employee from 01.01.2007 to 01.01.2022
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
UDK 343 Уголовное право. Уголовное судопроизводство. Криминология. Криминалистика
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
BBK 67408 Уголовное право
TBK 7581 Уголовное право
BISAC LAW026000 Criminal Law / General
Introduction. The foundation of the state’s strategic activity in the fight against crime (criminal policy) is a set of initial data of a criminological and social nature, the objectivity (compliance with the truth) of which is often rightly questioned, and therefore the issues of searching and selecting sources for the formation of criminal policy in order to achieving the requirement of criminological validity. Methods. In work based on the dialectical-materialistic method of scientific knowledge, the legal-dogmatic method, formal-logical and systemic methods are used. Results. Despite the fact that the scale of criminologically significant information is quite large, an obstacle to the formation of a criminologically based criminal policy is the lack of the required volume of objective data on crime. Recognizing that certain indicators themselves must be correctly interpreted (including in their interrelation and interdependence), it can be argued that correct criminological forecasting requires an appropriate methodological basis that clearly indicates how it is necessary to process what is significant for the fight against crime information. Recognizing the problem of crime latency, it is worth emphasizing the need to find tools for objectifying crime data. In particular, it is worth paying attention to the promise of an integrated approach to the analysis of criminal phenomena, including, at a minimum, “cross-reconciliation” of data from various government bodies and non-state structures (subject to confidence in the objectivity of the information they provide). When making changes to the criminal law, the use of official statistics as a basic source of information is recognized as justified. Of particular importance is the issue of searching for alternative sources of information, which are now increasingly referred to as social expectations.
criminal policy, formation of criminal policy, criminal law policy, criminological validity, official statistics, crime latency, media
1. Lopashenko N. A. Ugolovnaya politika. – Moskva: Volters Kluver, 2009. – 579 s.
2. Endol'ceva A. V., Endol'ceva Yu. V., Platonova N. I. Bazovye nachala ugolovnoy politiki: ot teoreticheskih rassuzhdeniy k de lege ferenda // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2019. – T. 13. – № 4. – S. 641–650; doi:https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(4).641-650.
3. Babaev M. M., Pudovochkin Yu. E. Koncentraciya repressii kak princip ugolovnoy politiki // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2010. – № 4. – S. 109–115.
4. Boyko A. I. Dialektika stabil'nosti i izmenchivosti ugolovnogo zakona // Voprosy pravovoy teorii i praktiki : sbornik nauchnyh trudov / otv. red. V. V. Veklenko. – Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, – 2017. – Vyp. 12. – S. 24–31.
5. Pobegaylo E. F. Tendencii sovremennoy prestupnosti i krizis rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 47–66.
6. Lesnikov G. Yu. Problemy sootnosheniya ugolovnoy politiki i ugolovnogo prava // Nauchnye vedomosti. – 2008. – № 8. – S. 73–76.
7. Luneev V. V. Sootnoshenie kriminal'nyh realiy s teoriey prava v Rossii // Prolog : zhurnal o prave. – 2014. – T. 2. – № 4. – S. 45–52.
8. Luneev V. V. O kriminologo-analiticheskom i sistemnom podhode k zakonotvorchestvu // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 14–25.
9. Baranov A. A., Denisov N. L. Latentnost' prestupleniy i vliyanie na nee ugolovnoy politiki // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2015. – № 4. – S. 35–37.
10. Repeckaya A. L. Ubiystva v Rossii: metodika opredeleniya latentnogo massiva // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. – 2019. – № 32. – S. 55–68; doi:https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/32/5.
11. Luneev V. V. Latentnoy kriminal'nosti neobhodim sistemnyy monitoring // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 41–49.
12. Ivanov P. I., Shegabudinov R. Sh. Ekonomicheskaya i korrupcionnaya prestupnost' i ee latentnost' kak ob'ekt kriminologicheskogo izucheniya // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. – 2017. – № 3. – S. 111–120.
13. Babaev M. M. Neopredelennost' i problemy pravoprimeneniya // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. – 2017. – T. 25. – № 1. – S. 12–19.
14. Babaev M. M., Pudovochkin Yu. E. Izmeneniya rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakona i ih ugolovno-politicheskaya ocenka // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2012. – № 8. – S. 35–45.
15. Pudovochkin Yu. E. Zakonomernosti formirovaniya i razvitiya rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki v usloviyah globalizacii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2017. – № 3. – S. 82–91.
16. Lesnikov G. Yu. Polinormativnost' ugolovnoy politiki // Uchenye trudy Rossiyskoy akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2009. – № 2. – S. 72–78.
17. Gayday M. K., Grozin S. Yu. Rol' SMI v ocenke deyatel'nosti policii // Yurist'-Pravoved'. – 2020. – № 3. – S. 195–198.
18. Rechkov M. P. K voprosu o pravovyh ogranicheniyah svobody rossiyskih sredstv massovoy informacii // Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki. – 2015. – № 2. – S. 127–138; doi: 10/17150/2308-6203.2015.4(2).127-138.
