VAK Russia 5.1.4 UDC 342.55

THE ROLE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN COGNITIVE AND EVIDENTIARY ACTIVITIES OF INVESTIGATORS AND INQUIRY OFFICERS The role of criminal proceedings in cognitive and evidentiary activities of investigators and inquiry officers

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Volume 2026, Issue 3 · Pages 160–168 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES
Received: 11.02.2026 Accepted: 24.09.2026 Published: 29.09.2026 Language of publication: RUS
Introduction. The article examines the issues of correlation between the goals of criminal procedural activity and its purpose in the course of the fact-finding and certifying activity of the investigator and the interrogating officer. The article analyses the problems of cognisance and its correlation with proving, along with the relevance of considering this comparison. The goals and means of cognisance are identified, as well as current challenges in their application by officials in fulfilling the purpose of criminal proceedings. The study summarises scholarly views on the purpose of criminal proceedings, the essence and goals of cognisance in pre-trial proceedings, and how Article 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code shapes the fact-finding activities of investigators and inquiry officers. Issues concerning the purpose of criminal proceedings for victims and offenders are also addressed. Methods and results. To achieve the objective, the study employed the descriptive, formal-logical, and legal interpretation methods. The findings establish that, for investigators and inquiry officers, the purpose of criminal proceedings is shaped by the public interests of the state, and their fact-finding and certifying activity is oriented toward the attainment of this purpose through the legally prescribed means.
criminal proceedings, purpose of criminal proceedings, investigator, inquiry officer, cognisance, certification, proving
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Grigor'ev V. N., Zaycev O. A., Maksimov O. A. Hodataystva i zhaloby kak «gradoobrazuyuschiy» element suschnosti ugolovnogo processa // Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2023. № 1 (71). S. 10–16. https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2023.1.2

2. Mel'nikov V. Yu. Naznachenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, obyazannost' i otvetstvennost' vlastnyh sub'ektov // Severo-Kavkazskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2013. № 3. S. 65–69.

3. Lantuh N. V. Rol' ugolovnogo presledovaniya v sisteme ugolovno-processual'nyh institutov // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya yurisprudenciya. 2021. № 2. S. 47–52. https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-2-47-52

4. Krugova N. V. Suschnost' poznavatel'noy deyatel'nosti sledovatelya kak sub'ekta truda v hode proizvodstva sledstvennyh deystviy po ugolovnomu delu // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Social'naya rabota. Yuvenologiya. Sociokinetika. 2010. T. 16, № 1. S. 162–164.

5. Trusov A. I. Osnovy teorii sudebnyh dokazatel'stv: Kratkiy ocherk. Moskva : Izdatel'stvo yuridicheskoy literatury, 1960. 176 s.

6. Belkin A. R. Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: monografiya. Moskva: Norma, 2005. 527 s.

7. Antonova E. Yu. Dokazyvanie kak vid poznaniya i ego teoreticheskoe i prakticheskoe znachenie. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2015. № 1. s. 209–213.

8. Pisarevskiy I. I. Sootnosheniya poznaniya i dokazyvaniya pri opredelenii nakazaniya i problemy kachestva prigovorov. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2016. № 3 (64). S. 143–151. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2016.64.3.143-151

9. Kornakova S. V. Poznanie i dokazyvanie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: problemy sootnosheniya ponyatiy. Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2023. T. 17, № 3. S. 243–253. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2023.17(3).243-253

10. Grudinin I. A. Poznanie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2010. № 2 (15). S. 272–281.

11. Popov K. I. Naznachenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva//Vestnik Ural'skogo instituta upravleniya ekonomiki i prava. 2016. № 4 (37). S. 31–33.

12. Trubnikova T. V. Teoreticheskie osnovy uproschennyh sudebnyh proizvodstv: monografiya. Tomsk: Izdatel'stvo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1999. 132 s.

13. Androsenko N. V. Priznanie viny v sovershenii prestupleniya kak uslovie prinyatiya processual'nyh resheniĭ po UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2007. № 23. S. 6–8.

14. Rossinskiy S. B. Sredstva dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. 2023. T. 9, № 1. S. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2023-9-1-37-45

15. Matveykovich M. S. Realizaciya konstitucionnyh norm i zaschita prav cheloveka v otechestvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2018. № 5 (257). S. 26–35. https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2018_5_3

16. Smirnova I. G. K voprosu o publichnom i dispozitivnom nachalah rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (cherez prizmu nauchnyh vzglyadov professora L. N. Maslennikovoy) // Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2025. № 1. S. 127–133. https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.14