Russian Federation
employee from 01.01.2019 to 01.01.1924
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 159.9.072.5 Методы
Introduction. The article is devoted to the studies of psycho-diagnostic criteria for the professional reliability of officers of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation as subjects of law enforcement activities performing important state tasks to protect public order and ensure public safety. Its purpose was to try to identify scale psycho-diagnostic indicators of test methods used for the professional psychological selection of candidates for training and psychological support for the professional development of future officers of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation, which, could serve as criteria for evaluating and predicting their personal professional reliability. Research methods. The study used methods of psychological diagnosis (10 test psycho-diagnostic techniques, including for the study of the peculiarities of thinking – the Intelligence Structure Test (IST) – MIOM, self-assessment of the current mental state – SUPOS-8, studying the Schwartz’s basic values of personality, unconscious Self-structural elements of personality with the help of a Psycho-dynamic Oriented Personality Questionnaire (POPQ) “Resource” and etc.), previously selected by specialists of the professional psychological selection group and approved in accordance with the established procedure by the management, expert assessments of the results of the training and service activities of cadets and the professional activities of graduates at primary officer training positions, retrospective analysis of psychodiagnostic indicators of the methods used, statistical methods of comparative analysis (The Mann–Whitney U-test and Variance analysis). Based on the analysis of independent expert assessment and performance results, the gradation of cadets and graduate officers of the military institute into four groups with different levels (high, medium, below medium, low) of professional reliability was carried out. Results. As a result of a retrospective comparative analysis of data of psychodiagnostic tests of 221 male cadets, 52 scale indicators were identified from more than 200 psychodiagnostic indicators (scales) of the methods used, statistically significantly distinguishing subjects with different levels of professional reliability, 21 (58%) of which had a linear dependence on the level (group) of professional reliability and a 7-year depth the forecast. Depending on the nature of the differences obtained, some can be used as psychological (personal) predictors and protectors of professional reliability, while others can be used as limiting factors of its manifestation and development.The scientific novelty and practical significance of the obtained psycho-diagnostic indicators is determined by the possibility of their use for psychological forecasting of professional reliability not only of cadets during their studies at a military university, but also of graduate officers during their professional activities in the military on primary officer positions, including through the creation of special decision forecasting rules (regression equations and discriminant functions). In addition, the obtained psycho-diagnostic indicators (scales) can be correctly extrapolated as criteria (predictors, protectors and limiting factors) of professional reliability to the officer (commanding) staff of other state law enforcement agencies, including the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, and also used to create algorithms (decision rules) of psychological forecasting of their professional reliability at the stages of professional psychological selection, professional development and psychological support of professional activity.
professional reliability, psycho-diagnostic criteria, expert assessment, retrospective comparative analysis, Schwartz Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ), Psycho-dynamic Oriented Personality Questionnaire (POPQ) “Resource”, psychological forecasting, predictive validity
1. Fedotov A. Yu. Motivatsionnyye faktory professional’noy nadezhnosti spetsialista silovykh struktur // Chelovecheskiy kapital. – 2019. – № 10 (130). – S. 141–150.
2. Fedenko N. F. Ocherki po psikhologii lichnosti sovetskogo voina. – Moskva: [b. i.], 1966. – 228 s.
3. Talashmanova K. A. Diagnostika professional’noy nadezhnosti sub”yekta // Innovatsionnaya nauka. – 2020. – № 5. – S. 177–183.
4. Talashmanova K. A. K probleme ponimaniya professional’noy nadezhnosti // Chelovecheskiy kapital. – 2020. – № 3 (135). – S. 239–245; https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2020.03.28.
5. Chekunov A. A., Alekseyev A. A. Professional’naya nadozhnost’ kursantov voyennykh vuzov: k postanovke problemy // Mir nauki : setevoye izdaniye. – 2018. – T. 6. – № 5. – URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/06PSMN518.pdf.
6. Tsvetkova I. I., Sivolap A. V. Formirovaniye modeli nadezhnosti personala turistkoy organizatsii // Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tekhnike, prirode i obshchestve. – 2017. – № 2 (22). – S. 129–139.
