Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory

Mikhail Babayev; Yuriy Pudovochkin

doi:10.35750/2071-8284-2022-4-78-89

VAK Russia 5.1.4 UDC 343.214 CSCSTI 10.00 Russian Classification of Professions by Education 40.00.00 Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification 6 Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification 7 BISAC LAW

7 more Collapse

JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CRIMINAL LAW: QUESTIONS OF THEORY Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory

АА Аа

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Volume 2022, Issue 4 · Pages 78–89 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-4-78-89

Received: 11.10.2022 Accepted: 16.12.2022 Published: 16.12.2022 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Mikhail Babayev

ORCID

Yuriy Pudovochkin

ORCID Scopus SPIN

Mikhail Babayev

Academic degree: doctor of jurisprudence sciences

Science rang: professor

All-Russian Research Institute of the MIA of Russia glavnyy nauchnyy sotrudnik · Russian Federation · Москва

ORCID

Yuriy Pudovochkin

Academic degree: doctor of jurisprudence sciences

Science rang: professor

Moscow State Law University named after O. E. Kutafin Russian Federation

ORCID Scopus SPIN

ABSTRACT

The interpretation of the law in judicial activity, as well as the search for specific features of the interpretation of the criminal law, belong to the category of topics whose relevance in modern conditions is increasing much. The contradiction between the growing criminalization and the increasing concern about the observance of human rights and freedoms actualize the status of interpretation as one of the most important aspects of legal activity, directly ensuring the rule of law in criminal law relations. In any law-making text, there are always a lot of subjective meanings, only one of which can objectively be the basis of a judicial decision. Based on the generalization of the existing approaches to understanding the interpretation of the law, two of its basic models are distinguished - the model of the presentation of the parliamentary meaning and the model of the presentation of the judicial meaning of the law. It is proved that law enforcement is determined precisely by the judicial meaning of the law, the establishment of which in the process of interpretation is a significant component of judicial legal policy. Understanding the meaning of the criminal law has a specificity being predetermined by the public nature of the branch of criminal law, this impresses the course of action of the court within the framework of the implementation of the principle of separation of powers. However, this specificity cannot consist of, as it is commonly considered to be in science, in limiting the methods of interpretation used by the court or establishing a rigid hierarchical sequence in the application of methods of interpretation. The specificity of the interpretation of the criminal law should be determined not by the methods of interpretation, but by the principles of criminal law. Their content, in turn, should be revealed through an appeal to the goals of criminal law regulation. According to the results of the study, the general approach to the interpretation of the criminal law, which being literal as a matter of priority, should combine a restrictive understanding of any legal restrictions and a broad understanding of any defenses against a charge of a crime.

KEYWORDS

criminal law, interpretation of criminal law, methods of interpretation of the law, principles of criminal law, goals of criminal law

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Kel'zen G. Nauka i politika // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. - 2020. - T. 15.- № 1. - S. 183 - 209 (perevod s angliyskogo A. B. Didikina i E. A. Vakatovoy po izdaniyu 1951 g.: Kelsen H. Science and Politics // The American Political Science Review. 1951. Vol. XLV. № 3. Pp. 641 - 661). DOI:https://doi.org/10.35427/2073-4522-2020-15-1-kelsen.

2. Ekins R. The Nature of Legislative Intent. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. - 303 p. ISBN: 978-0-19-964699-9.

3. Skoczeń I. Implicatures within Legal Language. Law and Philosophy Library. - Vol 127. Krakow: Springer, 2019. - 172 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12532-5_5.

4. Yani P. S. Voprosy tolkovaniya ugolovnogo zakona // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 11. Pravo. - 2012. - № 4. - S. 55-75.

5. Kurylev S. V. O primenenii sovetskogo zakona // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1966. - № 11. - S. 21-29.

6. Ershov V. V. «Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo»: pro et contra // Pravosudie. - 2020. - T. 2. - № 1. - S. 7-35. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37399/issn2686-9241.2020.1.7-35.

7. Mihai Gh. C. Fundamentele Dreptului. Argumentare şi Interpretare în Drept. - Bucureşti: Ed. Lumina Lex, 2000. - 383 p.

