachaya liniya - Telekom Moskva.
14. Medovkina, L. Yu. (2020). Osobennosti evrazijskoj modeli setevoj vojny. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya. Religiovedenie, 32, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2020.32.7
15. Parizer, E. (2012). Za stenoj fil'trov. Chto Internet skryvaet ot vas? (A. Shirikov, per.). Al'pina Biznes Buks.
16. Plyushch, A. N. (2017). Social'no-psihologicheskie mekhanizmy informacionnogo vliyaniya. Aspekt-Poligraf.
17. Shyuc, A. (2008). Nekotorye struktury zhiznennogo mira. Voprosy social'noj teorii, 2, 72–87.
18. Shyuc, A. (2003). O mnozhestvennosti real'nostej. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 3(2), 3–34.
19. Eginli, A. T., & Tas, N. O. (2018). Interpersonal Communication in Social Networking Sites: An Investigation in the Framework of Uses and Gratification Theory. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8 (2), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.12973/ojcmt/2355
20. Lessig, L. (1999). Code: And other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books.
21. Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 11–25). SAGE.
22. Sontag, L. M., Clemans, K. H., Graber, J. A., & Lyndon, S. T. (2011). Traditional and cyber aggressors and victims: A comparison of psychosocial characteristics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(4), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9575-9
23. Suler, J. (2000). Psychotherapy in cyberspace: A 5-dimensional model of online and computer-mediated psychotherapy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493100315996
