Anthropological basis of formation modern criminal biopolitics

Maksim Bavsun

doi:10.35750/2713-0622-2021-1-39-50

UDC

VAK Russia

5.1.4

ANTHROPOLOGICAL BASIS OF FORMATION MODERN CRIMINAL BIOPOLITICS Anthropological basis of formation modern criminal biopolitics

АА Аа

Published in Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior · Pages 39–50 · Rubric: Anthropology of deviant behavior

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2021-1-39-50

Received: 12.04.2021 Accepted: 14.05.2021 Published: 22.05.2021 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Maksim Bavsun

ORCID

Maksim Bavsun

Academic degree: doctor of jurisprudence sciences

Science rang: professor

Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia Deputy Head of Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia for Research · Russian Federation

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Biopolitics begins to occupy more and more place in the modern understanding of the state about its possibilities in choosing the means necessary to exert the required influence on each individual and society as a whole. The limits of such possibilities, taking into account the knowledge accumulated by mankind in the past few decades, turned out to be truly unlimited, inevitably formulating the question of setting specific goals and objectives implied by the authorities. The function of control has always been inherent in the official power formation, and the problem of determining the limits of its implementation has also always been in the sphere of disagreements, forming various types of societies and states. Biopolitics is a phenomenon of a fundamentally new order, capable of bringing the discussion of this problem to a previously inaccessible level. The criminallegal component of the presented issue is still on the sidelines, continuing to persistently ignore the ongoing processes, and especially the transformation of social relations, the analogs of which in terms of its scale in history are not so many. However, it is criminal policy, through the introduction of biopolitical tools into circulation, that can have the greatest impact on the formation and implementation of the function of controlling individual human behavior and social relations in general. The function, which today is not typical for the criminal law sphere, is ultimately capable of acting as one of the main ones in the course of implementing this area of legal regulation.

KEYWORDS

anthropology, biopolitics, social relations, criminal policy, deviant behavior

1. Borch, C. (2005). Crime Prevention as Totalitarian Biopolitics. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention (6), 91-105.

2. Lalonde, P. C. (2017). Cyborg Work: Borders as Simulation. The British Journal of Criminology, 58 (6), 1361-1380. doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azx070.

3. Nieto, D. (1999). Neoliberalismo, biopolítica y gobernanza del crimen transnaciona // URL: http://. Polucheno 01.04.2021 g., iz www.scielo: www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-56122012000200006.

4. Stenson, K. (2005). Sovereignty, biopolitics and the local government of crime in Britain. Theoretical Criminology, 9 (3), 265-287. doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605054811.

5. Aschaffenburg, G. (2010). Crime and the fight against it. Criminal psychology for doctors, lawyers and sociologists. Moscow: INFRA-M.

6. Babaev, M. M., Pudovochkin, Yu. E. (2021). Essays on Criminal Riskology. Moscow: Yurlitinform.

7. Bavsun, M. V., Popov, D. V. (2018). Metamodern v prave: ostsillyatsiya v tochke Kanetti. Stat’ya I.Proliferatsiya norm i razum. Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii (4), 62-70.

8. Bavsun, M. V., Popov, D. V. (2019). Biopoliticheskiy «bekgraund» ugolovnoy politiki. Filosofiya prava (4), 75-84.

9. Barshev, S. (1840). O mere nakazaniya. Saint Petersburg.

10. Gernet, M. (1974). Izbrannyye proizvedeniya. Moskow: Yurid. lit.

11. Gogel’, S. (1910). Kurs ugolovnoy politiki v svyazi s ugolovnoy sotsiologiyey. Saint Petersburg: Yurid. kn. skl. «Pravo».

12. Goreglyad, O. (1815). Opyt nachertaniya rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh voobshche. Saint Petersburg.

13. Gulyayev, P. (1826). Rossiyskoye ugolovnoye pravo, sostavlennoye iz rossiyskikh gosudarstvennykh uzakoneniy. Moskow.

14. Dril’, D. (1904). Nauka ugolovnoĭ antropologii, yeye predmet i zadachi. Vestnik psikhologii, kriminal’noĭ antropologii i gipnotizma (1), 12-20.

15. Kobylin, I. (2011). Vozvyshennyy ob’’yekt biopolitiki (Dzh. Agamben o probleme svidetel’stva). Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya Sotsial’nyye nauki (3), 118-123.

