employee
g. Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Relevance. Maladaptive personality behavior is one of the research subjects of deviant behavior, and from the point of view of the social-normative criterion contradicts the tasks of harmonious adaptation of a person. This makes it difficult to perform professional functions, causes industrial conflicts, disorganization of all kinds of activity and crises being an urgent problem of a psychological, social and personal nature. The study of individual psychological mechanisms and criteria for disadaptation makes it possible to determine the psychological mechanisms of its formation and to prevent the negative consequences of maladjustment using a multilevel integral analysis of its different variations. Objectives. The aim of the article is to establish the actual characteristics of individual psychological maladjustment and to determine the mechanisms of its formation as a condition for prevention. Research progress. The research specifies the current risks of personality maladjustment associated with the factors of the virtual space, isolation of the individual from the conditions of real interaction, the duration of the pandemic. The analysis of the factors determining individual psychological maladjustment, the stability of the genesis of which is noted in the overwhelming majority of studies is carried out. The study clarifies the concept of the psychological mechanism of the formation of deviant behavior in general and maladjustment in various specific spheres of human activity. Conclusions. The formation of individual psychological maladjustment of the personality is subject to the action of multilevel universal mechanisms, which are practically not discussed in current empirical works. Further studies will be needed to examine private and general mechanisms of behavior deviating from the norm as well as its consequence, that is the formation of maladaptive individual psychological characteristics. The system of multilevel integral connections being activated in accordance with the principles of consistency, stability and differentiation, acts as a mechanism of individual psychological maladjustment. To carry out the tasks of preventing individual psychological maladjustment, it is necessary to study the methodology of analyzing causal and teleological relations.
deviant behavior, maladjustment, maladjustment prevention, psychological maladjustment mechanisms, individual psychological maladjustment, multilevel analysis, integral individuality
1. DeAngelo, G., Ferrell, P., McCannon, B. C. (2017). Sources of deviant behavior: Contrasting alternative explanations in the laboratory. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 19(71), 31-44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.07.003.
2. Freud, Z. (1962). The neuro-psychoses of defence. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Die Abwehr-Neuropsychosen (1894) (Voll. III). London: Hogarth press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
3. Gangestad, S. W., Yeo, R. A. (1997). Behavioral genetic variation, adaptation and maladaptation: an evolutionary perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(3), 103-108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(97)89056-0
4. Meyer, T., Albrecht, J., Bornschein, G., Sachsse, U., Herrmann-Lingen C. (2016). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Patients Exhibit a Blunted Parasympathetic Response to an Emotional Stressor. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 41, 395-404. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9341-1
5. Muhammad, L., Sarwar, A. (2021). When and why dehumanizing an organization leads to deviant behavior at work in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 99. 103044. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijhm.2021.103044
6. Olivera-La Rosa, A., Chuquichambi, E. G., Carmona-Cardona, C. A., Arango-Tobón, O. E., Amador, O., Rosselló, J., & Ingram, G. P. D. (2021). The “Joker” laugh: Social judgments towards affective deviants in a sample of young offenders with callous unemotional traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 183, 111148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2021.111148
7. Plé. L., Demangeot, C. (2019). Social contagion of online and offline deviant behaviors and its value outcomes: The case of tourism ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 117, 886-896. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.002
8. Sica, C., Latzman, R. D., Caudek, C., Cerea, S., Colpizzi, I., Caruso, M., Giulini, P., & Bottesi, G. (2021). Facing distress in Coronavirus era: The role of maladaptive personality traits and coping strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 177, 110833. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110833
9. Trinidad, J. E. (2021). Childhood adversity and deviant peers: Considering behavioral selection and cultural socialization pathways. Children and Youth Services, 121, 105844. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105844
10. Twenge, J. M., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Social exclusion causes self-defeating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83(3), 606−615. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.606
11. XuXin, F., Hsu, L. C. (2020). Anger or fear? Effects of discrete emotions on employee’s computer-related deviant behavior. Information & Management, 57(3), 103180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103180
12. Belicheva, S. A. (1995). Social’no-pedagogicheskie metody ocenki social’nogo razvitiya dezadaptirovannyh podrostkov. Vestnik psihosocial’noj i korrekciono-reabilitacionnoj raboty, 1, 3-17.
