The ascription of state bodies to law-enforcement agencies in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In contrast to the documents of the USSR, in which the term «law enforcement agencies» was used rather fragmentarily, in the legislation of the Russian Federation this term is used quite widely. At the same time, there is no definition of the term “law enforcement agencies” in the legislation of the Russian Federation, and in the context of the provisions of certain regulatory legal acts, this term is given a different meaning. The list of law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation is also not legally fixed. The current situation has a negative impact on the uniform application of certain provisions of the legislation and leads to an unreasonably wide discussion on this issue. In the article, based on the analysis of the norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation on public service, the authors argue that the positions of the federal public service of other types (positions of the federal public service related to law enforcement) are currently introduced in nine federal state bodies and, accordingly, the actual presence in The Russian Federation has just such a large number of law enforcement agencies. In order to resolve the situation described in the article, the authors conclude that it is necessary to adopt a single legislative act regulating the procedure for passing the law enforcement service, in which, among other norms, it should be expressly fixed that the list of law enforcement agencies is approved by the President of the Russian Federation.

Keywords:
law enforcement agencies, law enforcement activities, state bodies, functions of state bodies, the public service system of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, police, service in the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation, employees, special ranks
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Amirbekov K. I. Pravoohranitel'naya deyatel'nost' i pravoohranitel'nyy organ: ponyatie i kriterii razgranicheniya // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. - 2017. - № 4. - S. 48-51.

2. Beketov O. I., Oparin V. N., Surgutskov V. I. Sfera vnutrennih del i sovremennaya sistema pravoohranitel'nyh organov Rossii // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2018. - № 1. - S. 137-142.

3. Gazetdinov N. I. Znachenie ponyatiya «Pravoohranitel'nye organy» dlya obrazovatel'nogo processa i yuridicheskoy praktiki // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. - 2014. - № 4. - S. 64-67.

4. Drozdov D. E. O ponyatii i vidah dolzhnostnyh lic pravoohranitel'nyh organov // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2018. - № 3 (120). - S. 129-133.

5. Evstafiadi Ya. K. O neobhodimosti zakonodatel'nogo zakrepleniya sistemy pravoohranitel'nyh organov Rossii // Administrativnoe i municipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - № 6 (90). - S. 603-608.

6. Zyryanov S. M. Administrativnyy nadzor policii i policeyskiy nadzor: sootnoshenie pravovyh kategoriy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2012. - № 2 (182). - S. 46-54.

7. Ol'shevskiy A. V., Zayaev E. D. Zakonodatel'nye predposylki dlya vozvrascheniya na sovremennom etape k voprosu o pravoohranitel'noy sluzhbe // Administrativnoe pravo i process. - 2019. - № 10. - S. 59-62.

8. Ol'shevskiy A. V. O normativnyh pravovyh aktah, posluzhivshih v 2011-2012 godah osnovoy dlya reformirovaniya organov vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Vserossiyskogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikacii sotrudnikov Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii. - 2022. - № 1 (61). - S. 110-118.

9. Pozdnov M. S. Problemy opredeleniya sistemy pravoohranitel'nyh organov Rossiyskoy Federacii na sovremennom etape (Podgotovlen dlya sistemy Konsul'tantPlyus, 2022) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus» (data obrascheniya: 20.05.2022).

10. Sopneva E. V. O sisteme pravoohranitel'nyh organov // Tamozhennoe delo. - 2007. - № 3. - S. 6-10.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?