Justification of the principles for developing a system to assess the scale of money laundering of proceeds of crime

Valeriy Shohin

UDC

338

VAK Russia

5.2.3

JUSTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES FOR DEVELOPING A SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE SCALE OF MONEY LAUNDERING OF PROCEEDS OF CRIME Justification of the principles for developing a system to assess the scale of money laundering of proceeds of crime

АА Аа

Published in Economic policy and national security · Pages 112–120 · Rubric: Countering money laundering, corruption, and the Shadow Economy

Received: 14.03.2026 Accepted: 20.04.2026 Published: 30.04.2026

Authors

Valeriy Shohin

ORCID

Valeriy Shohin

Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia Post-graduate · Department of Economic Security · Russian Federation · Saint Petersburg

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Ensuring national security in the economic sphere requires a reliable assessment of the actual scale of the legalisation (laundering) of criminal proceeds. In this regard, the development of scientifically sound principles for constructing a system to analyse the scale of money laundering and identifying its characteristics relevant to the mechanism for combating the legalisation (laundering) of proceeds derived from criminal activity and the financing of terrorism (hereinafter – AML/CFT), is of critical importance. Methods. The main method of the study is the method of dialectical scientific cognition, based on a combination of recognised discipline-specific and general scientific methods. The methodological basis of the study consists of methods of systemic economic and legal analysis, comparative analysis of approaches of the Financial Action Task Force (hereinafter – FATF) and the Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism (EAG), as well as the method of multi-level decomposition of shadow processes (macro-, meso-, micro-levels). Results. Five basic principles for constructing a system to analyse the scale of money laundering have been identified: multi-level decomposition, complementarity of methods, functional adequacy for risk management, adaptability to changes in money laundering schemes, and controlled transparency of results. Key properties of the system in the context of AML/CFT have been identified: trainable verifiability (calibration using data from real investigations), resilience to data aggregation, sensitivity to threshold values of Federal Law No. 115-FZ of 7 August 2001, vector dynamics (assessment of trends in the “money laundering volume/detectability” pair), as well as the ability to assess the effectiveness of countermeasures. An architectural diagram of the system has been developed, comprising modules for assessing the incoming criminal flow, transactional network analysis, macroeconomic verification and scenario modelling of regulatory decisions. Critical limitations are noted: fundamental incompleteness of coverage of income not included in the financial system; a shift in latency as controls are tightened; non-stationarity of the behaviour of the assessment objects under the influence of the countermeasures themselves. The practical value of the system for Rosfinmonitoring is substantiated: strategic positioning vis-à-vis the country’s leadership and the FATF, tactical optimisation of resource allocation, and a transition to the performance metric “proportion of the estimated criminal proceeds flow blocked”. The importance of publicly communicating aggregated results for building trust between society and the regulator in the AML/CFT sphere is highlighted.

KEYWORDS

scale of money laundering, principles of system design, properties of the AML/CFT system, complementarity of methods, architectural diagram, economic security

1. Avdiyskiy, Vladimir I., and Lyudmila Kh. Botasheva, Andrey N. Shcherbakov. 2020. “Analiz zarubezhnogo opyta vystraivaniya mekhanizmov POD/FT na osnove risk-orientirovannogo podkhodaˮ [“Analysis of foreign experience in building AML/CFT mechanisms based on a risk-based approachˮ] (In Russ.). Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Economics: yesterday, today, tomorrow] 10, no. 10-1 (October):56–65. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.17.56.007

2. Gorodnova, Natalya V., and Sergii A. Sokolov. 2025. “Analiz mer protivodeystviya korrupcii: mirovoy opyt i otechestvennaya praktikaˮ [“Analysis of Anti-Corruption Measures: Global Experience and Domestic Practiceˮ] (In Russ.). Ekonomika, predprinimatelstvo i pravo [Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law] 15, no. 8 (August):5115–36. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.15.8.123471

3. Nabiev, Ramazan A., and Natalia Yu. Tanyushcheva, Elza T. Isakova. 2023. “Finansovaya sushchnost otmyvaniya denegˮ [“Financial essence of money launderingˮ] (In Russ.). In: EzanginaI. A., Chekhovskaya I. A. (eds.) Menedzhment i finansy proizvodstvennykh sistem [Management and Finance of Production Systems] 145–48. Kursk : Universitetskaya kniga.

