employee from 01.01.2017 to 01.01.2019
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.79 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
The article goes through the issues of legal support for the admissibility of evidence obtained within the territory of a foreign state. This issue is particularly topical in connection with rise in international crime. The need to improve the crime fighting requires updating of standards of work with evidence, specifically in evaluation of evidence obtained in a foreign state. Failure to comply with the relevant procedure and rules in request for legal assistance may cause further difficulties in providing of legal assistance and in the recognition of evidence as acceptable in the territory of the Russian Federation. The article proposes criteria how the proving subjects can accept evidence obtained within the territory of a foreign state as admissible. Ensuring the admissibility of evidence is premised on compliance with international treaties as well as observance of established procedures for the interaction between Russian and foreign law enforcement agencies and compliance with the law of a foreign state regarding the procedure for obtaining and enshrining evidence. The article explains why the legislation requirements of the place where the evidence was obtained, but not the country requesting the evidence, are of primary importance for establishing the admissibility of evidence obtained outside the Russian Federation. The admissibility of evidence is also ensured by compliance with the rules of the legal entity for obtaining evidence, the legal source of evidence, legal methods of obtaining and enshrining evidence.
obtaining of evidence, admissibility of evidence, international legislation, crime investigation
1. Biryukov P. N. K voprosu o pravovom statuse dokazatel'stv po ugolovnym delam, poluchennyh iz istochnikov v inostrannom gosudarstve // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. - 1999. - № 2. - S. 230-237.
2. Bykova E. V. Voprosy ugolovnogo presledovaniya v mezhdunarodno-pravovom sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. - 2006. - № 3. - S. 18-19.
3. Dudchenko V. L., Kolchevskiy I. B., Nagaev E. A., Spanov B. I. Dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie materialov, poluchennyh ot pravoohranitel'nyh organov inostrannyh gosudarstv pri proizvodstve predvaritel'nogo sledstviya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2003. - № 12. - S. 17-20.
4. Kipnis N. M. Dopustimost' dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. - Moskva: Yurist, 1995. - 128 s.
5. Milinchuk V. V. Vzaimnaya pravovaya pomosch' po ugolovnym delam: Deystvuyuschaya praktika i perspektivy razvitiya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2001. - 352 s.
6. Orlov Yu. K., Lyaskovec A. V. Problema kriteriya dopustimosti dokazatel'stv, poluchennyh na territorii inostrannogo gosudarstva v processe osuschestvleniya mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoriya i pravo». - 2013. - № 3. - S. 65-69.
7. Rudich V. V. Mezhdunarodnye standarty dopustimosti dokazatel'stv, poluchennyh pod pytkami i inym putem beschelovechnogo obrascheniya s zaderzhannymi (arestovannymi) po ugolovnomu delu // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». - 2015. - T. 15. - № 4. - S. 53-57.
8. Shiplyuk V. A. Pravovaya pomosch' v sfere mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva po ugolovnym delam. - Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy yuridicheskiy institut (filial) Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2012. - 128 s.
9. Sokolov A. F. Processual'nyy poryadok priznaniya v sude dokazatel'stv, ne imeyuschih yuridicheskoy sily // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. - 1994. - № 10. - S. 14-15.
10. Volevodz A. G., Solov'ev A. B. Mezhdunarodnyy rozysk, arest, konfiskaciya i peredacha inostrannym gosudarstvam denezhnyh sredstv i imuschestva, poluchennyh prestupnym putem, a takzhe veschestvennyh dokazatel'stv po ugolovnym delam. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2007. - 437 s.
