Russian Federation
UDK 343.13 Уголовно-процессуальное право
Introduction. The problem of storage of seized property during pre-trial criminal proceedings not only persists, but is becoming more acute due to the increasing use of this type of criminal procedural coercive measure provided for by Article 115 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The new Rules on accounting and storage of objects and documents seized in the course of investigation but not recognised as material evidence in criminal cases until recognised as material evidence in criminal cases, adopted by the Government of the Russian Federation on 28 September 2023, do not solve this problem. Several options for solving this problem proposed by scholars are analysed. Methods. In order to solve this problem, we used dialectical, formal-logical methods, as well as the method of interpreting the legal norms of criminal procedure. Results. The article proposes and substantiates the authors’ approach to solving the problem. The essence of the proposal is that the responsible storage and operation of confiscated real estate objects should be carried out by enterprises on a contractual basis. The authors insist on the need for the Main Department of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia to conclude contracts with enterprises for the responsible storage and operation of seized real estate objects. These companies should be responsible for the storage and operation of real estate objects seized by court order until the verdict or other final decision on the criminal case is rendered.
criminal procedure, pre-trial proceedings, seizure of property, immovable property, storage of seized real estate, contractual basis
1. Aleksandrov A. S., Aleksandrova I. A. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti putem protivodeystviya prestupnosti v sfere ekonomiki : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2017. – 607 s.
2. Bagautdinov F. N. Nalozhenie aresta na imuschestvo i cennye bumagi po UPK RF // Yurist. – 2003. – № 1. – S. 41–47.
3. Bulatov B. B., Dezhnev A. S. Mesto nalozheniya aresta na imuschestvo v sisteme ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: istoriya i sovremennost' // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2016. – № 2 (61). – S. 18–24.
4. Ionov V. A., Ivanov A. S. Problemy nalozheniya aresta na nedvizhimoe imuschestvo pri proizvodstve predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya (ugolovno-processual'nyy, operativno-rozysknye aspekty) // Advokatskaya praktika. –2007. – № 6. – S. 27–29.
5. Ionov V. A. Nalozhenie aresta na nedvizhimoe imuschestvo v sootvetstvii so st. 115 UPK RF kak sredstvo obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti // Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' Rossii: politicheskie orientiry, zakonodatel'nye prioritety, praktika obespecheniya : Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2008. – № 2 (9). – S. 67–72.
6. Nalimov D. F. Nalozhenie aresta na imuschestvo pri proizvodstve sledstvennyh deystviy: problemnye voprosy // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. – 2008. – № 2. – S. 134–136.
7. Fedotov I. S. Osobennosti prinyatiya processual'nogo resheniya o nalozhenii aresta na imuschestvo na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2018. – № 2. – S. 129–133.
8. Himicheva O. V. Nalozhenie aresta na imuschestvo: balans chastnyh i publichnyh interesov // Akademicheskaya mysl'. – 2019. –№ 4 (9). – S. 62–65.
9. Kirillova N. P., Nazarov A. D. Zaschita imuschestvennyh prav uchastnikov processa i primenenie mer ugolovno-processual'nogo prinuzhdeniya // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. – 2024. – № 1 (54). – S. 109–113.
10. Kirillov A. A. Ponyatie i priznaki nalozheniya aresta na imuschestvo, prinadlezhaschee yuridicheskomu licu, dlya vozmozhnoy ego konfiskacii // Mezhdunarodnyy pravovoy kur'er : setevoe izdanie. – 2024. – № 1. – S. 20–23. – URL: https://inter-legal.ru/ponyatie-ipriznaki-nalozheniya-aresta-na-imushhestvo-prinadlezhashhee-yuridicheskomu-litsu-dlyavozmozhnoj-ego-konfiskatsii.
11. Rahmanova V. A. Mery, napravlennye na preduprezhdenie sokrytiya imuschestva dolzhnikov. Nazrevshie voprosy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva v dannoy oblasti // Vestnik ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva. – 2024. – № 2. – S. 50–69.
12. Krasil'nikov A. V. Nalozhenie aresta na imuschestvo: nekotorye aspekty razvitiya teorii, sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya i praktiki primeneniya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2024. – № 3. – S. 42–48.
13. Ludanina A. V. Problemy hraneniya arestovannogo imuschestva: zloupotrebleniya i ogranicheniya prav sobstvennika // Ugolovnyy process. – 2024. – № 5 (233). – S. 60–64.
14. Ivanov A. N., Lapin E. S. Nalozhenie aresta na imuschestvo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : [monografiya]. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2007. – 176 s.
15. Aleksandrov A. S., Aleksandrova I. A. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika protivodeystviya korrupcii : monografiya. – Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya, 2018. – 192 s.
16. Aleksandrov A. S., Aleksandrova I. A. Novaya ugolovnaya politika v sfere protivodeystviya ekonomicheskoy i nalogovoy prestupnosti: est' voprosy // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. – 2013. – № 1 (6). – S. 5–19.
17. Tutynin I. B. Ispolnenie sudebnogo resheniya o nalozhenii aresta na imuschestvo sleduet polnost'yu vozlozhit' na sudebnyh pristavov // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. – 2009. – № 13. – S. 7–9.
18. Zemskova E. N. Nalozhenie aresta na imuschestvo obvinyaemyh (podozrevaemyh) kak osnovnaya forma obespecheniya vozmescheniya uscherba po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyah v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. – 2016. – № 2 (38). – S. 112–115.
19. Zhalbuu G. Osobennosti hraneniya imuschestva, na kotoroe nalozhen arest, po ugolovno-processual'nym kodeksam Rossiyskoy Federacii i Mongolii // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. – 2016. – № 2 (31). – S. 46–50; https://doi.org/10.19073/2306-1340-2016-2-46-50.
