Forensic database in the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Introduction. The article discusses the legal framework and other organizational aspects of the application of criminal records in the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States, in particular the emphasis on fingerprint and genomedatabase is made. The use of such records has a positive impact on solution and investigation of any crime, as it allows the rapid identification of a perpetrator, as well as the establishment of his involvement or,on the contrary,noninvolvement in the crime under investigation. Methods. In the course of the study the following methods were used, namely: philosophical (dialectic-materialistic); general scientific (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, abstraction); disciplinary (static); private scientific (dogmatic-legal, comparative law). Results. The study concluded that, in many states, forensic databaseis given a high priority in the fight against crime, resulting in the appropriate legal framework formation, which, in part, needs to be improved to reflect current realities. At the same time, not all of the states under consideration see auniform approach to the creation offingerprint and DNAdatabank, which appears to be determined by different levels of technological infrastructure. Such features should be taken into account when implementing international cooperation in law enforcement among the CIS member states.

Keywords:
forensic database, criminal records, CIS, fingerprintrecord, genomerecord
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Belyakov A. A., Usmanov R. A. Kriminalisticheskaya registraciya. – Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 2006. – 189 s.

2. Belov O. A. Povyshenie effektivnosti i perspektivy razvitiya informacionnogo obespecheniya raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. – 2007. – № 2 (5). – S. 425–341.

3. Vozgrin I. A. Nekotorye voprosy teorii i praktiki kriminalisticheskogo ucheta // Voprosy teorii i praktiki bor'by s prestupnost'yu. – Leningrad: Vysshee politicheskoe uchilische MVD SSSR, 1972. – 110 s.

4. Volynskiy A. F. Vseobschaya daktiloskopicheskaya registraciya grazhdan: za i protiv, mify i real'nost' // Kriminalist' pervopechatnyy. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 116–124.

5. Golovko L. V. Gosudarstvo i ego ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo : monografiya. – Moskva: Izdatel'skiy dom «Gorodec», 2022. – 458 s.

6. Gorshkova V. S. Ekspertno-kriminalisticheskie uchety organov vnutrennih del kak element sistemy kriminalisticheskih uchetov // Altayskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. – 2021. – № 4 (36). – S. 108–112.

7. Ermolovich V. F., Packevich A. P. Istoriya vozniknoveniya i perspektivy razvitiya daktiloskopicheskoy registracii // Problemy upravleniya (Minsk). – 2013. – № 2 (47). – S. 119–134.

8. Kokushev A. B. Standartizaciya uchetno-registracionnoy deyatel'nosti operativno-kriminalisticheskih podrazdeleniy MVD Respubliki Kazahstan kak instrument povysheniya effektivnosti informacionnogo obespecheniya // Nauchnyy vestnik Orlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii im. V. V. Luk'yanova. – 2023. – № 1 (94). – S. 229–236.

9. Luzgin I. I. Metody poznaniya v tehniko-kriminalisticheskom obespechenii kak tehnologiya resheniya kriminalisticheskih zadach // Vestnik Polockogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 161–165.

10. Pusurov A. O., Ismailov A. E., Usmanov T. Kriminalisticheskiy uchet oruzhiya v Kyrgyzskoy Respublike // Izvestiya vuzov (Kyrgyzstan). – 2015. –№ 12. – S. 17–19.

11. Romanyuk D. A., Rubis A. S. Genomnaya registraciya v Respublike Belarus' i perspektivy ee razvitiya pri rassledovanii neraskrytyh prestupleniy proshlyh let // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. – 2014. – № 5 (16). – S. 261–268.

12. Samiev N. M. Aktual'nye voprosy primeneniya kriminalisticheskih sredstv i metodov v rassledovanii neraskrytyh prestupleniy proshlyh let v Respublike Tadzhikistan / Aktual'nye problemy kriminalistiki i sudebnoy ekspertizy : sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii (Irkutsk, 15–16 marta 2019 goda). – Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskiy institut Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2019. – S. 302–308.

13. Umarov M. A., Gafurov M. H. Voprosy informacionnogo obespecheniya pravoohranitel'nyh organov Respubliki Tadzhikistan // Trudy Akademii MVD Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2009. – № 12. – S. 100–111.

14. Yugay L. Yu. Zakonodatel'naya reglamentaciya daktiloskopicheskoy registracii v Respublike Uzbekistan / Deyatel'nost' pravoohranitel'nyh organov na sovremennom etape: nauka, obrazovanie, praktika : sbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara (Minsk, 15 fevralya 2019 goda). – Minsk: Akademiya upravleniya pri Prezidente Respubliki Belarus', 2019. – S. 220–224.

15. Yugay L. Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy ispol'zovaniya avtomatizirovannyh daktiloskopicheskih identifikacionnyh sistem (na primere Uzbekistana) // Voprosy kriminologii, kriminalistiki i sudebnoy ekspertizy. – 2019. – № 1 (45). – S. 106–110.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?