Criminalization and decriminalization as instruments of social control over persons who committed a crime
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Annotation: The relevanceof the research topic is determined by the complexities of modern trends in criminalization (decriminalization) within the framework of the emerging criminal law policy. Generalization of the approaches formed in the doctrine (and the positions of the authors) to the ongoing changes in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, expressed in the increase in the number of criminal law prohibitions and law enforcement practice, demonstrates the qualitative changes in the emerging prohibitions in relation to the designs of the relevant offences, sanctions, as well as the actually developing law enforcement practice in this area. The object ofthe study is social relations linking criminalization processes with the stage of the implementation of criminal punishment and other measures of criminal law nature and further individualized crime prevention. The aim of the study was to define the mechanism of criminalization (decriminalization) not only within the framework of criminal law prohibitions, but of further law enforcement practice as well. As a result of the study, the author states that there is a correlation between the trend towards the increase in the number of criminal law prohibitions with the simultaneous introduction of instruments to reduce the punitive potential of sanctions contained in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the practical reduction in the use of repressive measures. The partial use of measures of social control over the behavior of convicts as an instrument of private prevention is noted and the need to expand such means and their specification based on the characteristics of the crime committed and the personality traits of the criminal is pointed out. The findings can be used in the legislative process, as well as law enforcement practice when assigning and executing punishment and other criminal law measures.

Keywords:
criminalization, public danger, mitigation of punishment, measures of social control, criminal record
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Rarog A. I. Repressivnyy kren rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. - 2014. - № 3. - S. 88-95.

2. Kashepov V. P., Golovanova N. A., Gravina A. A. Kriminalizaciya i dekriminalizaciya kak formy preobrazovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva. - Moskva: Yuridicheskaya firma «Kontrakt», 2018. - 280 s.

3. Bavsun M. V. Vliyanie faktorov geopoliticheskogo haraktera na izmenenie ugolovno-pravovoy politiki gosudarstva // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. - 2015. - № 3. - S. 483-493.

4. Lopashenko N. A. O zaschite ekonomicheskih svobod ugolovnym zakonom i ot ugolovnogo zakona / Problemy effektivnosti osuschestvleniya pravoohranitel'noy funkcii v obespechenii social'no-ekonomicheskoy stabil'nosti v obschestve : sbornik materialov konferencii. - Minsk: BGU, 2018. - S. 87-88.

5. Gilinskiy Ya. I. Ugolovnaya politika obschestva postmoderna / Ugolovnaya politika i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika : sbornik materialov IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Sankt-Peterburg: Centr nauchno-informacionnyh tehnologiy Asterion, 2022. - S. 10-18.

6. Kozachenko I. Ya. Skrytaya dekriminalizaciya: problemy i puti ih resheniya / Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeystvie i ego rol' v preduprezhdenii prestupnosti (I Saratovskie ugolovno-pravovye chteniya) : sbornik statey po materialam konferencii. - Saratov: Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya. 2016. - S. 78-81.

7. Sadykov D. I., Ahmet'yanova N. A. Rasprostranenie feykovyh novostey vo vremya pandemii COVID-19 // Colloquium-journal. - 2020. - № 8. - C. 78-79.

8. Habrieva T. Ya. «Yurisprudenciya pandemii»: teoriya chrezvychaynogo // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2022. - T. 18. - № 1. - S. 5-9.

9. Genrih N. V. Kriminalizaciya i mezhdunarodnye pravootnosheniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 2022. - № 11. - S. 114-122.

10. Zvecharovskiy I. E. O celyah ugolovnogo nakazaniya i ih dostizhenii // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2022. - № 6. - S. 48-52.

11. Luneev V. V. Social'nye posledstviya, zhertvy i cena prestupnosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 2009. - № 1. - S. 36-56.

12. Babaev M. M., Kvashis V. E. Cena prestupnosti: problemy teorii i praktiki // Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzglyad. - 2009. - № 2. - S. 246-259.

13. Elinskiy A. V. Obschepravovye posledstviya ugolovnogo osuzhdeniya: konstitucionno dopustimye predely // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2011. - № 6. - S. 106-113.

14. Gabdrahmanov F. V. Ugolovno-pravovye i obschepravovye posledstviya sudimosti: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz // Evraziyskaya advokatura. - 2014. - № 4 (11). - S. 47-50.

15. Zhizhek Slavoy. Protiv prav cheloveka (Against Human Rights) // New Left Review. - 2005. - № 34, July-August. - R. 115-131.

16. Babaev M. M., Pudovochkin Yu. E. Repressivnoe reshenie social'nyh problem: prichiny i posledstviya // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. - 2016. - № 3. - S. 419- 430.

17. Golovko L. V. Zakonoproekt ob ugolovnom prostupke: mnimye smysly i real'naya podopleka // Zakon. - 2018. - № 1. - S. 128-136.

18. Kozyrev G. I. Social'noe deystvie, vzaimodeystvie, povedenie i social'nyy kontrol' // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. - 2005. - № 8. - S. 124-129.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?