graduate student
Samara, Samara, Russian Federation
UDK 347 Гражданское право. Судопроизводство
Introduction: the article considers various approaches to the classification of private definitions, analyses the criteria for their division in the course of development of procedural legislation. This issue requires actualisation in procedural science in order to fully understand the essence and purpose of private definitions, as well as to improve their effectiveness. The aim of the article is to propose criteria for the division of private definitions that meet the current legislation and modern judicial practice. Methods: The author used the methods of comparative analysis, synthesis, generalisation of scientific materials and other general and special methods of scientific cognition. Results: based on the provisions of article 226 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the RF and article 188.1 of the APC of the RF, judicial practice and the results of scientific research, six criteria of classification of private determinations are proposed: by the subject who decides them; by the subject to whom the private determination is issued; by the plurality of subjects; by the initiating subject; by the grounds for issuing; by the nature of the committed offence. The expediency of expanding the subject composition of the institute of private rulings by including subjects of private law, such as individual entrepreneurs, legal entities and citizens is substantiated, which is conditioned by the development of judicial practice in this direction.
private determination, violation of legality, abuse of procedural rights, judicial control, subjects of professional activity, judicial act
1. Kashepov V. Organizaciya profilakticheskoy raboty v narodnom sude // Sovetskaya yusticiya. - 1972. - № 23. - C. 28-29.
2. Mironov L. K. Chastnoe opredelenie suda - deystvennoe oruzhie v bor'be za predotvraschenie prestupleniy // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1972. - № 5. - S. 117-120.
3. Zaycev I. M. Kassacionnye opredeleniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom processual'nom prave / pod redakciey N. B. Zeydera. - Saratov: Privolzhskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1967. - 80 s.
4. Chuykov Yu. N. Chastnoe opredelenie v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. - Moskva: Mosizdat, 1974. - 120 s.
5. Baturina N. A. Chastnye opredeleniya sudov vyshestoyaschih instanciy v adres nizhestoyaschih sudov // Pravovaya paradigma. - 2019. - T. 18. - № 2. - S. 122-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2019.2.20.
6. Minasyan G. M. Chastnye opredeleniya v grazhdanskom processe // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2018. - № 2 (117). - S. 170-172.
7. Baturina N. A. Chastnoe opredelenie kak processual'noe sredstvo preduprezhdeniya sudebnyh oshibok v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. - 2012. - № 7. - S. 39-42.
8. Miroshnichenko M. N., Gladysheva E. V. Chastnoe opredelenie v arbitrazhnom processe // Zakonnost'. - 2021. - № 2. - S. 13-17.
9. Kremneva E. V., Mamatov M. V., Miroshnichenko V. S. Institut chastnogo opredeleniya: aktual'nye voprosy primeneniya v prokurorskoy praktike // Zakonnost'. - 2019. - № 6. - S. 22-27.
10. Kuz'mina A. A. Hodataystvo prokurora o vynesenii sudami chastnyh opredeleniy v poryadke st. 226 GPK RF // Otechestvennaya yurisprudenciya. - 2019. - № 6 (38). - S. 48-51.
11. Mozhilyan S. A. Institut chastnogo opredeleniya v arbitrazhnom processe // Arbitrazhnye spory. - 2022. - № 1 (97). - S. 5.
12. Kulik T. Yu. Processual'nye problemy opredeleniya statusa organizaciy, nadelennyh otdel'nymi gosudarstvennymi ili inymi publichnymi polnomochiyami // Severo-Kavkazskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. - 2015. - № 4. - S. 94-101.
13. Kazancev P. O neobhodimosti vozvrascheniya instituta chastnogo opredeleniya v APK RF // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process. - 2009. - № 6. - S. 17-20.
14. Yaroshenko O. N. Chastnoe opredelenie suda kak sposob profilaktiki i preduprezhdeniya narusheniy prav grazhdan pri rassmotrenii grazhdanskih del // Mirovoy sud'ya. - 2011. - № 3. - S. 12-14.
15. Uzdimaeva N. I., Igonin A. E. Klassifikaciya pravonarusheniy po rossiyskomu zakonodatel'stvu: sovremennye podhody // Kontentus. - 2019. - № 9 (86). - S. 23-33.
