Russian Federation
Introduction: There are many risks in the environmental sphere. Questions about the relationship between the concepts of “environmental risk” and “criminal risk”, the peculiarities of the manifestation of these risks in the environmental sphere and the possibilities of managing them require separate study. The author sets the following objectives in the study: consider the concept of “risk”; analyze the most common risk classifications and justify the one most relevant to this study; study the concepts of “criminal risk” and “environmental risk”, identify their relationship; consider the features of criminal and environmental risk management. Methods: The study used general and specific methods: system-structural, formal-logical, comparative legal. Results: The study of the characteristics of criminal and environmental risks should be based on a unified conceptual framework. There are two main approaches to understanding risk – realistic and sociocultural. A realistic approach that allows risks to be normalized seems to be the most promising for practice-oriented research. The sociocultural approach is valuable from the point of view of forming systemic ideas about the concept of risk, which makes it possible to study the nature of this phenomenon and the social processes associated with it. Criminal and environmental risks should be identified in accordance with the classification, which is based on the area of manifestation of the risk. Criminal and environmental risks should be understood as the probability of events that may result in harm of varying scale and severity to legally protected interests and values, criminological and environmental safety.
risk, criminal risk, environmental risk, risk assessment; risk management; criminological security; environmental safety
1. Yanitsky, O. N. Sociology of risk / O. N. Yanitsky; Ross. acad. Sci. Institute of Sociology. – Moscow: LVS Publishing House, 2003. – 191 p.
2. Shopenko, A. D. Conceptual foundations of social riskology of a transitive society / A. D. Shopenko // News of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after. A.I. Herzen. – 2010. – No. 120. – P. 307-314.
3. Sklyarenko, I. A. Fundamentals of risk management: Monograph / I. A. Sklyarenko, Z. I. Dakhova. – Belgorod: Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, 2015. – 102 p.
4. Babaev, M. M. The phenomenon of risk in the context of preventive policy (criminal riskology) / M. M. Babaev, Yu. E. Pudovochkin // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Right. – 2019. – T. 10, No. 1. – P. 136-148. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.110.
5. Yanitsky, O. N. Sociology of risk: key ideas / O. N. Yanitsky // World of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. – 2003. – T. 12, No. 1. – P. 3-35.
6. Starchenko, I.V. Risk analysis and assessment of the effectiveness of changes in personnel management of an organization using the example of individual entrepreneurs / I.V. Starchenko // Economics and business: theory and practice. – 2018. – No. 12–2. – pp. 94–98. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24411/2411-0450-2018-10267.
7. Dukhanina, E. V. Analysis of approaches to the interpretation of the concept of risk, its content and management methods / E. V. Dukhanina, K. Yu. Kulakov, A. T. Khametova // Bulletin of Eurasian Science. – 2022. – T. 14, No. 1.
8. Beck U. Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity. L.: SAGE, 1992. – 260.
9. Luhmann N. Risk: A Sociological Theory. N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, Inc., 1993. – 236.
10. Feofanov, K. A. Possibilities of modern social riskology / K. A. Feofanov // Bulletin of MSTU "Stankin". – 2008. – No. 2. – P. 140-144.
11. Risk management through systematization: Risk management culture / S. Filyppova, I. Bashynska, B. Kholod [et al.] // International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. – 2019. – Vol. 8, No. 3. – P. 6047-6052. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5601.098319.
12. Gorodnova, N.V. Analysis of experience in minimizing environmental risks in the process of building a green economy / N.V. Gorodnova, S.A. Sokolov // Economics, entrepreneurship and law. – 2023. – T. 13, No. 6. – S. 1963-1982. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18334/epp.13.6.117812.
13. Possibilities of using risk theory to predict the level of environmental risk in an urbanized area / Yu. A. Tunakova, R. A. Shagidullina, V. S. Valiev, I. G. Grigorieva // The Earth Charter is a practical tool for solving fundamental problems of sustainable development: a collection of materials from the international scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 15th anniversary of the implementation of the principles of the Earth Charter in the Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, October 27–28, 2016. – Kazan: Tatar Book Publishing House, 2016. – P. 209-212.
14. Novikova E.V. Environmental safety: modern legal approaches to risk management // Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 11: Law. – 2018. – No. 6. – P. 44–66.
15. Mamontova, I. Yu. Environmental risks in the system of sustainable development / I. Yu. Mamontova // Moscow Economic Journal. – 2024. – T. 9, No. 2. – P. 762-771. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.55186/2413046X_2024_9_2_112.
16. Kichigin, N.V. Minimization and prevention of environmental and legal risks / N.V. Kichigin // Journal of Russian Law. – 2018. – No. 8(260). – pp. 144-154. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12737/art_2018_8_14. – EDN XUKKLJ.
