from 01.01.1994 until now
Volgograd, Volgograd, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.00 ГОСУДАРСТВО И ПРАВО. ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ
OKSO 40.00.00 Юриспруденция
BBK 6 ОБЩЕСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ
TBK 7 ОБЩЕСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ. ЭКОНОМИКА. ПРАВО.
BISAC LAW LAW
A word in legal practice is never an "empty word". Real people, their well-being, and sometimes their lives are always behind any legal designations. Language, which acts as a fundamental tool of human communication, has historically contributed to the development of society. The protocol language of investigative actions is also an important means of transmitting objective information while maintaining emotional neutrality. The exclusion of subjective assessments is fundamental to ensuring the fairness and impartiality of criminal proceedings. It is noteworthy that there is no such thing as a "protocol language" or "protocol language", but this circumstance does not negate its existence, and the requirements for the registration of protocols, in particular investigative actions, confirm the need for in-depth study of this means of communication.Methods: For a comprehensive consideration of this problem, various classical dialectical and general scientific methods of cognition have traditionally been used: comparative law, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, systemic interpretation. Results: The modern stage, characterized by the development of digital technologies, imposes new requirements on the structure and function of language in investigative practice. In order to meet the modern challenges posed by technological progress, increased attention should be paid to the issues of clarity, accuracy and objectivity of the protocol language. Systematic study and implementation of standards of linguistic culture in the criminal procedure sphere can significantly increase the effectiveness of law enforcement institutions, create and maintain a positive image of law enforcement agencies.Mastering linguistic nuances and their implications in the legal field should become an integral part of the training of legal personnel, including investigators, prosecutors and judges.
protocol, legal discourse, language, word, accuracy, unambiguity, emotional neutrality, written speech, literacy, language culture, investigative actions, indicator, professionalism.
1. Anners E. The History of European Law. M., 1996, p. 75.
2. Vinogradov, I.A. Properties, functions and linguistic features of legal discourse / I.A. Vinogradov // Bulletin of the Kulyashov Moscow State University.– 2018. – № 1(51). – P.124-129. – p. 126.
3. Gubaeva T.V. Language and law: The art of using the word in professional legal activity., M.: Publishing House NORMA,, 2004., 160 p. – p. 64
4. Kosonogova O.V. Characteristics of legal discourse: boundaries, content, parameters / O.V. Kosonogova // Historical and socio-educational thought. Humanities. - 2015. – No. 1. – pp. 61-65.
5. Malyutina O.A. The language of criminology in the protocols of investigative actions// abstract of the dis....Candidate of Law Sciences: 12.00.09 – Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2009. 26 p. – p.17
6. Novikov S.A. Remote interrogation during the preliminary investigation: one step away from implementation // Legal science: history and modernity. 2021. N 11. P. 130.
7. Novikov S.A. Fixation of the testimony of the interrogated during the preliminary investigation: topical issues // Russian investigator. 2023. N 5. pp. 2-6.
8. Solovyova N.A. Amphibolicity of legal discourse or the art of using the word in professional legal activity.//LtgalConsept, 2024, No. 3
9. Khomutova, T.N. Legal discourse: problems and prospects of research / T.N. Khomutova, E.A. Schaefer//. – 2019. – № 3. – Pp. 44-53.
10. Malyutina O.A. The language of criminalistics in the protocols of investigative actions // abstract of the dis. ... cand. Jurid. sciences': 12.00.09. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2009. 26 p.
11. Vinogradov I.A. Properties, functions and linguistic features of legal discourse // Bulletin of the Moscow State University named after A. A. Kulyashov. 2018. No. 1(51). – pp.124-129.
12. Solovyova N.A. Amphibolicity of legal discourse or the art of using the word in professional legal activity // LegalConsept. 2024. No. 3. pp. 14-20.
13. Kosonogova O.V. Characteristics of legal discourse: boundaries, content, parameters // Historical and socio-educational thought. Humanities. 2015. No. 1. pp. 61-65.
14. Khomutova T.N., Schaefer E.A. Legal discourse: problems and prospects of research // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics. 2019. No. 3. pp. 44-53.No. 4(45). pp. 94-102.
15. Akhmedov U.N. Criminal procedural analysis of the form and evidentiary value of investigative protocols // Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2022. No. 3. pp. 186-191.
16. Galyautdinov R.R. Protocol of investigative action as primary and derivative evidence // Modern lawyer. 2023. No. 4(45). pp. 94-102.
17. Gubaeva T.V. Language and law: The art of using the word in professional legal activity. Moscow: Publishing House NORMA, 2004. 160 p.
18. Novikov S.A. Fixation of the testimony of the interrogated during the preliminary investigation: topical issues // Russian investigator. 2023. No. 5. pp. 2-6.
19. Popova O.A. Procedural aspects of fixing evidentiary information presented in electronic form // Eurasian Legal Journal. 2023. No. 8(183). pp. 341-342.
20. Anners E. The History of European law. M., 1996. 395 p.
21. Kosheeva K.I. On the issue of the quality of drawing up protocols of investigative actions // Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law. 2021. No. 1(54). pp. 64-69.
22. Berova D.M., Gauzhaeva V.A. Improving the procedure for protocol recording of the course and results of the search / D. M. Berova, V. A. Gauzhaeva // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2022. No. 5. pp. 377-380.
23. Azarova E.S. Discretion of the court as part of the structure of the criminal procedure paradigm // Legal paradigm. 2019. No. 4. pp. 166-173.
24. Novikov S.A. Remote interrogation during the preliminary investigation: one step away from implementation // Legal science: history and modernity. 2021. No. 11. pp. 128-132.
25. Azarova E.S. Algorithm of court discretion and resolution of petitions in criminal proceedings // Scientific notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Legal sciences. 2018. No. 2. pp. 101-108.
26. Khaidarov A.A. The practice of recognizing protocols of investigative actions as inadmissible evidence // Criminal procedure
