Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.07 Теория государства и права
The article is devoted to the analysis of the terminological apparatus associated with the phenomenon of quasi-judicial justice. The goal is to consider the legal interpretation of the concepts of “quasi-judicial justice” as a set of bodies and institutions providing alternative judicial means of resolving conflicts in society. The research methodology consisted of formal legal and analytical methods. The paper uses methods of linguistic analysis. The study determines the formal and essential (material) approaches to the definition of quasijudicialness. There is a diversity of phenomena that form quasi-judicial institutions in the historical and modern sense and the lack of certainty of word usage in the legal field: normative acts and the doctrine of law. The conclusions are based on the departure from tradition, the negative coloring of the phenomenon of quasi-judicial justice, which is based on the practice of applying the decisions of administrative justice bodies as a tool for building an authoritarian political model of the USSR.
administrative justice, alternative ways to resolve conflicts, quasi-judicial justice, quasijudicial social institution, judicial authorities, arbitration proceedings
1. Ageeva G. N. Tovarischeskie sudy i ih vzaimodeystvie s gosudarstvennymi organami. - Moskva: Sov. Min. RSFSR, 1967. - 88 s.
2. Bashlakov-Nikolaev I. V. Antimonopol'nye organy kak kvazisudebnye organy administrativnoy yusticii // Zakony Rossii: opyt. analiz. praktika. - 2013. - № 12. - S. 89-95.
3. Bezgin V. B. Pravovye obychai i pravosudie russkih krest'yan vtoroy poloviny XIX - nachala XX veka. - Tambov: Izd-vo Tamb. gos. tehn. un-ta, 2012. - 124 s.
4. Ivanova N. Yu. Deyatel'nost' organov administrativnoy yusticii na mestah v Rossiyskoy imperii v nachale XX veka // Istoriko-pravovye problemy: novyy rakurs. - 2014. - № 9-1. - S. 82-87.
5. Liverovskiy A. A. Organy konstitucionnoy yusticii kak «kvazisudy» // Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudiya. - 2010. - № 3. - S. 23-27.
6. Luparev E. B. Istoriya razvitiya administrativnoy yusticii v Rossii v dosovetskiy period i sovremennye perspektivy formirovaniya administrativnyh sudov // Zhurnal administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva. - 2016. - № 2. - S. 5-8.
7. Orlova I. A. «Kvazisudebnye» i sudebnye organy v ramkah mezhdunarodnyh organizaciy // Mezhdunarodnoe i nacional'noe pravosudie: Teoriya, istoriya, praktika : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. 20 maya 2010 g. / pod obsch. red. S. K. Dryahlova. - Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'skiy dom «Petropolis», 2010. - S. 227-233.
8. Panova I. V. Razvitie administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva i administrativnoy yusticii v Rossii // Pravo. - 2016. - № 4. - S. 54-69.
9. Starilov Yu. N. Administrativnaya yusticiya: teoriya, istoriya, perspektivy. - Moskva: Norma, 2001. - 304 s.
10. Teplyakov A. G. Deyatel'nost' organov VChK-GPU-OGPU-NKVD (1917-1941 gg.): istoriograficheskie i istochnikovedcheskie aspekty / 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. - Moskva: Politicheskaya enciklopediya, 2018. - 439 s.