13. Burdyukova, E. V., Pustovalov, D. A., Oranskaya, A. N., Percov, S. S., Gurevich, K. G. (2012). Mekhanizmy dezadaptacii uchashchihsya moskovskih obshcheobrazovatel’nyh shkol k fizicheskoj nagruzke. Byulleten’ eksperimental’noj bi¬ologii i mediciny, 153(4), 414-416.
14. Vojskunskij, A. E. (2004). Aktual’nye problemy zavisimosti ot Interneta. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 1, 90-100.
15. Vygotskij, L. S. (1983). Problemy razvitiya psihiki. V A.M. Matyushkin (red.), Sobranie sochinenij: v 6-ti t. (T. 3.). Moskow: Pedagogika.
16. Dubinskij, A. A., Kovaleva, M. E., Ionov, A. I. (2008). Individual’no-tipologicheskie i individual’no-psihologicheskie faktory social’noj dezadaptacii u lic s doklinicheskim i klinicheskim urovnem psihicheskih rasstrojstv. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki, 11, 253-256.
17. Zmanovskaya, E. V. (2013). Strukturno-dinamicheskaya koncepciya deviantnogo povedeniya. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 5(133), 189-195.
18. Klejberg, YU. A. (2015). Deviantnoe povedenie: cintagma, ontologiya, epistemologiya. Obshchestvo i pravo, 1(51), 262-269.
19. Kovaleva, M. E. (2018). Individual’no-psihologicheskie i psihofiziologicheskie prediktory psihicheskoj dezadaptacii u lic molodogo vozrasta. Mir nauki, 5(6).
20. Kovaleva, M. E. (2019). Osobennosti nervno-psihicheskoj dezadaptacii u specialistov razlichnogo profilya professional’noj deyatel’nosti. Psihologiya i pravo, 3, 219-231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090316
21. Krasnova-Gol’eva, V. V., Holmogorova, A. B. (2011). Social’naya trevozhnost’ i studencheskaya dezadaptaciya. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 3(1), 140-150.
22. Leont’ev, V. G. (2002). Motivaciya i psihologicheskie mekhanizmy ee formirovaniya. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskij poligrafkombinat.
23. Mendelevich, V. D. (2013). Osobennosti deviantnogo povedeniya v internet-prostranstve. Prakticheskaya medicina, 1(66), 143-146.
24. Merlin, V. S. (1986). Ocherk integral’nogo issledovaniya individual’nosti. Moskow: Pedagogika.
25. Mihajlov, I. A. (2013). Psihologicheskij mekhanizm kak metodologicheskij paradoks. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal, 6, 42-46.
26. Mihajlov S. G., Polovinkin V. A., Dvorzhickaya M. A. (2017). Psihicheskaya dezadaptaciya kak faktor, prepyatstvuyushchij razvitiyu professional’nogo potenciala sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del. Gumanitarnye, social’no-ekonomich¬eskie i obshchestvennye nauki, 2, 24-28.
27. Molodcova, T. D., Kobysheva, L. I., SHalova, S. YU. (2017). Psihologicheskie mekhanizmy social’noj dezadaptacii podrostkov-pravonarushitelej. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah, 4(71), 55-59.
28. Moskova, M. V. (2007). Lichnostnye faktory emocional’noj dezadaptacii studentov. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 12(5), 82-91.
29. Nemov, R. S. (2007). Psihologicheskij slovar’. Moskow: Gumanitar. izd. centr VLADOS.
30. Orlova, T. G. (2014). Narushenie mekhanizmov social’no-psihologicheskoj adaptacii kak marker sklonnosti k deviantnomu povedeniyu studencheskoj molodyozhi. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal, 6, 207-210.
31. Rubinshtejn, S. L. (2000). Osnovy obshchej psihologii. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
32. Rybnikov, V. YU., Dubinskij, A. A., Bulygina, V. G. (2017). Individual’no-psihologicheskie prediktory adaptacii. Ekologiya cheloveka, 3, 3-9.
33. Shpak, L. L. (2011). Social’naya dezadaptaciya: priznaki, mekhanizmy, urovni. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 3, 50-55.