4. Sidorenko, Nikolai I. 2016. “Printsipy i ikh znachenie dlya postroeniya teoriiˮ [“Principles and their significance for theory constructionˮ] (In Russ.). Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G. V. Plekhanova [Bulletin of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics] 86, no. 2 (April):157–66.

5. Tanyushcheva, Natalia Yu., and Natalia N. Kunitsyna. 2021. “Metodicheskie podkhody k otsenke kolichestvennykh parametrov obema otmyvaniya denegˮ [“Methodological approaches to assessing quantitative parameters of money laundering volumeˮ] (In Russ.). Natsionalnye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost [National interests: priorities and security] 403, vol. 10, no. 10 (October):1903–28. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.10.1903

6. Tanyushcheva, Natalia Yu., and Elza T. Isakova. 2024. “Otsenka masshtabov otmyvaniya deneg v Rossiiˮ [“Estimating the scale of money laundering in Russiaˮ] (In Russ.). Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic issues], no. 10 (October): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-77-93

7. Shokhin, Valery K. 2025. “Podkhody k sisteme subektov natsionalnoy sistemy protivodeystviya otmyvaniyu dokhodovˮ [“Approaches to the system of subjects of the national anti-money laundering systemˮ]. In: Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' lichnosti, obshchestva, gosudarstva: problemy i puti obespecheniya [Economic Security of the Individual, Society, State: Problems and Solutions] (In Russ.) 472–6. Sankt-Peterburg : Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii.

8. Diaz, Julian [et al.]. 2025. “Dynamic Trust Modulation and Human Oversight in AI-Driven AML Systems: A Conceptual Framework for Compliance.ˮ International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 16, no. 12 (December):92–111. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0161209

9. Korpela, Sonja J. 2025. “Between a rock and a hard place: managing the conflict between anti-money laundering and financial inclusion.ˮ Journal of Money Laundering Control 28, no. 7 (December):65–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2024-0182

10. Popik-Mazur, Anna. 2025. “A systematic literature review of illicit financial flows and money laundering: Current state of research and estimation methods.ˮ Journal of Economics and Management 47 1 (January):257–98. https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2025.47.11

11. Quirk, Peter J. 1996. “Macroeconomic Implications of Money Laundering.ˮ In: IMF Working Paper 33 [Washington, D. C.] : International Monetary Fund 30–33. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451962123.001

12. Walker, John, and Brigitte Unger. 2013. “Measuring global money laundering: the ‘Walker Gravity Model’.ˮ In: Unger B., van der Linde D. (eds.). Research Handbook on Money Laundering 159–171. Cheltenham Glos, UK : Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934000.00023

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

JATS XML

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons

GOST

Shohin V. K. Justification of the principles for developing a system to assess the scale of money laundering of proceeds of crime // . 2026. pp. 112-120. (Date of access 19.08.2026).

MLA

Valeriy Shohin. "Justification of the principles for developing a system to assess the scale of money laundering of proceeds of crime." (2026): 112-120.

APA

Shohin V. K. (2026). Justification of the principles for developing a system to assess the scale of money laundering of proceeds of crime. , 112-120.

Chicago

Valeriy Shohin. "Justification of the principles for developing a system to assess the scale of money laundering of proceeds of crime." , no. (2026): 112-120.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Shohin V. K. | title = Justification of the principles for developing a system to assess the scale of money laundering of proceeds of crime | journal = | year = 2026 | pages = 112-120 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

JUSTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES FOR DEVELOPING A SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE SCALE OF MONEY LAUNDERING OF PROCEEDS OF CRIME Justification of the principles for developing a system to assess the scale of money laundering of proceeds of crime

Confirmation