8. Craiovan I. Tratat de Teoria Generală a Dreptului, Editia a IV-a. - Bucureşti: Ed. Universul Juridic, 2020. - 633 p. ISBN: 978-606-39-0732-6.

9. Guastini R. Il Diritto Come Linguaggio. Lezioni. - Torino: Editore, 2006. - 232 p. ISBN: 978-88-3486-402-9.

10. Herget J. E., Wade I., Bülow O. Gesetz Und Richteramt: Statutory Law and the Judicial Function // The American Journal of Legal History. - 1995. -Vol. 39. - Iss.1. - pp. 71 - 94. https://doi.org/10.2307/845751.

11. Chayes A. The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. Harvard Law Review, 1976. - Vol. 89. - Pp. 1281-1316. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340256.

12. Herget J. E., Wallace S. The German Free Law Movement as the Source of American Legal Realism. Virginia Law Review, 1987. - Vol. 73. - Pp. 399-455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073069.

13. Ignatescu C. The Concept of Judicial Interpretation. Postmodern Openings, 2013. - Vol. 4. - Pp. 17-23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18662/po/2013.0404.03.

14. Giezek J. Struktura Przepisu (Normy) Prawa Karnego, 2007. - Pp. 50 - 58. In: Bojarski M. (Ed.). Prawo Karne Materialne. Część Ogólna i Szczegółowa. Warszawa: LexisNexis. - 869 p. ISBN: 978-83-8223-673-6.

15. Ornowska A. Introducing Hermeneutic Methods in Criminal Law Interpretation in Europe. - 2010. - Pp. 251-278. In: Jemielniak, J. and Mikłaszewicz P. (Eds). Interpretation of Law in the Global World: From Particularism to a Universal Approach. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg. - 377 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04886-9_13.

16. Schepel'kov V. F. Ugolovnyy zakon: preodolenie protivorechiy i nepolnoty : monografiya - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2003. - 416 s. ISBN 5-93295-078-1.

17. Herman Sh. Quot Judices Tot Sententiae: A Study of the English Reaction to Continental Interpretive Techniques. Legal Studies, 1981. - Vol. 1, № 2. - Pp. 165-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1981.tb00119.x.

18. Liang Genlin Interpretation of the Application of Criminal Law from the Perspective of a Legally Prescribed Punishment for a Specified Crime. Frontiers of Law in China. - 2007. - Vol. 2, № 3. - Pp. 418-445. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-007-0020-2.

19. Nita B., Swiatłowski A. Linguistic Pluralism and Interpretation of European Law in the Third Pillar, Discussed with Reference to the Example of Article 54 of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement. - 2010. - Pp. 231 - 250. In: Jemielniak, J. and Mikłaszewicz P. (eds). Interpretation of Law in the Global World: From Particularism to a Universal Approach. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg. 377 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04886-9_12.

20. Braynin Ya. M. Ugolovnyy zakon i ego primenenie. - Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1967. - 240 s.

21. Kremnitzer M. Interpretation in Criminal Law. Israel Law Review. -2016. - Vol. 21, № 3-4. - P. 358-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700009195.

22. Ristivoјeviћ B. O Poretku Nachela u Ciљnom (Teleoloshkom) Tumacheњu u Krivichnom Pravu / Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Novom Sadu. - 2012. - № 4. - S. 241 - 256. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-3237.

23. Dworkin R. Law as Interpretation. Critical Inquiry. - 1982. Vol. 9, № 1. - Pp. 179 - 200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/448194.

GOST

Babayev M. M., Pudovochkin Y. E. Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory // Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2022. no. 4. pp. 78-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-4-78-89. (Date of access 10.10.2026).

MLA

Mikhail Babayev, Pudovochkin Y. E.. "Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2022.4 (2022): 78-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-4-78-89.

APA

Babayev M. M., Pudovochkin Y. E. (2022). Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2022(4), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-4-78-89

Chicago

Mikhail Babayev, Pudovochkin Y. E.. "Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2022, no. 4 (2022): 78-89. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-4-78-89.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Babayev M. M., Pudovochkin Y. E. | title = Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory | journal = Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia | year = 2022 | volume = 2022 | issue = 4 | pages = 78-89 | doi = 10.35750/2071-8284-2022-4-78-89 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CRIMINAL LAW: QUESTIONS OF THEORY Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory

Confirmation