16. List, F. f. (1900). Prestupleniye kak sotsial’no-patologicheskoye yavleniye. Saint Petersburg: tip. A.V. Orlova.

17. Noy, I. (1975). Metodologicheskiye problemy sovetskoy kriminologii. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta.

18. Ovchinskiy, V. (2005). Kriminologiya i biotekhnologii. Moskow: Norma, 28.

19. Poznyshev, S. (2007). Kriminal’naya psikhologiya. Prestupnyye tipy. O psikhologicheskom issledovanii lichnosti kak sub»yekta povedeniya voobshche i ob izuchenii lichnosti prestupnika v chastnosti. Moskow: INFRA-M.

20. Popov, D. (2020). Ot konstruirovaniya k apgreydu zhizni: rastsvet ili krizis biopolitiki? Chelovek, 31 (6), 72.

21. Prozumentov, L. (2016). O proiskhozhdenii antropologicheskogo napravleniya v ugolovnom prave i kriminologii. Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava, 10(1), 20-27.

22. Prozumentov, L. M., Shesler, A. V. (2014). Otechestvennyye nauchnyye kontseptsii prichin prestupnosti. Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava (1), 49-58.

23. Solntsev, G. (1820). Rossiyskoye ugolovnoye pravo. Kazan’.

24. Solov’yev, V. (2014). Propovednik v pustyne: propovedi o prave (izbrannyye trudy). Moskow: Statut.

25. Sorokin, P. (2006). Prestupleniye i kara. Podvig i nagrada. Moskow: Astrel’.

26. Stoddard, L. (2016). Bunt protiv tsivilizatsii. (V. Avdeyeva, Red., & D. Tkachenko, Perev.) Moskow: Belyye al’vy.

27. Tagantsev, N. (1903). Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Russkoye ugolovnoye pravo (T. 1). Saint Petersburg: tip. M. Stasyulevicha.

28. Tard, G. d. (2009). Prestupnik i prestupleniye. Sravnitel’naya prestupnost’. Prestupleniya tolpy. Moskow: Infra-M.

29. Tarnovskaya, P. (1891). Vorovki. Antropologicheskoye issledovaniye. Zhurnal russkogo obshchestva okhraneniya narodnogo zdraviya (5), 63-64.

30. Tarnovskaya, P. (1902). Zhenshchiny-ubiytsy. Antropologicheskoye issledovaniye. Saint Petersburg: T-vo khudozh. pechati.

31. Torval’d, Yu. (1990). Vek kriminalistiki. (F. Reshetnikov, Red.). Moskow: Progress.

32. Fel’dshteyn, G. S. (2003). Glavnyye techeniya v istorii nauki ugolovnogo prava v Rossii. Moskow: Zertsalo.

33. Fukko, M. (2010). Rozhdeniye biopolitiki. Kurs lektsiy, prochitannyy v Kollezh de Frans v 1978-1979 uchebnom godu. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

34. Chepyzhova, Ye. (2009). Geneticheskiy pas’yans: khromosoma prestupnika. Polucheno 30.03.2021 g., iz abc-gid.ru: www.abc-gid.ru/articles/show/147/.

35. Chizh, V. (1895). Kriminal’naya antropologiya. Odessa: G. Beylenson i I. Yurovskiy.

36. Chubinskiy, M. (1905). Ocherki ugolovnoĭ politiki. Kharkov: printing house «Printing Business».

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

JATS XML

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons

GOST

Bavsun M. V. Anthropological basis of formation modern criminal biopolitics // . 2021. pp. 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2021-1-39-50. (Date of access 19.08.2026).

MLA

Maksim Bavsun. "Anthropological basis of formation modern criminal biopolitics." (2021): 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2021-1-39-50.

APA

Bavsun M. V. (2021). Anthropological basis of formation modern criminal biopolitics. , 39-50. https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2021-1-39-50

Chicago

Maksim Bavsun. "Anthropological basis of formation modern criminal biopolitics." , no. (2021): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2021-1-39-50.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Bavsun M. V. | title = Anthropological basis of formation modern criminal biopolitics | journal = | year = 2021 | pages = 39-50 | doi = 10.35750/2713-0622-2021-1-39-50 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

ANTHROPOLOGICAL BASIS OF FORMATION MODERN CRIMINAL BIOPOLITICS Anthropological basis of formation modern criminal biopolitics

Confirmation