employee from 01.01.1999 to 01.01.2023
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 351.745.7 Уголовный розыск. Криминальная полиция
Introduction. At all times, secrecy has been associated exclusively with secrecy and criminal (political) investigation as the forefather of operational investigative activities. At the end of the XX – beginning of the XXI centuries, there appeared hypotheses about the attitude of secrecy not only to conspiracy and operational investigative activities, but also to other branches of law and areas of social life. The scientific and legal community discussed the problem more and more often within their community. The relevance of this study is due to the conflict of modern scientific views of the legal community on the sociolegal phenomenon of secrecy and the polemic of its attribution only and exclusively to the field of operational investigative activities. Having analyzed modern law enforcement practice and current legislation in various spheres of life, the author puts forward and substantiates the thesis about the interdisciplinary nature of the institute of secrecy. Methods. Methodology: the study used general scientific dialectical, comparative legal, formal logical methods and the method of content analysis. The study made it possible to identify facts and evidence of the existence and functioning of the institution of secrecy in social spheres unrelated to the ORDO and law enforcement in general. Results. Based on the results of his own research and the results of numerous previous scientific studies of other lawyers, the author comes to the conclusion that the socio-legal phenomenon of secrecy is objectively characteristic of many spheres of society’s activities in addition to its purely operational-investigative and law enforcement activity, which proves its interdisciplinary nature.
secrecy, confidentiality, conspiracy, operational investigative activity, criminal process
1. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti». S postateynym prilozheniem normativnyh pravovyh aktov / avt.-sost. d-r yurid. nauk, prof. A. Yu. Shumilov. - 4-e izd., ispr. i dop. - Moskva: Izdatel' Shumilova I. I., 2002. - 290 s.
2. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti» / avt.-sost. d-r yurid. nauk V. S. Ovchinskiy. - Moskva: Norma: INFRA-M, 2022. - 488 s.
3. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti» / pod red. prof. A. E. Chechetina. - Barnaul: Barnaul'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2022. - 303 s.
4. Pavlichenko N. V. Predposylki formirovaniya chastnoy teorii neglasnosti raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy // Pravovaya paradigma. - 2017. - T. 16. - № 2. - S. 109-116.
5. Lugovik V. F. Operativno-razysknoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii: avtorskiy proekt. - Omsk: Omskaya yuridicheskaya akademiya, 2014. - 94 s.
6. Bobrov V. G. Nekotorye suzhdeniya v zaschitu pozicii K. V. Surkova i drugih storonnikov sochetaniya glasnosti i neglasnosti operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Operativnik (syschik). - 2008. - № 3 (16). - S. 12-17.
7. Ponkin I. V., Red'kina A. I. Klassifikaciya kak metod nauchnogo issledovaniya, v chastnosti v yuridicheskoy nauke // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2017. - № 37. - S. 249-259.
8. Kol'cov D. V. Glasnost' i neglasnost' kak kriterii klassifikacii operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy / Aktual'nye problemy nauki i praktiki: Gatchinskie chteniya - 2019. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov po materialam VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Gatchina: Gosudarstvennyy institut ekonomiki, finansov, prava i tehnologiy, 2019. - S. 336-338.
9. Shienok V. P. K voprosu o soderzhanii realizacii principa soblyudeniya konspiracii v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del / Puti sovershenstvovaniya operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyah pravovoy reformy : sbornik nauchnyh trudov. - Minsk: Akademiya milicii MVD Respubliki Belarus', 1993. - S. 22-23.
10. Pavlichenko N. V., Tambovcev A. I. Sochetanie glasnyh i neglasnyh metodov i sredstv v ugolovnom processe: innovaciya ili pravovaya real'nost'? // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. - 2017. - № 3 (43). - S. 111-115.
11. Tambovcev A. I., Pavlichenko N. V. Princip konspiracii v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: konceptual'nost' vs deklarativnost' // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. - 2019. - № 2 (50). - S. 58-63.
12. Lopatin V. N. Pravovaya ohrana i zaschita sluzhebnoy tayny // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 2000. - № 6. - S. 85-91.
13. Chechetin A. E. Obespechenie prav lichnosti pri provedenii operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy : monografiya. - Sankt-Peterburg: SPbU MVD Rossii, 2016. - 232 s.
14. Atamanov G. A. O zakonodatel'stve Rossiyskoy Federacii v oblasti zaschity razlichnogo vida tayn i neobhodimosti ego korrektirovki // Pravo i bezopasnost'. - 2011. - № 3-4. - S. 127-135.
15. Kaminskiy A. M., Kamalova G. G. Konfidencial'nost' v chastnoy detektivnoy deyatel'nosti: pravovye i takticheskie voprosy obespecheniya informacionnoy bezopasnosti chastnogo syska // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2018. - № 4 (44). - S. 167-172.
16. Zemlyanov V. M. Osnovy sysknogo remesla / pod. obsch. red. A. E. Tarasa. - Minsk: Harvest, 2004. - 304 s.
17. Tambovcev A. I., Pavlichenko N. V. Termin «sodeystvie»: funkcional'no-pravovoy analiz skvoz' prizmu operativno-rozysknoy i chastnoy detektivnoy deyatel'nosti // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. - 2022. - № 2 (62). - S. 90-95.
