Krasnodar, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
UDK 343.98 Криминалистика. Криминалистическая техника и тактика
Abstract: Introduction. The article describes the issues of the concept, content of exculpatory circumstances in the investigation of crimes. Justifying circumstances are important in the system of establishing the event of a crime and proving the guilt of a particular person. Verification of the named circumstances is obligatory, no matter by whom they are stated. The forensic issues of verification of exculpatory circumstances have been given sufficient attention in science. However, at present it is necessary to carry out a detailed study of not only the circumstances specified in Chapter 8 of the Criminal Code of the RF, but also a number of other exculpatory data. Methods and results. In the process of research the authors used statistical and formal-legal methods. The analysis of exculpatory circumstances was conducted from the perspective of the structure of investigation and resistance to investigation, the mandatory verification of exculpatory circumstances, which is an important element of proving both the event of the crime and the guilt of a particular person. The article considers the types of exculpatory circumstances. The methods of verification of alibi, impossibility of committing a crime by a particular person due to illness, lack of physical data necessary for the commission of a crime. The methods of verification of the specified exculpatory circumstances are considered. The importance of verification of information on exculpatory circumstances for completeness and objectivity of investigation is shown.
investigation, exculpatory circumstances, subject matter of investigation, opposition, types of exculpatory circumstances, organisation of investigation
1. Bayev O. Ya. Predvoskhishchayushchaya proverka alibi i drugikh vozmozhnykh versiy so storony zashchity / Kachestvo rassledovaniya: kriminalisticheskiye i ugolovno-protsessual’nyye problemy : materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. - Krasnodar, 2016. - S. 47-48.
2. Belokobyl’skaya O. I. Alibi i yego proverka pri rassledovanii prestupleniy // Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. - 2015. - № 2-3. (setevoye izdaniye) [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rae.ru : sayt. - URL : https://science-education.ru/ru/issue/view?id=131 (data obrashcheniya 05.07.2023).
3. Yelfimov P. V., Vinogradova O. P. Lozhnoye alibi kak element mekhanizma protivodeystviya rassledovaniyu prestupleniy // Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki. - 2022. - № 3. - S. 10-19.
4. Zelenskiy V. D. Organizatsiya proverki alibi / Otechestvennaya kriminalistika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra: sbornik nauchno-prakticheskikh statey. Pod obshchey redaktsiyey I. M. Komarova. - Moskva : Izdatel’stvo «Yurlitinform», 2020. - S. 146-150.
5. Zelenskiy V. D. Organizatsiya rassledovaniya prestupleniy : monografiya. - Rostov-na-Donu, 1989. - S. 12.
6. Zelenskiy V. D. Teoreticheskiye voprosy organizatsii rassledovaniya prestupleniy : monografiya. - Krasnodar : KubGAU, 2011. - S. 76.
7. Zuykov G. G. Obshchiye voprosy ispol’zovaniya spetsial’nykh poznaniy v protsesse predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya // Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza. - 1966. - Vyp. I. - S. 113-114.
8. Kuyemzhiyeva S. A. Metodika rassledovaniya prestupleniy protiv sem’i i nesovershennoletnikh : monografiya. - Moskva: Izdatel’stvo «Yurlitinform», 2018. - S. 176-177.
9. Levchenko O. V. Problemy dokazyvaniya alibi obvinyayemogo po ugolovnym delam // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2015. - № 4 (359). - S. 123-128.
10. Rossinskaya Ye. R. Spetsial’nyye poznaniya i sovremennyye problemy ikh ispol’zovaniya v sudoproizvodstve // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2001. - № 5. - S. 32-43.
11. Smirnova I. G. Znacheniye alibi po delam o prestupleniyakh v sfere komp’yuternoy informatsii: v razvitiye idey V. I. Shikanova / Sibirskiye ugolovno-protsessual’nyye i kriminalisticheskiye chteniya. - 2015. - № 2 (8). - S. 81-87.
12. Stankevich A. M., Dmitrenko A. P., Fomenko Ye. V. Sootnosheniye usloviy i predelov pravomernosti krayney neobkhodimosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2011. - № 1. - S. 141-145.
13. Shapiro L. G. Protsessual’nyye i kriminalisticheskiye aspekty ispol’zovaniya spetsial’nykh znaniy pri rassledovanii prestupleniy v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel’nosti. - Moskva: Izdatel’stvo «Yurlitinform», 2007. - S. 9-44.
14. Eysman A. A. Zaklyucheniye eksperta. Struktura i nauchnoye obosnovaniye. - Moskva: Yurid. lit., 1967. - S. 89-91. - 152 s.
15. Glushkova Ye. M. Ponyatiya «kraynyaya neobkhodimost’» i «prevysheniye predelov krayney neobkhodimosti» // Gumanitarnyye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye i obshchestvennyye nauki. - 2016. - № 3. - S. 100-103.
