from 01.01.1999 to 01.01.2022
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
from 01.01.2007 to 01.01.2022
Saint-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
The article examines the methodological and substantive problems of understanding the educational norm, reveals the essence and ambiguity of the consequences of the educational activity subjects’ deviant behavior. The relevance of the topic of the theoretical research is determined by the fact that in the modern scientific literature devoted to the study of deviant behavior, the considered subject field as a rule does not extend to the field of pedagogical activity, its norms and rules, while this type of activity is a critically significant aspect of society that has a clearly defined specifics and ambiguity of its social and personal consequences. The object of research is the phenomenon of deviant behavior, the subject at hand are the forms of its manifestation in the field of educational activity. The purpose of the article is to conceptualize the essence of educational deviation. In order to achieve this goal, the authors address the following theoretical challenges: clarification of the meaning of the concept of «norm», determining its specifics in the field of educational activity, studying the ambiguous consequences of educational deviations. The conducted research is based on the use of dialectical methodological tools that allow to understand the subject in its integrity and unity of opposite sides and development trends. The article justifies the understanding of the educational norm as a synthesis of organizational regulations of this type of activity and considers the possibilities of constructive deviations from this norm aimed at achieving socially or individually significant pedagogical results. The theoretical significance of this approach avoids simplification and one-sidedness in understanding the ratio of norm and deviation in the field of pedagogy, while practical significance lays in the possibility of its methodological use in the process of creating organizational norms of the educational activities.
deviantology, norm, deviation, educational norm, measure, regulation, standard, education
1. Aryamov, A. A., Gracheva, Yu. V., Chuchaev, A. I., Malikov, S. V., Ivanov, S. A. (2020). Deviacii v cifrovom mire: ugolovno-pravovoe izmerenie (ch. II, str. 2-120). Moskva: OOO «Yuridicheskaya firma «Kontrakt».
2. Asil'derova, M. M., Makkasharipova, A. (2021). Osobennosti formirovaniya lichnosti, demonstriruyuschey deviacii v povedenii. V M.M. Asil'derova (red.) Pedagogika i psihologiya v sovremennom mire: problemy i innovacii: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii (30 oktyabrya 2020 g., str. 144-147). Moskva, Berlin: Direkt-Media.
3. Afanasenkova, E. L., Vasyagina, N. N., Vlasova, L. E., Gerasimenko, Yu. A., Eromasova, A. A. i dr. (2018). Profilaktika deviantnogo povedeniya obuchayuschihsya v usloviyah obrazovatel'noy organizacii: kollektivnaya mono-grafiya. Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet.
4. Gilinskiy, Ya. I. (2009). Globalizaciya, deviantnost', social'nyy kontrol': sbornik statey. Sankt-Peterburg: DEAN.
5. Gilinskiy, Ya. I. (2021). Deviantologiya: sociologiya prestupnosti, narkotizma, prostitucii, samoubiystv i drugih «otkloneniy». Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteya.
6. Kolesnikova, G. I. (2017). Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «norma», «deviaciya», «garmoniya», «tvorchestvo» i ih znachenie v ovremennom obrazovatel'nom processe. Gumanizaciya obrazovaniya, (3), 4-9.
7. Komlev, Yu. Yu. (2015). Deviantnost' i social'nyy kontrol': teoriya, issledovaniya, praktika. Izbrannye stat'i. Kazan': Kazanskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii.
8. Korol'kov, A. A. (1979). Dialektika i teoriya mediciny: monografiya. LGU.
9. Pugolovkina, K. Yu. (2021). Sovremennyy vzglyad na problemu podrostkovyh deviaciy. Intellektual'nye resursy - regional'nomu razvitiyu, 2, 221-224.
10. Snimschikova, E. V. (2010). Nekotorye aspekty polozhitel'nyh i otricatel'nyh proyavleniy deviaciy kak faktora progressivnogo razvitiya sociuma. Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya, 2, 78-86.
11. Toffler, A. (1997). Futuroshok. Sankt-Peterburg: Lan'.
12. Uil'yams, R. (1960). Biohimicheskaya individual'nost'. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoy literatury.
13. Shumilin, O. V., Kuzin, N. N. (2019). Ispol'zovanie terminov ponyatiynogo apparata ekonomiki v razlichnyh otraslyah prava. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 4 (84), 83-91.
14. Balakhonskaya, L. V., Strelchenko, V. I., Balakhonsky, V. V., Sadretdinova, T. A., Beresneva, I. V. (2020). Communicative Strategy of Discrediting Opponents in the Russian Political Blogosphere. In 2020 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS 2020, pp. 27-33). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ComSDS49898.2020.9101281
15. Balakhonsky, V. V., Shipunova, O. D., Strelchenko, V. I., Balakhonskaya, L. V., Beresneva, I. V. (2020). Motivation factors for political consciousness formation in the modern world. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9. 941-949.
16. Corkin, D., Wiesner, M., Reyna, R. S., Shukla, K. (2015). The Role of Deviant Lifestyles on Violent Victimization in Multiple Contexts. Deviant Behavior, 36(5), 405-428.
17. DeAngelo, G., Ferrell, P., McCannon, B. C. (2017). Sources of deviant behavior: Contrasting alternative explanations in the laboratory. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 19 (71), 31-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.07.003
18. Goode, E. (2011). Deviant behavior. Upper Saddle River (9th Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