7. Smirnov S. V., Ovchar N. A. , Lifanova Ye. V., Todorev A. N. , Dyatlov M. N. Sovremennyye metodiki psikhologicheskoy diagnostiki spetsialistov otvetstvennykh i opasnykh professiy // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i yestestvennykh nauk. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 50–54.
8. Strizhov Ye. Yu. Moral’nyye i universal’nyye tsennosti v sisteme nravstvennoy nadozhnosti lichnosti // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. – 2009. – № 1 (79). – S. 84–88.
9. Mozgunova S. I., Redina Ye. A. Emotsional’noye vygoraniye kak faktor, snizhayushchiy professional’nuyu nadezhnost’ pozharnykh // Sovremennyye tekhnologii obespecheniya grazhdanskoy oborony i likvidatsii posledstviy chrezvychaynykh situatsiy. – 2018. – № 1 (9). – S. 309–311.
10. Berebin M. A., Grigor’yeva I. Yu. Kliniko-psikhodiagnosticheskiye osnovaniya otsenki i prognoza riska narusheniy psikhicheskoy adaptatsii i professional’noy nadezhnosti sotrudnikov pravookhranitel’nykh organov // Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya. – 2011. – № 29. – S. 58–68.
11. Dryagalova Ye. A., Stepanova A. A. Diagnostika akmeologicheskogo potentsiala lichnosti i professional’noy nadezhnosti kursantov MVD RF // Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya : setevoye izdaniye. – 2017. – № 6. – S. 166–174. – URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/issue/view?id=150.
12. Shapoval V. A. Professional’noye psikhologicheskoye zdorov’ye sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del: diagnostika, prognozirovaniye, monitoring : monografiya. – Sankt-Peterburg: SPbU MVD Rossii, 2015. – 296 s.
13. Osadchuk O. L. Vzaimosvyaz’ professional’noy nadezhnosti i professionalizma pedagoga // Professional’noye obrazovaniye v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2013. – № 1 (9). – S. 25–31.
14. Putivtsev P. V. O psikhologicheskoy otsenke professional’noy nadezhnosti personala gossluzhby na etape professional’nogo rosta // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologicheskiye nauki. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 95–102.
15. Abrams H. Human Reliability and Safety in the Handling of Nuclear Weapons // Science & Global Security. – 1991. – Vol. 2. – No 4. – P. 325–349.
16. Lata V. F., Coates C. Implementation and sustainability of the Russian Federation Ministry of Defense nuclear Personnel Reliability Program / INMM 51st Annual Meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, Jul 11–16, 2010. – URL: https://www.ornl.gov/publication/implementation-and-sustainability-russian-federation-ministry-defense-nuclear-personnel.
17. Kopylova N. V., Petrov N. N. Psikhologicheskaya nadezhnost’ v spetsifike raboty okhranno-konvoynoy sluzhby MVD RF // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya. – 2017. – Vyp. 4. – S. 12–16.
18. Kopylova N. V., Petrov N. N. Osobennosti psikhologicheskoy otsenki pokazateley professional’noy nadezhnosti sotrudnikov okhranno-konvoynoy sluzhby MVD RF v protsesse yeye formirovaniya / Psikhologiya, obrazovaniye: aktual’nyye i prioritetnyye napravleniya issledovaniy : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii studentov, magistrov, aspirantov, molodykh uchenykh i ikh nastavnikov, 15 maya 2018 g. – Tver’: Tverskoy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2018. – S. 66–70.
19. Grinval’d O. V. Problema diagnostiki sotsial’no-eticheskoy kompetentnosti studentovbudushchikh yuristov // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2009. – № 3. – S. 42–45.
20. Baturin N. A., Vuchetich Ye. V., Kostromina S. N., Kukarkin B. A. [i dr.] Rossiyskiy standart testirovaniya personala (vremennaya versiya, sozdannaya dlya shirokogo obsuzhdeniya v 2015 godu). // Organizacionnaya psihologiya : elektronnyj zhurnal. – 2015. – T. 5. – № 2. – S. 67–138.
